Introduction

Authors

  • Téa SERNELJ University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2024.12.3.7-11

Keywords:

Sinic area, Confucianism, Buddhism, Western philosophies, East Asia

Abstract

Social transformations in Sinic intellectual history reveal a complex interaction among evolving cultural, philosophical, and artistic ideas and socio-political shifts. The Sinic region, encompassing areas in East and Southeast Asia influenced by Chinese script and culture—particularly Confucianism and various forms of Chinese Buddhism—includes China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, parts of Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and other neighbouring countries. The term “Sinic”, originating from the Latin word for China, highlights the shared cultural and linguistic heritage across these regions. This history illustrates how shifts in intellectual thought have continually influenced and been shaped by changes in societal structures and governance. The present publication explores the intricate relationship between the individual and the state—a theme that resonates deeply through the annals of Asian thought. This relationship, characterized by an evolving dialogue between personal autonomy and state authority, serves as the backdrop to the discussions presented in this issue. Each paper contributes to a broader understanding of how individuals have negotiated their space within the structures imposed by state ideologies, influencing and reshaping them in turn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambrogio, Selusi. 2017. “Moral Education and Ideology: The Revival of Confucian Values and the Harmonious Shaping of the New Chinese Man.” Asian Studies 5 (2): 113‒35. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.2.113-135.

Bell, Daniel. 2010. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834822.

Elstein, David. 2015. “Classical Ruist Political Thought.” In Democracy in Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, 23–41. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495186.

Huang, Chun-chieh. 2005. “How is ‘East Asian Confucianism’ Possible?” Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (1): 455–68.

Rosemont, Henry Jr., and Roger T. Ames. 2016. Confucian Role-Ethics: A Moral Vision for the 21st Century? Taibei: National Taiwan University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737006057.

Rošker, Jana S. 2017. “Between Tradition and Modernity: Modern Confucianism as a Form of East Asian Social Knowledge.” Asian Studies 5 (2): 43‒62. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.2.43-62.

Rošker, Jana S. 2022. “Sublating Sinic Relationism: On a Winding Path from Transcultural to Global Ethics.” Asian Studies 10 (3): 81‒104. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.3.81-104.

Sigurðsson, Geir. 2014. “Confucianism Vs. Modernity: Expired, Incompatible or Remedial?” Asian Studies 2 (1): 21‒38. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2014.2.1.21-38.

Yu, Kam-por, Julia Tao, and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds. 2010. Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously. New York: SUNY.

Downloads

Published

3. 09. 2024

How to Cite

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>