The Concept of Self in Buddhism and Brahmanism: Some Remarks

Andrej ULE

doi:10.4312/as.2016.4.1.81-95

Authors

Andrej ULE Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2016.4.1.81-95

Keywords:

Buddhism, Brahmanism, self, non-self, consciousness, knowledge

Abstract

I contrast briefly the Buddhist concept of Self as a process and a conditional reality with the concept of the substantial metaphysical concept of Self in Brahmanism and Hinduism. I present the criticism of the Buddhist thinkers, such as Nāgārjuna, who criticize any idea of the metaphysical Self. They deny the idea of the Self as its own being or as a possessor of its mental acts. However, they do not reject all sense of Self; they allow a pure process of knowledge (first of all, Self-knowledge) without a fixed subject or “owner” of knowledge. This idea is in a deep accord with some Chan stories and paradoxes of the Self and knowledge.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Candrakīrti. 1979. Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Choi, Dukkyu. 2011. Mechanisms of Conscousness during Life, Dream and Afterdeath. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

De Smet, Richard S.J. 1974. “Towards an Indian View of the Person.” In Contemporary Indian Philosophy, edited by M. Chatterjee, 51–75. Series II. London: George Allen/Unwin.

Descartes, Rene. 1979. Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge: Hackett Publ. Comp., Indianapolis.

Deussen, Paul. 1973. The System of the Vedānta. New York: Dover Publ.

Harvey, Peter. 1995. The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvana in Early Buddhism. Richmond: Curzon.

Hilmy, Stephen. S. 1987. The Later Wittgenstein. Oxford: B. Blackwell.

Katz, Nathan. 1974. “Notes: Dependent Origination, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility.” Bulletin of Tibetology 11 (1): 24–26.

Miura, Isshu, and Ruth Fuller Sassaki. 1965. The Zen Koan. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Nāgārjuna. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, translated by J. L. Garfield. Oxford, New York:Oxford University Press.

Sogyal, Rinpoche. 2002. The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying. New York: Harper-Collins.

Tripathi, Chhote Lal. 1972. The Problem of Knowledge in Yogācāra Buddhism. Varanasi: Bharat-Bharati.

The Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra. 1999. Translated by K. Yamomoto, revised by T. Page. London: Nirvana Publications. Accessed November 2, 2015. ttp://info.stiltij.nl/publiek/meditatie/soetras/mahaparinirvana.pdf.

Ule, Andrej, ed. 2008. “Transcendental Arguments on the Self in Indian and in European Philosophy.” In Circles of Analysis. Essays on Logic, Mind and Knowledge, 192–205.Wien, Berlin: LIT.

Buddhaghosa, Himi. 1999. Visuddhimagga (Path of Purification). Translated by Nyanamoli Himi. Colombo: Ananda Semage.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. Routledge/ Kegan Paul, London

–––. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.