What’s Wrong with the Study of China/Countries

Authors

  • Hans KUIJPER

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2014.2.1.151-185

Keywords:

Sinology, area/country studies, complexity, scientific collaboration, e-research

Abstract

In this paper the thesis is submitted that there is something fundamentally amiss in Western Sinology (Zhōngguóxué, as distinct from Hànxué, which is a kind of old-fashioned philology): ‘China experts’ either pretend to be knowledgeable about everything related to China, in which case they cannot be taken seriously, or–– eventually––admit not to be scientific all-rounders with respect to the country, in which case they cannot be called ‘China experts’. The author expects no tenured professor of Chinese Studies/History to share this view. Having exposed the weakness, indeed the scandal of old-style Sinology, he also points out the way junior Sinologists should go. The fork in that road is two-pronged: translating or collaborating.

 

 

 

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, Peter, Steve Maguire, and Bill McKelvey, eds. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Anandarajan, Murugan, and Asokan Anandarajan, eds. 2010. e-Research Collaboration. Berlin: Springer.

Atkinson, Rita, Richard Atkinson, Edward Smith, Daryl Bem, and Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. 1999. Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Bammer, Gabriele. 2013. Disciplining Interdisciplinarity. Canberra: ANU Press.

Batty, Michel. 2013. The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Béziau, Jean-Yves, and Katarzyna Gan-Krzywoszynska, eds. 2014. New Dimensions of the Square of Opposition. München: Philosophia Verlag.

Bhaskar, Roy, Cheryl Frank, Karl-Georg Høyer, Petter Naess, and Jenneth Parker, eds. 2010. Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change. London: Routledge.

Blitstein, Pablo. 2008. “A New Debate about Alterity”. Accessed on May 1st 2014, www.uba.ar/ceca/newsletters/diciembre_08/newsletter-english_diciembre_08.php.

Bourgine, Paul. 2013. “Complex Systems Science as a New Transdisciplinary Science”. Accessed on May 1st 2014, www.diplomacyandforeignaffairs.com/complex-systems-science-as-a-new-transdisciplinary-science.

Byrne, David, and Gill Callaghan. 2014. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

Caplat, Guy. 2008. Modèles et métamodèles. Lausanne: PPUR.

Capra, Fritjof, and Pier Luisi. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: CUP.

Chaitin, Gregory. 2005. Metamaths: The Quest for Omega. London: Atlantic Books.

Cheng, Anne. 1997. Histoire de la pensée chinoise. Paris: Seuil.

Cheng, Chung-Ying, and Nicholas Bunnin, eds. 2002. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.

Critchley, Simon, and William Schroeder, eds. 1999. A Companion to Continental Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cua, Antonio, ed. 2003. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Descombes, Vincent. 2013. Les embarrass de l’identité. Paris: Gallimard.

Dutton, William, and, Paul Jeffrieseds. 2010. World Wide Research: Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ehrlich, Paul, and Anne Ehrlich. 2013. “Can a Collapse of Global Civilization Be Avoided?” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280 (1754), March 7: 1–9.

–—. 2013. “Future Collapse: How Optimistic Should We Be?”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280 (1767), September 22: 1–2.

Elkana, Yehuda, and Hannes Klöpper. 2012. Die Universität im 21. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Körber-Stiftung.

Feng, Youlan. 1953. A History of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. II. Translated by Derk Bodde. Princeton, NJ: PUP.

Flanagan, Thomas, and Alexander Christakis. 2010. The Talking Point: Creating an Environment for Exploring Complex Meaning. Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.

Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: OUP.

Fraser, Chris. 2014. Chinese Philosophy: An Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.

French, Steven. 2014. The Structure of the World. Oxford: OUP.

Frodeman, Robert, Julie Thompson Klein, and Carl Mitcham, eds. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gasser, Georg, and Matthias Stefan, eds. 2013. Personal Identity: Complex or Simple? Cambridge: CUP.
G
ray, Wayne, ed. 2007. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems. New York: OUP.

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, ed. 2011. The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research. New York: OUP.

