Mobilizing Frontiers

“Heretical Masters” and Their Ideological and Religio-political Change in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries

Authors

  • NGUYEN Thanh Phong University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • NGUYEN Ngoc Tho University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • NGUYEN Trung Hieu An Giang University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2024.12.3.65-100

Keywords:

“heretical masters”, Mekong Delta, standardization, patriotism, anti-French movements

Abstract

Since the late 17th century, the Mekong Delta has become a vibrant place for Vietnamese, ethnic Khmer, and ethnic Chinese settlements, forming mixed communities in terms of race and culture. As a new frontier, the Delta has continuously undergone state-sponsored “civilizing” processes. The resulting hybridity in folk culture gave birth to various religious sects, especially on the Vietnamese-Cambodian border. From the view of late imperial Confucianism, these groups were judged as “heretical sects” and their leaders “heretical masters”. Despite being classified as “heretical”, these local “masters” and their communities still insisted on the core Confucian values of benevolence, righteousness and patriotism. Chinese secret societies and rebels escaped to the Delta in different times, bringing new ideas to the region, especially the cults of Five Lord Buddhas, Maitreya, and the concept of the birth of the wise king. Under French suppression, these “heretical masters” changed their religious strategies, supported local military leaders and secret societies to “fight the French and restore Đại Nam”. This research aims to investigate and analyse the “heretical” religious movements and ideological transformation of “heretical masters” in the Mekong River Delta in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, thereby strengthening the argument that although Vietnam’s local religious elites were marginalized and suppressed by state governance (the Nguyễn dynasty, French colonialists), they always cared about national independence and social prosperity, and therefore transformed their sectarian strategies into a special form of religio-political hybridity. National independence was definitely prioritized, and therefore the concept of “loyalty” in the traditional Confucian view turned into “patriotism” in the new context of French invasion and colonialization. This study uses a mixture of extensive field data collected between 2015‒2017 and 2022‒2024 (the primary data source for this study) with limited original texts from the Nguyễn dynasty and the research findings of selective previous scholars, and applies the theoretical concept of “standardization” and/or “orthopraxy” from the pre-modern Confucian tradition to examine and analyse political-religious practices, ideological transformation, and implicit narratives among local religious masters in rural Southern Vietnam, confirming that the Mekong Delta has fostered an environment of cultural and religious dynamism and pluralism since the late 19th century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ang, Claudine. 2019. Poetic Transformations: Eighteenth-century Cultural Projects on the Mekong Plains. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Asia Center.

Brocheux, Pierre. 1995. The Mekong Delta: Ecology, Economy and Evolution, 1860‒1960. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Công Luận Newspaper. 1938. “Gian đạo sĩ.” Công Luận Newspaper, December 27, 1938. http://baochi.nlv.gov.vn/baochi/cgi-bin/baochi?a=d&d=WHfY19381227.2.16. Accessed on May 8, 2024.

Coulet, Georges. [1926] 2019. Hội kín xứ An Nam (Les sociétés secrètes en terre d’Annam). Translted by Nguyễn Thanh Xuân, and Phan Tín Dụng. Hanoi: Literature Association.

Dật, Sĩ, and Nguyễn Văn Hầu. 1955. Thất Sơn mầu nhiệm (The Mysterious Seven Mountains). Saigon: Từ Tâm.

DeGroot, J. J. M. [1903] 1904. Sectarianism and Religious Persecution in China. Amsterdam: Johannes Muller.

Do, Thien. 2003: Vietnamese Supernaturalism: Views from the Southern Region. London, New York: Routledge.

Đinh, Văn Hạnh. 1999. Đạo Tứ Ân Hiếu Nghĩa của người Việt Nam Bộ (1867-1975) (Tứ Ân Hiếu Nghĩa Sect of the Vietnamese People, 1867‒1975). Ho Chi Minh City: Youth Publishers.

Elman, Benjamin A., John B. Duncan, and Herman Ooms, eds. 2002. Rethinking Confucianism: Past And Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series.

Faure, David. 2004. “The Heaven and Earth Society in the Nineteenth Century: An Interpretation.” In Heterodoxy in Late Imperial China, edited by Kwang-Ching Liu, and Richard Shek, 365‒91. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Goschar, E. Christopher. 2012. Going Indochinese: Contesting Concepts of Space and Place in French Indochina. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

Hà, Tân Dân. 1971. Hệ phái Tứ Ân Hiếu Nghĩa (Tứ Ân Hiếu Nghĩa Sect). Saigon: Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương Bookcase.

