Chinese Philosophy of Life, Relational Ethics and the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2021.9.3.323-340Keywords:
COVID-19, pandemic, Chinese ethics, Confucian ethics, relational self, role ethics, relationalismAbstract
This paper investigates the relation between different models of ethics and their impact upon crises solution strategies. Because COVID-19 is a global-scale crisis, it has to be solved on the global level. In this framework, it is important to consider knowledge and ethical theories from different cultures. The paper outlines some theoretical groundworks for alternative models of social ethics from the perspective of traditional Chinese, particularly Confucian, philosophies. Among other issues, this perspective is meaningful because in the Sinitic areas the pandemic has so far been brought under control much quicker and more effectively than in other regions of the world. First, the paper introduces the Chinese philosophy of life and highlights its current relevance; then, it presents traditional Chinese models of relational and anti-essentialist concepts of the self and investigates their impact to the Confucian models of social ethics. On this basis, it illuminates some new ways of understanding interpersonal and intercultural interactions that might help us develop new strategies against current and future pandemics.
Downloads
References
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Chen, Lai. 2014. »Renxue benti lun 仁学本体论 (Ontologija človečnosti).« Wen shi zhe 文史哲 (4): 41–65.
Cline, Erin. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the Sense of Justice. New York: Fordham University Press.
D’Ambrosio, Paul. 2016. »Approaches to Global Ethics: Michael Sandel’s Justice and Li Zehou’s Harmony.« Philosophy East and West 66 (3): 720–38.
Escobar, Pepe. 2020 »Confucius is Winning the Covid-19 Wa.« Asia Times, 13. april 2020. https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/confucius-is-winning-the-covid-19-war/. Dostop 20. april 2020.
Fan, Ruiping. 2010. Reconstructionist Confucianism—Rethinking Morality after the West. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fang Keli 方克立 in Li Jinquan 李錦全, ur. 1995. Xiandai xin ruxue xue’an 现代新儒家学案 (Študije modernega novokonfucijanstva), zv. 3. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chuban she.
Fang, Thomé H. (Fang Dongmei 方東美). 1936: Kexue, zhexue yu rensheng 科學， 哲學與人生 (Znanost, filozofija in človeško življenje). Beijing: Shangwu yinshu guan.
———. 1957. The Chinese View of Life. Hong Kong: The Union Press.
———. 1982. Zhongguo rensheng zhexue (Fang Dongmei quanji zhi yi) 中國人生哲學 (方東美全集之一) (Kitajska filozofija življenja) (Kitajska filozofija življenja: Zbrana dela Fang Dongmeija, prvi zvezek). Taibei: Liming wenhua shiye gongsi.
———. 1984. Zhongguo zhexuede jingsheng jiqi fazhan 中國哲學的精神及其發展 (Duh in razvoj kitajske filozofije). Taibei: Chengjun chuban she.
———. 2004. Zhongguo zhexue jingshen jiqi fazhan - xia中國哲學精神及其發展 – 下 (Duh in razvoj kitajske filozofije, drugi del). Taibei: Liming wenhua chuban she.
Hall, David L. in Roger T. Ames. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2020. »La emergencia viral y el mundo de mañana.« El País, 22. marec 2020. https://elpais.com/ideas/2020-03-21/la-emergencia-viral-y-el-mundo-de-manana-byung-chul-han-el-filosofo-surcoreano-que-piensa-desde-berlin.html. Dostop 17. april 2020.
Jia, Jinhua. 2018. »Li Zehou’s Reconception of Confucian Ethics of Emotion.« V Li Zehou and Confucian Philosophy, uredila Roger T. Ames in Jia Jinhua, 155–86. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Jung, Carl Gustav. 1976. »Symbols of Transformation.« V Collected Works of C. G. Jung, 5. zv., prevedel R. F. C. Hull. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Lai, Karyn. 2008. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
———. 2018. »Global Thinking. Karyn Lai’s Thoughts on New Waves in Anglo Chinese Philosophy.« The Philosopher’s Magazine 2018 (1): 64–69.
Li, Zehou. 2016a. »A Response to Michael Sandel and Other Matters.« Prevedla Paul D’Ambrosio in Robert A. Carleo. Philosophy East and West 66 (4): 1068–47.
Li Zehou 李澤厚. 2016b. »Guanyu Makeside lunli ji qita (xia) 關於馬克思的倫理及其他 (下) (Marksistična etika in drugo, drugi del).« Tongsu wenda—zai tan makesizhuyu zai Zhongguo, 2. maj 2016. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_63959b6d010182uw.html. Dostop 22. maj 2016.
Li Zehou 李泽厚 in Liu Yuedi 刘悦笛. 2014. »Cong ‘qing benti’ fansi zhengzhi zhexue 从 「情本体」反思政治哲学 (Reflektiranje politične filozofije z vidika ‘emotivne substance’).« Kaifang shidai 4: 194–215.
Mansouri, Fethi. 2020. »The Socio-Cultural Impact of COVID-19: Exploring the Role of Intercultural Dialogue in Emerging Responses.« UNESCO—Building Peace in the Minds of Men and Women, 8. september 2020: 1—16. https://en.unesco.org/news/intercultural-dialogue-during-pandemic-impact-and-response. Dostop 18. november 2020.
Mengzi 孟子 [Master Meng, Mencius]. s. d. Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Mengzi. http://ctext.org/mengzi. Dostop 1. november 2020.
Oviedo, Atawallpa. 2020. »Cooperation and Solidarity, between Slavoj Žižek and Byung Chul Han.« Latin America in Movement, 2. april 2020. https://www.alainet.org/en/articulo/205649. Dostop 8. junij 2020.
Rosemont, Henry Jr. in Roger T. Ames. 2016. Confucian Role-Ethics. A Moral Vision for the 21st Century? Taibei: National Taiwan University Press.
Rošker, Jana S. 2012. »Cultural Conditionality of Comprehension: The Perception of Autonomy in China.« In Reinventing Identities: The Poetics of Language Use in Contemporary China, urednili Tian Hailong 田海龍, Cao Qing 曹清, et al., 26–42. Tianjin: Nankai daxue chuban she.
Rošker, Jana S. 2020. Becoming Human. Li Zehou’s Ethics. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
Sernelj, Téa. 2020. »Different Approaches to Chinese Aesthetics.« Asian Studies 8 (3): 161–82.
Shen, Vincent. 2003. »Fang Dongmei (Thomé H. Fang).« V Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, uredil Antonio S. Cua, 249–52. New York: Routledge.
Spartz, James J. 2020. »Individualism vs. Individuation.« Blog, 26. januar 2016. https://jtspartz.medium.com/individualism-vs-individuation-cfee420bc5be. Dostop 17. november 2020.
Wang, Keping. 2020. »Thomé Fang’s Pursuit of a Cultural Ideal.« Asian Studies 8 (3): 183–207.
Wang, Qiong. 2016. »The Relational Self and the Confucian Familial Ethics.« Asian Philosophy 26 (3): 193–205.
Zhou yi 周易 [Knjiga premen]. s. d. Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Zhou yi. https://ctext.org/book-of-changes. Dostop 11. november 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jana S. ROŠKER
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
