From Marx and Engels to Sino-Marxism  Focusing on Communist and Confucian (rujia) Notions of Loyalty and Self-Criticism

Gregor Paul

doi:10.4312/as.2021.9.1.263-280

Authors

Gregor Paul Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Department of Philosophy, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2021.9.1.263-280

Keywords:

Marxism, Maoism, rujia (so-called Confucianism), loyalty, self-criticism

Abstract

The paper sketches and compares main components of Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, and Sino-Marxism, especially Maoism. In particular, it deals with the relation between Maoism and so-called Confucianism (rujia). It is argued that this relation has been—and still is—characterized by both Maoist criticism of Confucius as well as absorption of ‘Confucian’ ideas. In briefly analysing commonalities and differences between the various theories and ‘practices’, especially the ways the Communist Party of China conceived of and asked for loyalty to the Party, reasons are given for their development, achievements, and failures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altinok, Ozan Altan. 2019. “Mao’s Marxist Negation of Marxism.” Asian Studies 7 (1): 75–96.

Bauer, Wolfgang. 1990. Das Antlitz Chinas. München: Hanser.

Brecht, Bertold. 2004. Die Dreigroschenoper. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Beijing Academy of Wang Yangming Philosophy, ed. 2018. Cultural Confidence & National Rejuvenation. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.

Dessein, Bart. 2019. “Guo Moruo on Marx and Confucius.” Asian Studies 7 (1): 129–51.

van Ess, Hans. 2016. “Sinomarxismus und Konfuzianismus: Ein dialektisches Verhältnis.” In Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus?, edited by Harro von Senger, and Marcel Senn, 55–74. Stuttgart: Steiner.

Guo, Moruo. 1999. “Marx Enters the Confucian Temple.” Renditions 51: 77–86. Translated by Matthew Finkbeiner, and John Timothy Wixted. Accessed July 10, 2020. http://c1180008.ferozo.com/pdf/203.pdf.

Krawczyk, Adrian. 2019. “Marxist Theories of Ideology in Contemporary China.” Asian Studies 7 (1): 153–72.

Li, Zehou. 1994. The Path of Beauty. Translated by Gong Lizheng. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

——. 2010. The Chinese Aesthetic Tradition. Translated from Huaxia meixue (1989) by Maija Bell Samei. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

——. 2018. A New Approach to Kant: A Confucian-Marxist’s Viewpoint. Translated from Pipan zhexuede pipan (1st edition 1979) by Jeanne Haizhen Allen, and Christopher Ahn. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

——. 2020. A History of Classical Chinese Thought. Translated, with a philosophical introduction, by Andrew Lambert. New York, London: Routledge.

Li, Zehou, and Jane Cauvel. 2006. Four Essays on Aesthetics: Toward a Global Perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Liu, Shaoqi. 1939. “How to be a Good Communist: Primary Source with Questions.” In Selected Works of Liu Shaoqi, vol. I, edited and translated by DBQs. Published Online in February 2004. Accessed July 10, 2020.

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/china/liu_shaoqi_good_communist.pdf.

Louie, Kam. 1986. Inheriting Tradition: Interpretations of the Classical Philosophers in Communist China, 1949–1966. Hong Kong, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mao, Tse-Tung [Mao Zedong]. 2007. On Practice and Contradiction. (Introduction by Slavoj Žižek). London: Verso.

Marx, Karl. 1959. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

——. 1969. Theses on Feuerbach. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

——. 2015. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I, Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. Translated by Samuel Moore, and Edward Aveling, edited by Frederick Engels. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

——. n.d. “Die entfremdete Arbeit.” In Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. Accessed March 6, 2020.

http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Marx,+Karl/%C3%96konomisch-philosophische+Manuskripte+aus+dem+Jahre+1844/%5B1.+Manuskript%5D/Die+entfremdete+Arbeit.

Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1969. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Marx/Engels Selected Works, vol. 1, 98–137. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Paul, Gregor. 1990. Aspects of Confucianism. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.

——. 2013. “Confucian Universalism as a Driving Force of Humanity: The Timeless Lesson of Japanese Confucianism.” In Confucianism in Intercultural Perspectives: Modern Developments. Papers from the Fourth International Conference of Sinology. Taipei: Academia Sinica.

Roetz, Heiner. 2016. “Der antike Legalismus – eine Quelle des modernen Totalitarismus?” In Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus?, edited by Harro von Senger, and Marcel Senn, 75–100. Stuttgart: Steiner.

Rošker, Jana S., 2018. “From Humanized Nature to Naturalized Humans: Li Zehou’s Transformation of the Classical Chinese ‘Tianren Heyi’ Paradigm Through the Lens of Kant and Early Marx.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 13 (1): 72–90.

Schickel, Joachim, 1976. Konfuzius: Materialien zu einer Jahrhundert-Debatte. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

von Senger, Harro, and Marcel Senn, eds. 2016. Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus? Stuttgart: Steiner.

von Senger, Harro. 2016a. “Der Sinomarxismus zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts.” In Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus?, edited by Harro von Senger, and Marcel Senn, 121–72. Stuttgart: Steiner.

von Senger, Harro. 2016b. “‘Pragmatismus’ und ‘Maoismus’: Rückblick auf die Tagung Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus?” In Maoismus oder Sinomarxismus?, edited by Harro von Senger, and Marcel Senn, 245–85. Stuttgart: Steiner.

Sernelj, Téa. 2019. “Modern Confucian Objection Against Communism in China.” Asian Studies 7 (1): 99–113.