Ho Tai, Hue-Tam. 1983, Millenarianism and Peasant Politics in Vietnam. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Hoàng, Phê. 2016. Từ điển tiếng Việt (The Vietnamese Dictionary). Hanoi: Hồng Đức.

Hứa, Hoành. 1993. “Thiên Địa Hội và cuộc khởi nghĩa của Phan Xích Long Hoàng đế (Tiandihui and the Phan Xích Long Uprising).” In Nam Kỳ Lục tỉnh – ký sự miền Nam (Six Southern Provinces – Notes of Southern Vietnam). Hanoi: Văn hóa.

Huỳnh, Ngọc Đáng. 2018. Chính sách của các vương triều Việt Nam đối với người Hoa (The Policies of Vietnamese Dynasties towards the Ethnic Chinese). Ho Chi Minh City: Tổng hợp.

Huỳnh, Ngọc Trảng, ed. 2012. Đặc khảo văn hóa người Hoa ở Nam bộ (Special Study on Chinese Culture in Southern Vietnam). Hanoi: Văn hóa dân tộc.

Katz, Paul R. 2007: “Orthopraxy and Heteropraxy Beyond the State: Standardizing Ritual in Chinese Society.” Modern China 33 (1): 72‒90.

Ko, Yu-shien 柯毓賢. 1983. “Zhuan tian tu jing kao 〈《轉天圖經》考〉 (A Textual Research on the Chuan Tien Tu Ching.” Food Monthly 13 (5/6): 197‒203.

Ko, Yu-shien 柯毓賢. 1987. “Zhuan tian tu jing’xu kao: Qiu Fu, Dong Chang yu xi dao 柯毓賢:〈「轉天圖經」續考:裘甫、董昌與巫覡道〉 (Continued Examination of the Chuan Tien Tu Ching: Qiu Fu, Dong Chang and Witchcraft.” Food Monthly 16 (9/10): 364‒71.

Ko, Yu-shien 柯毓賢. 1990. “Nansong chu nian wangfa’en zhi luan ji qi yu “zhuan tian tu jing” zhi guanxi 〈南宋初年王法恩之亂及其與《轉天圖經》之關係 (The Rebellion of Wang Fa’en in the Early Southern Song Dynasty and Its Relations with the Chuan Tien Tu Ching.” Studies in Oriental Religions 1: 181‒95.

Liam, C. Kelley. 2006. “‘Confucianism’ in Vietnam: A State of the Field Essay.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 1 (1-2): 314‒70.

Liu, Kwang-Ching, and Richard Shek, eds. 2004. Heterodoxy in late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Lưu, Kim Hoa, ed. 2016. Văn hóa người Hoa ở Nam Bộ (The Ethnic Chinese Culture in Southern Vietnam). Ho Chi Minh City: Văn hóa – Văn nghệ.

Marr, David. 1984. Vietnamese Traditions on Trial, 1920‒1945. Berkley: University of California Press.

McDonough, Sheila. 2005. “Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, edited by Lindsay John, 6909‒13. Detroit, Michigan: Macmillan Reference USA.

McHale, Shawn 2002. “Mapping a Vietnamese Confucian Past and Its Transition to Modernity.” In Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, edited by Benjamin A. Elman, John B. Duncan, and Herman Ooms, 397‒430. Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series.

Nghê, Văn Lương. 1972. Cà Mau xưa và Long Xuyên nay (The Old-day Cà Mau and Present-day An Xuyên). Saigon: Center for Course-books, Ministry of Education.

Nguyễn, Cẩm Thúy, ed. 2000. Định cư của người Hoa trên vùng đất Nam Bộ từ thế kỷ XVII đến năm 1945 (The Ethnic Chinese Settlements in Southern Vietnam from the 17th century to 1945). Hanoi: Khoa học xã hội.

Nguyễn, Đình Chiểu. 2007. Văn tế Nghĩa sĩ Cần Giuộc (The Funeral Oration on the Cần Giuộc Righteous Martyrs). 11th Grade Textbook on Literature. Hanoi: Giáo dục, Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training.

Nguyễn, Hữu Hiếu, and Nguyễn Thanh Thuận, com. and eds. 2019. Cuộc kháng chiến chống Pháp ở Nam kỳ và Đồng Tháp qua châu bản triều Nguyễn (Records of the Nguyễn Dynasty on the Anti-French War in Cochin China and Đồng Tháp). Hanoi: Hanoi Publishers.

