Medkulturna problematika vzhodnoazijskih študij ter vprašanje tradicije in modernosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2016.4.2.171-182Keywords:
Asian studies, modernization, intercultural researchAbstract
The article explores and introduces some of the crucial problems linked to Asian studies, from the viewpoint of intercultural methodology. The author explains why the mastering of Asian languages in the research process is of central importance, for it allows us, among other things, to apply and incorporate into the research original, primary sources from these regions. Through the lens of such methodological issues, the article then explores some central problems of Asian modernization and the question of whether this can really be equated with Westernization. The author concludes that modernization is a process, which includes universal, as well as culturally determined elements.
Downloads
References
Dessein, Bart 2016. “Progress and Free Will: On the Buddhist Concept of ‘Time’ and Its Possibilities for Modernity.” Asian Studies 4 (1): 11–33.
Dirlik, Arif. 1994. After the Revolution: Working to Global Capitalism. Hanover, London: Wesleyan University Press.
–––. 2001. “Postmodernism and Chinese History.” Boundary 4 (28): 19–60.
–––. 2002. “Modernity as History: Post-Revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity.” Social History 27 (1): 16–39.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129 (1): 1–29.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation – Politische Essays. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1986. Jenaer Schriften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, Eric in Terence Ranger, ur. 1995. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lukàcs, György. 1986. Zgodovina in razredna zavest: študije o marksistični dialektiki Ljubljana: Inštitut za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU.
Marx, Karl. 2012. Ökonomisch philosophische Mauskripte. Reihe marxistischer Klassiker. Internationale Sozialisten. Dostop 17. januar, 2016. http://www. mlwerke.de/ies/ueber.htm.
Rošker, Jana S. 2006 Na ozki brvi razumevanja – metodologija medkulturnih raziskav v sinoloških študijah. Ljubljana: Oddelek za azijske in afriške študije, Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Weber, Max. 1989. Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebek).
Zhang, Dainian 張岱年. 2003. Zhongguo zhexue shi fangfalun fa fan 中國哲學史 方法論發凡. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Jana S. ROŠKER
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.