Medkulturna problematika vzhodnoazijskih študij ter vprašanje tradicije in modernosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2016.4.2.171-182Keywords:
Asian studies, modernization, intercultural researchAbstract
The article explores and introduces some of the crucial problems linked to Asian studies, from the viewpoint of intercultural methodology. The author explains why the mastering of Asian languages in the research process is of central importance, for it allows us, among other things, to apply and incorporate into the research original, primary sources from these regions. Through the lens of such methodological issues, the article then explores some central problems of Asian modernization and the question of whether this can really be equated with Westernization. The author concludes that modernization is a process, which includes universal, as well as culturally determined elements.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adorno, Theodor W. in Max Horkheimer. 1947. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam: Querido Verlag.
Dessein, Bart 2016. “Progress and Free Will: On the Buddhist Concept of ‘Time’ and Its Possibilities for Modernity.” Asian Studies 4 (1): 11–33.
Dirlik, Arif. 1994. After the Revolution: Working to Global Capitalism. Hanover, London: Wesleyan University Press.
–––. 2001. “Postmodernism and Chinese History.” Boundary 4 (28): 19–60.
–––. 2002. “Modernity as History: Post-Revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity.” Social History 27 (1): 16–39.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129 (1): 1–29.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation – Politische Essays. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1986. Jenaer Schriften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, Eric in Terence Ranger, ur. 1995. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lukàcs, György. 1986. Zgodovina in razredna zavest: študije o marksistični dialektiki Ljubljana: Inštitut za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU.
Marx, Karl. 2012. Ökonomisch philosophische Mauskripte. Reihe marxistischer Klassiker. Internationale Sozialisten. Dostop 17. januar, 2016. http://www. mlwerke.de/ies/ueber.htm.
Rošker, Jana S. 2006 Na ozki brvi razumevanja – metodologija medkulturnih raziskav v sinoloških študijah. Ljubljana: Oddelek za azijske in afriške študije, Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Weber, Max. 1989. Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebek).
Zhang, Dainian 張岱年. 2003. Zhongguo zhexue shi fangfalun fa fan 中國哲學史 方法論發凡. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Dessein, Bart 2016. “Progress and Free Will: On the Buddhist Concept of ‘Time’ and Its Possibilities for Modernity.” Asian Studies 4 (1): 11–33.
Dirlik, Arif. 1994. After the Revolution: Working to Global Capitalism. Hanover, London: Wesleyan University Press.
–––. 2001. “Postmodernism and Chinese History.” Boundary 4 (28): 19–60.
–––. 2002. “Modernity as History: Post-Revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity.” Social History 27 (1): 16–39.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129 (1): 1–29.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation – Politische Essays. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1986. Jenaer Schriften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, Eric in Terence Ranger, ur. 1995. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lukàcs, György. 1986. Zgodovina in razredna zavest: študije o marksistični dialektiki Ljubljana: Inštitut za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU.
Marx, Karl. 2012. Ökonomisch philosophische Mauskripte. Reihe marxistischer Klassiker. Internationale Sozialisten. Dostop 17. januar, 2016. http://www. mlwerke.de/ies/ueber.htm.
Rošker, Jana S. 2006 Na ozki brvi razumevanja – metodologija medkulturnih raziskav v sinoloških študijah. Ljubljana: Oddelek za azijske in afriške študije, Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Weber, Max. 1989. Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebek).
Zhang, Dainian 張岱年. 2003. Zhongguo zhexue shi fangfalun fa fan 中國哲學史 方法論發凡. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Downloads
Published
10.08.2016
How to Cite
ROŠKER, J. S. (2016). Medkulturna problematika vzhodnoazijskih študij ter vprašanje tradicije in modernosti. Asian Studies, 4(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2016.4.2.171-182
Issue
Section
ASIAN STUDIES IN SLOVENIA
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Jana S. ROŠKER
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
