Phenomenon of Life and Death by Dōgen and Heidegger––In View of “Embodied Cognition” in Buddhist Philosophy and Phenomenology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2015.3.1.105-128Keywords:
embodied cognition, Dōgen, Heidegger, comparative reflection, philosophy in lifeAbstract
Contrary to occidental philosophy, which is to grasp and solidify the principles of essential being (ontos on), Buddhism seeks to understand the existence of human beings and the significance of suffering in human life. In the East Asian languages human beings are described as “inter-beings” in that they are enveloped by the topos of life and death. From breath to breath, our life is bound to the moments of emerging and vanishing, being and non-being in an essential unity. Dōgen’s philosophical thinking integrated this conception with the embodied cognition of both the thinking and the acting self. In the phenomenological point of view, Heidegger, in his early work, emphasizes that being is bound to a fundamental substantiality, which borders on the Abgrund, falling into nothingness. With Dōgen, the unity-within-contrast of life and death is exemplified in our breathing because it achieves a unity of body and cognition which can be called “corpus”. In perfect contrast, the essential reflection for Heidegger is that of grasping the fundament of being in the world, which represents the actualization of a thinking-being-unity. The goal of this comparison is to fundamentally grasp what is the essentiality of being, life, and recognition (jikaku 自覚), bound to embodied cognition in our globalized world.
Downloads
References
Dōgen, Kigen. 1980. Dōgen, Shōbō genzō, (original Vols. 1–75), Vol. 1–2, edited by Yaoko Mizuno and Tōru Terada. Tokyo: Iwanami.
–––. 1993. Shōbō genzō (essential vols. including The Secret Volume), edited by Sōichi Nakamura. Tokyo: Seishin shobō.
–––. 2008. Shōbō genzō, Vols. 1–75 and others, edited by Fumio Masutani. Tokyo: Kōdansha.
Hashi, Hisaki. 2001. Was hat Zen mit Heidegger zu tun?: der komparative Denkweg von Ost und West; eine Einführung. Wien: Edition Doppelpunkt.
–––. 2004. Die Dynamik von Sein und Nichts. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.
–––. 2005.“Naturerkenntnis und Vernunfterkenntnis im 20. Jhdt.” In Intellectus universalis, edited by Werner Gabriel and Hisaki Hashi, 101–3. Wien: Edition Doppelpunkt.
–––. 2009. Zen und Philosophie: Philosophische Anthropologie Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Wien: Edition Doppelpunkt.
–––. 2011a. “Dr. Morita’s Psychophysical Therapy and the Way it is Influenced by Zen Buddhism.” In Globalisierung des Denkens in Ost und West: Resultate des Österreichisch-Japanischen Dialogs, edited by Friedrich Wallner and Hisaki Hashi, 131–47. Nordhausen: Verlag Traugott Bautz GmbH.
–––. 2011b. “Transzendenz sive Immanenz – Religionsphilosophische Ansätze im ‘Shōbō Genzō’ Dōgens.” In Religionen nach der Säkularisierung, edited by Hans Hödl and Veronika Futterknecht, 54–69. Münster and Berlin: LIT.
–––. 2012. Kyoto-Schule – Zen – Heidegger. Wien: Edition. Doppelpunkt.
–––. 2013. “Comparative Thinking as a Fundamental Method for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal for Communication and Culture 3 (1) (Spring 2013): 5–28.
–––. 2014a. Philosophische Anthropologie zur globalen Welt. Berlin: LIT.
–––. 2014b. “Cognition Embodied in Buddhist Philosophy.” Philosophy Study 2: 136–41.
Heidegger, Martin. 1943. Was ist Metaphysik? Freiburg i.Br./Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
–––. 1960. Gelassenheit. Pfullingen: Neske.
–––. 1962. Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrine and Edward Robbinson. Norwich: SCM Press.
–––. 1977. Complete works, Vol. 2. Frankfurt am Main.: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.
–––. 1990. Identität und Differenz. Pfullingen: Neske.
–––. 1993. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
–––. 1997. Complete Works, Vol. 10. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.
–––. 2006. Was ist Metaphysik? Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.
–––. 2007. Complete Works. Vol. 14. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.
Imaeda, Aishin. 1994. Dōgen. Tokyo: NHK books.
Iriya, Yoshitaka 入矢義高, and Hidehiko Koga 古賀英彦. 1991. Zengo jiten 禅語辞典 (Lexicon of the Zen Terminology). Kyoto: Shibunkaku.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. 1977 Toward the Philosophy of Zen Buddhism. Teheran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy.
–––. 1986. Philosophie des Zen-Buddhismus. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Kant, Immanuel. 1990. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by R. Schmidt. Hamburg: Meiner.
Klein, Hans-Dieter. 2005. Metaphysik. Wien: Literas.
Nāgārjuna. 2013. Mūla Madhyamaka Karikā, translated by Mark Siderits and Shōryū Katsura. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
Nagel, Thomas. (1974) 1981. “Wie ist es, eine Fledermaus zu sein?” In Analytische Philosophie des Geistes, edited by
Peter Bieri, 261–75. Königstein: Hain.
Nishida, Kitarō. 1965. Complete Works, vol 11. Tokyo: Iwanami.
Ohashi, Ryōsuke, and Georg Stenger, eds. 2013. Heidegger und Ostasiatisches Denken, München: Verlag Karl Alber.
Pietschmann, Herbert. 2003. Phänomenologie der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin: Springer.
–––. forthcoming. “Drei Grenzen der Naturwissenschaften – Kritische Philosophie der Naturwissenschaft.” In Denkdisziplinen von Ost und West, edited by Hisaki Hashi. Norhausen: T. Bautz.
Schlick, Moritz. 1986. Die Probleme der Philosophie in ihrem Zusammenhang. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Saigusa, Mitsuyoshi 三枝充悳. 1986. Bukkyō to seiyō shisō 仏教と西洋思想 (Buddhism and Western Thought). Tokyo: Shunjunsha
Steinkellner, Ernst. 2002. “Zur Lehre vom Nicht-Selbst (anātman) in frühen Buddhismus.” In Über den Begriff der Seele, edited by Johann Figl and Hans-Dieter. Klein, 171–86. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen und Neumann GmbH.
Takasaki, Jikidō. 早島鏡正, and Kyōshō Hayashima 高崎直道. 1993. Bukkyō, Indo shisō jiten 仏教・インド思想辞典 (Buddhism, Indian Encyclopedia of Indian Thought). Tokyo: shunjū-sha.
Tashiro, Nobutada 田代信維. 2005. Morita Ryōhō nyūmon. “Ikiru” to iu koto. 森田療法入門 : 「生きる」ということ (Introduction to the Morita Therapy). Tokyo: Sōgensha.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.