Heywood, Andrew. 2007. Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hofkirchner, Wolfgang, ed. 2009 ff. Exploring Unity through Diversity. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.

Jacobs, Jerry. 2014. In Defense of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ji, Sungchul. 2012. Molecular Theory of the Living Cell. New York: Springer.

Johnson, Jeffrey. 2014. Hypernetworks in the Science of Complex Systems. Singapore: World Scientific.

Jullien, François. 2007. La pensée chinoise dans le miroir de la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.

Kelly, Michael. 2013. “Why a Collapse of Global Civilization Can Be Avoided: A Comment on Ehrlich & Ehrlich”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280 (1767), September 22: 1–3.

Krausz, Michael, ed. 2010. Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Krummel, John. 2010. “Transcendent or Immanent? Significance and History of Li in Confucianism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37(3): 417–37.

Kuijper, Hans. 2000. “Is Sinology a Science?” China Report 36(3): 331–54.

—–. 2013. “The Modernisation of China”. www.academia.edu (fill in author’s name).

–—. 2014. “Perception: An Interdisciplinary Essay”. www.academia.edu (fill in author’s name).

Lai, Karyn. 2008. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: CUP.

Lisin, Dimitri. 1995. “Philosopher of Freedom”. Accessed May 1st, 2014, http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~dima/mytexts/suff.html.

Liu, Jeeloo. 2005. “The Status of Cosmic Principle (li) in Neo-Confucian Metaphysics”. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32(3): 391–407.

Mathieu, Nicole, and Anne-Françoise Schmid, eds. 2014. Modélisation et interdisciplinarité. Paris: Quæ.

Mayaram, Shail, ed. 2014. Philosophy as Saṃvāda and Svarāj: Dialogical Meditations on Daya Krishna and Ramchandra Gandhi. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McCabe, Viki. 2014. Coming to Our Senses: Perceiving Complexity to Avoid Catastrophes. New York: OUP.

Montuori, Alfonso. 2013. “Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: Reflections on Theory and Practice”. Accessed May 1st, 2014, www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02604027. 2013.803349?journalCode=gwof20.

Mou, Bo, ed. 2009. History of Chinese Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Newman, Mark. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: OUP.

Nielsen, Michael. 2012. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, NJ: PUP.

O’Grady, William, John Archibald, Mark Aronoff, and Janie
Rees-Miller. 2009. Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin’s.

Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Parker, Jenneth. 2014. Critiquing Sustainability, Changing Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Ramage, Magnus, and Karen Shipp. 2009. Systems Thinkers. London: Springer.

Ramchand, Gillian, and Charles Reiss, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP.

Reck, Erich, ed. 2013. The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rose, Nikolas, and Joelle Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton, NJ: PUP.

Rošker, Jana. 2012. Traditional Chinese Philosophy and the Paradigm of Structure (Li 理). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Samuelson, Paul, and William Nordhaus. 2009. Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schelling, Friedrich von. 1809. “Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit”. Accessed May 1st 2014: www.hs-augsburg.de/~harsch /germanica/Chronologie/19Jh/Schelling/sch_frei.html.

Soames, Scott. 2014. The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy, Vol. I: The Founding Giants. Princeton, NJ: PUP.

Starr, Cecie, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, and Lisa Starr. 2013. The Unity and Diversity of Life. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Straub, Jürgen. 2004. “Identität”, Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften Vol. I, edited by Jaeger, Friedrich and Liebsch, Burkhard, 277– 303. Grundlagen und Schlüsselbegriffe. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler,.

Taylor, Mark. 2001. The Moment of Complexity: Emerging Network Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thorén, Henrik, and Johannes Persson. 2013. “The Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity”. Accessed May 1st 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-013-9233-5.

Wolf-Branigin, Michael. 2013. Using Complexity Theory for Research and Program Evaluation. New York: OUP.
Zufferey, Nicolas

Downloads

Published

30. 05. 2014

How to Cite

KUIJPER, Hans. 2014. “What’s Wrong With the Study of China Countries”. Asian Studies 2 (1): 151-85. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2014.2.1.151-185.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 210

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.