The Philosophical Sinification of Modernity and the Modern Confucian Paradigm of Immanent Transcendence (內在超越性)

Authors

  • Jana S. ROŠKER FILOZOFSKA FAKULTETA UL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2014.2.1.67-81

Keywords:

Modern Confucianism, modernization theories, immanent transcendence

Abstract

As a major source of social values, Modern Confucian theory assumes essential significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in contemporary China. This current is distinguished by a multifaceted attempt to revitalize traditional thought by means of new influences borrowed or derived from Western systems. It defines itself with a search for a synthesis between “Western” and traditional Chinese thought, aiming to elaborate a new system of ideas and values, suitable for the modern, globalized society. The present contribution examines the ways in which 3rd generation of Modern Confucian philosophers changed the framework within which traditional Chinese philosophical inquiry has been carried out, exposing the importance of immanent transcendence.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jana S. ROŠKER, FILOZOFSKA FAKULTETA UL

Professor of Sinology, department of Asian and African Studies, Faculty of Arts, Ljubljana Unviersity

References

Cui, Qingtian 崔清田, and Gongyi Wen 溫公頤, eds. 2001. Zhongguo luoji jiaocheng 中國邏輯史教程 (A Tutorial in the History of Chinese Logic). Tianjin: Nankai daxue chuban she.

Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Izbrani spisi. Translated by Tine Hribar, and Uroš Grilc. Ljubljana: Študentska organizacija univerze (Krt).

Fang, Dongmei 方東美. 2004. Zhongguo zhexue jingshen jiqi fazhan 中國哲學精神及其發展 (The Spirit and the Development of Chinese Philosophy). Taibei: Liming wenhua.

Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao – Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.

Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1969. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

Jaspers, Karl. 2003. The Way to Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Lee, Ming-Huei 李明輝. 2001. Dangdai ruxuede ziwo zhuanhua 當代儒學的自我轉化 (The Self- transformation of Contemporary Modern Confucianism). Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chuban she.

Liao, Xiaoping 寥小平. 1994. Lun Zhongguo chuantong zhexue daode renshilunde tezheng 論中國傳統哲學道德認識論的特質 (On the Special Characteristics of Traditional Chinese Philosophical Moral Epistemology). Hebei: Hebei Xuekan 河北學看. 4: 43–47.

Liu, Shuxian 劉述先. 2005. “Chaoyue yu neizai wentide zai shengsi 超越與內在問題的再省思 (A Rethinking of the Problem of Immanence and Inherence ).” In Dangdai ruxue yu xifang wenhua – zongjiao bian 當代儒學與西方文化 (Contemporary Confucianism and Western Culture), edited by Liu Shuxian and Lin Yuehui, 11–43. Taibei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan – Zhongguo wenzhe yanjiusuo.

Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1975. Xianxiang yu wu zishen 現象與物自身 (Phenomena and the Things in Themselves). Taibei: Xuesheng shuju.

–––. 1983. Zhongguo zhexue shijiu jiang 中國哲學十九講 (Nineteen Lectures in Chinese Philosophy). Taibei: Xuesheng shuju.

Ng, Yau-Nang William. 1996. “T’ang Chun-I’s idea of Transcendence.” PhD Disertation. Toronto: University of Toronto

Rošker, Jana S. 2012. Traditional Chinese Philosophy and the Paradigm of Structure (Li). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Sin, Yee Chan. 2002. “Tang Junyi: Moral Idealism and Chinese Culture.” In Contemporary Chinese Philosophy, edited by Cheng Chung-Ying and Nicholas Bunnin, 235–346. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Tang, Junyi 唐君毅. 2000. Renwen jingshenzhi chongjian 人文精神之重建 (The Reconstruction of the Humanistic Spirit). Taipei: Xuesheng shuju.

Weber, Max. 1989. Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebek).

Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. 2005. Zhongguo renxing lun shi 中國人性論史. Beijing: Huadong shifan daxue chuban she.

Zhuangzi 莊子. 2012. In Chinese Text Project. Pre-Qin and Han. Accessed July 7, 2012, http://chinese.dsturgeon.net/text.pl?node=3925&if=en

Downloads

Published

30.05.2014

How to Cite

ROŠKER, J. S. (2014). The Philosophical Sinification of Modernity and the Modern Confucian Paradigm of Immanent Transcendence (內在超越性). Asian Studies, 2(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2014.2.1.67-81

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>