Nguyễn, Ngọc Thơ. 2017. Tín ngưỡng Thiên Hậu vùng Tây Nam Bộ (The Cult of Tian Hou in the Mekong River Delta). Hanoi: Chính trị Quốc gia.

Nguyễn, Thanh Phong. 2018. “Sự dung nạp tín ngưỡng Ngũ Công Vương Phật trong đạo Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương (The Adoption of the Cult of the Five Lord Buddhas in Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương Sect).” Religion Studies 10 (178): 110‒30.

Nguyễn, Thanh Phong. 2019. “Hiện tượng “gian đạo sĩ” ở Nam Bộ thế kỷ 19 (The Phenomenon of “Heterodox Masters” in Southern Vietnam of the 19th Century).” Religion Studies 3 (183): 54‒74.

Nguyễn, Thanh Tiến. 2005. “Hội kín ở Nam Kỳ cuối thế kỷ 19 đầu thế kỷ 20 (Secret Societies in Southern Vietnam in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries).” MA Thesis, University of Education, HCMC.

Nguyễn, Văn Hầu, and Nguyễn Hữu Hiệp. 1956. Đức Cố Quản hay cuộc khởi nghĩa Bảy Thưa (Lord Cố Quản (Trần Văn Thành) and the Bảy Thưa Uprising). Saigon: Tân Sanh.

Nguyễn, Văn Hầu, and Nguyễn Hữu Hiệp. 1970. Nửa tháng trong miền Thất Sơn (Half a Month in in the Seven Montains). Saigon: Xuân Thu.

Nguyễn, Văn Hầu, and Nguyễn Hữu Hiệp. 1973. Sấm truyền đức Phật Thầy Tây An (Oracles of Master Buddha Tây An). Interpreted, transcripted, and annotated by Nguyễn Văn Hầu, and Nguyễn Hữu Hiệp. Sa Đéc: Tòng Sơn Temple.

Nguyễn, Văn Kiềm. 1966. Tân Châu, 1870‒1964. Unpublished.

Osborne, M. 1969. The French Presence in Cochinchina and Cambodia: Rule and Response (1859‒1905). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Ostrowski, Brian. 2010. “The Rise of Christian Nôm Literature in Seventeenth-century Vietnam: Fusing European Content and Local Expression.” In Vietnam and the West: New Approaches, edited by Wynn Wilcox, 19‒40. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.

Phạm, Bích Hợp. 2007. Người Nam Bộ và tôn giáo bản địa: Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương – Cao Đài – Hòa Hảo (Southern Vietnamese People and Indigenous Religions: Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương, Caodaism, and Hoahaoism). Hanoi: Tôn giáo.

Phan, An. 2010. “Ông Đạo – một hiện tượng tôn giáo lý thú ở Nam Bộ (Religious Masters—An Interesting Religious Phenomenon in Southern Vietnam).” Xưa và Nay (2010): 349‒50.

Purcell, Victor. 1965. The Chinese in Southeast Asia. London: Oxford University Press.

Richey, Jeffrey L. 2013. Confucius in East Asia: Confucianism’s History in China, Korea, Japan and Việt Nam. Ann Arbor: The Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

Sangren, P. Steven. 1987. “Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and the Structure of Value in Chinese Rituals.” Modern China 13 (1): 63‒89.

Sơn Nam. 1973. Lịch sử khai khẩn miền Nam (The History of Settlement in Southern Vietnam). Saigon.

Sơn Nam. 2005. Nói về miền Nam - Cá tính miền Nam - Thuần phong mỹ tục Việt Nam (Talking about Southern Vietnam—Southern Vietnamese Characteristics—Vietnamese Purified and Beautiful Customs). Ho Chi Minh City: Youth Publishers.

Sơn Nam. 2009. Tìm hiểu đất Hậu Giang và lịch sử đất An Giang (Study on Hậu Giang Land and History of An Giang). Ho Chi Minh City: Youth Publishers.

Strickmann, Michel. 2002. Chinese Magical Medicine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Sutton, S. Donald. 2007. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Ritual, Cultural Standardization, and Orthopraxy in China—Reconsidering James L. Watson’s Ideas.” Modern China 33 (1): 3‒21.

Takeuchi, Fusaji 武內房司. 2013. “Yuenan baoshan qi xiang yu “wu gong jing” – jian lun jindai zhongyue minjian zongjiao de jiaoliu 越南寶山奇香與《五公經》--兼論近代中越民間宗教的交流 (The Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương Sect of Vietnam and the Five Lord Sutras: Discussing the Vietnamese-Chinese Folk Religion Exchange in Modern Times).” 《中國秘密社會史論》History of Chinese Secret Societies, edited by Zhou Yumin. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.

