Mo Di and the Pacifist Humanism of Universal Love

Authors

  • Jana S. ROŠKER University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2026.14.1.399-410

Keywords:

Mo Di, Mohist school, pacifism, “universal love”, “impartial care”, “against offensive war”

Abstract

The first and most renowned representative of the Mohist school, the philosopher Mo Di 墨翟 (479–390 BCE), adopted and adapted numerous ideas from the Confucian doctrine in his theoretical framework, even though the two schools became highly critical of each other after 350 BCE. Both philosophical traditions arose from the cultural and political context of the state of Lu, where a pacifist tradition had, from the very beginning of intellectual discourse, emphasized the moral imperative of humanity, empathy, and the condemnation of aggressive wars. Despite their later divergence, the founders and lead­ing figures of these two schools—Mo Di and Confucius—both valued ethical governance grounded in merit and moral competence. Mo Di’s pacifism, however, is formulated far more systematically and radically than that of Confucius. This essay examines his con­cept of feigong 非攻 (“against offensive war”), which represents one of the earliest and most explicit rejections of aggressive military expansion in classical Chinese philosophy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brooks, Bruce in A. Taeko Brooks. 1996a. »MZ 14–16: Universal Love.« Warring States Working Group Note 92rev. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Brooks, Bruce in A. Taeko Brooks. 1996b. »MZ 17–19: Against War.« Warring States Working Group Note 93. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Brooks, Bruce in A. Taeko Brooks. 1996c. »Evolution of the Mician Ethical Triplets.« Warring States Working Group Note 94rev. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Chang, Yao-Cheng. 2021. »An Exceptional Portrait of Yang Zhu and Mozi: Beyond the Mencian Track.« Asian Studies 9 (1): 203–24. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2021.9.1.203-224.

Defoort, Carine M. G. 2020. »Five Visions of Yang Zhu Before He Became a Philosopher.« Asian Studies 8 (2): 235–56. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.2.235-256.

Durrant, Stephen W. 1977–78. »A Consideration of Differences in the Grammar of the Mo Tzu ‘Essays’ and ‘Dialogues’.« Monumenta Serica 33: 248–67.

Fraser, Chris. 2010a. »Is Mozi 17 a Fragment of Mozi 26?« Warring States Papers I: 122–25.

Fraser, Chris. 2010b. »Doctrinal Developments in in MZ 14–16.« Warring States Papers I: 132–36.

Fraser, Chris. 2010c. »Thematic Relationships in the Mozi Political Essays.« Warring States Papers I: 137–42.

Fraser, Chris. 2020. »Truth in Pre-Han Thought.« V Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic, urednik Yiu-ming Fung, 113–27. Dordrecht: Springer.

Garrett, Mary. 1993. »Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion.« Argumentation and Advocacy 29 (3): 105–15.

Geaney, Jane. 1999. »A Critique of A. C. Graham’s Reconstruction of the ‘Neo-Mohist Canons’.« Journal of the American Oriental Society 119 (1): 1–11.

Graham, A. C. 1978. Later Mohist Logic: Ethics and Science. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

Graham, A. C. 1985. Divisions in Early Mohism Reflected in the Core Chapters of Mo-tzu. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Institute of East Asian Philosophies.

Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao. LaSalle: Open Court.

Han Feizi 韓非子 (Mojster Han Fei). s. d. Chinese Text Project, »Pre-Qin in Han.« Dostop 10. avgust 2021. https://ctext.org/hanfeizi.

Hansen, Chad. 1985. »Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth’.« Journal of Asian Studies 44 (3): 491–519.

Hansen, Chad. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1993. »Conceptions of Knowledge in Ancient China.« V Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, urednika Hans Lenk in Gregor Paul, 11–33. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1998. Science and Civilisation in China, zv. 7. 1. del Language and Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lau, D. C. 1963. Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. London: Penguin.

Maeder, Erik W. 1992. »Some Observations on the Composition of the ‘Core Chapters’ of the Mozi.« Early China 17: 27–82.

Mozi 墨子 (Mojster Mo). s. d. Chinese Text Project, »Pre-Qin and Han.« Dostop 10. avgust 2025. https://ctext.org/mozi.

Munro, Donald. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Soles, David. 1999. »Mo Tzu and the Foundations of Morality.« Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1): 37–48.

Wang, Xiaowei. 2023. »From Heretic to Hedonist: Kang Youwei’s Transformation of Yang Zhu.« Asian Studies 11 (2): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.2.295-314.

Watanabe, Takashi. 1973. Kodai Chugoku shiso no kenkyu. Tokio: Sobunsha.

Yates, Robin D. S. 1980. »The Mohists on Warfare: Technology, Technique, and Justification.« Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47 (3) (tematska številka S): 549–603.

Published

9. 01. 2026

How to Cite

Rošker, Jana S. 2026. “Mo Di and the Pacifist Humanism of Universal Love”. Asian Studies 14 (1): 399-410. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2026.14.1.399-410.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>