Takeuchi, Fusaji 武內房司. 2019. “Baoshan qi xing’kao – zhongguo de qiannian wangguo lun yu yuenan nanbu de minjian zongjiao 寶山奇香」考--中國的千年王國論與越南南部的民間宗教 (Research on the Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương: China’s Thousand-Year Kingdom Theory and Southern Vietnam’s Folk Religion).” Translated by Sun Jiang. In Xin shixue 《新史學 》 (New History), vol. 10, edited by Cao Xinyu, 208‒22. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Taylor, Philip. 2004. Goddess on the Rise: Pilgrimage and Popular Religion in Vietnam. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Taylor, W. Keith. 1986. “Authority and Legitimacy in Eleventh-Century Vietnam.” In Southeast Asia in the 9th to 14th Centuries, edited by David Marr, and A. C. Milner, 139‒76. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Taylor, W. Keith. 2002: “Vietnamese Confucian Narratives.” In Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, edited by Benjamin A. Elman, John B. Duncan, and Herman Ooms, 337‒69. Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series.

Theam, Bun Srun. 1981. “Cambodia in the Mid-nineteenth Century: A Quest for Survival.” PhD diss., Australian National University.

Trần, Hoàng Vũ. 2011. “Vì sao gọi Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương là đạo Lành? (Why is Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương Called Đạo Lành?).” Xưa và Nay 385: 20‒21.

Trung tâm lưu trữ Quốc gia 1, and Hội Khoa học Lịch sử Việt Nam. 2019. Cuộc kháng chiến chống Pháp ở Nam Kỳ và Đồng Tháp qua châu bản triều Nguyễn (The Nguyễn Dynasty Recorded the Wars Against the French in Cochin-chine and Đồng Tháp Province). Hanoi: Hanoi Publishers.

Trường, Tạ Chí Đại. 2006 [1989]. Thần, người và đất Việt (Gods, People, and the Land of Vietnam). Westminster, CA: Văn nghệ.

Truong, Thi Thu Hang. 2011. “Doing it for Him: Religion and Tourism on Long Son Island, Ba Ria Vũng Tàu province, Vietnam.” PhD diss., University of Washington.

Uno, Koichiro宇野公一郎. 1973. “Baoshan qi xiang’shitan: Betonamu zongjiao youdong yanjiu 寶山奇香」試探:ベトナム宗教運動研究 (Wandering in the Radiant Mountain Unearthly Fragrance (Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương): Study of Vietnamese Religious Movements).” 民族學研究 Ethnological Studies 43 (4): 333‒54.

Watson, L. J. 1985. “Standardizing the Gods: The Promotion of Tien’hou (‘Empress of Heaven’) along the South China Coast (960–1960).” In Popular Culture in Late Imperial China, edited by D. Johnson, A. J. Nathan, and E. S. Rawski, 292–324. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340121.

Whitmore, K. John. 2010. “Paperwork: The Rise of the New Literati and Ministerial Power and the Effort toward Legibility in Đại Việt.” In Southeast Asia in the Fifteenth Century: The China Factor, edited by Geoff Wade, and Sun Laichen, 104‒25. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

Wolter, W. Oliver. 1996. “What Else May Ngo Si Lien Mean? A Matter of Distinctions in the Fifteenth Century.” In Sojourners and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese, edited by Anthony Reid, and Kristine Alilunas-Rodgers, 94‒147. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

Woodside, Alexander. 2002. “Classical Primordialism and the Historical Agendas of Vietnamese Confucianism.” In Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam, edited by Benjamin A. Elman, John B. Duncan, and Herman Ooms, pp. 116‒43. Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series.

Young, B. Stephen. 1998. “The Orthodox Chinese Confucian Social Paradigm Versus Vietnamese Individualism.” In Confucianism and the Family, edited by Walter H. Slote, and George A. De Vos, 137‒61. New York: State University of New York Press.

Downloads

Published

3. 09. 2024

How to Cite

Nguyen, Thanh Phong, Ngoc Tho Nguyen, and Trung Hieu Nguyen. 2024. “Mobilizing Frontiers: ‘Heretical Masters’ and Their Ideological and Religio-Political Change in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries”. Asian Studies 12 (3): 65-100. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2024.12.3.65-100.