With Lyre and Flute
Pindar in Antiquity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/clotho.7.1.5-24Keywords:
Greek lyrics, Pindar, epinician, Callimachus, HoraceAbstract
The discussion deals with Pindar, the greatest Greek lyric poet, who was called princeps lyricorum by Quintilian. Of Pindar’s poetic genres, only the epinicians, songs in honor of the victors of the Panhellenic games, have survived. However, they have not survived in their original form, in which the poem existed together with music and dance. Only the text came down to us from Pindar’s epinicians, and it was only Alexandrian scholarship that established it with the triadic stanzaic structure on the basis of the available manuscripts. In the Alexandrian edition, each of Pindar’s epinicians has its own foot combinations in strophes, antistrophes and epodes, but at the same time also interstrophic and interepodic responsions. The discussion then focuses on the reception of Pindar’s poetry by Callimachus, the most characteristic Greek poet of the Hellenistic period, and by Horace, the most famous Roman lyricist. It points out Callimachus’ application of Pindar’s principle of ‘elaborating little in what is much’ as regards the presentation of myth, while in Horace it highlights the image of Pindar as a raging mountain river. In Horace’s image, that of the metrical wild man, Pindar shows a Dionysian face instead of the enigmatic Apollonian one he showed to the Alexandrian scholars. This duality also characterizes the later reception of Pindar in the West.
Downloads
References
Burckhardt, Jakob. Griechische Kulturgeschichte, zv. 2: Künste und Forschung. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1952.
Clayman, Dee L., ur. in prev. Callimachus: Aetia / Iambi / Lyric Poems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Clayman, Dee L., ur. in prev. Callimachus: Hecale / Hymns / Epigrams. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Des Places, Édouard. Le pronom chez Pindare. Pariz: Librairie C. Klincksieck, 1947.
Dornseiff, Franz. Pindars Stil. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1921.
Drachmann, Aage B. Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina, zv. 1: Scholia in Olympionicas. Leipzig: Teubner, 1903.
Fowler, Robert L. Pindar and the Sublime. Greek Myth, Reception, and Lyric Experience. London itn.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.
Freis, Richard. »The Catalogue of Pindaric Genres in Horace Ode 4.2«. Classical Antiquity 2.1 (1983): 27–36.
Fuhrer, Therese. Die Auseinandersetzung mit den Chorlyrikern in den Epinikien des Kallimachos. Basel in Kassel: Friedrich Reinhardt Verlag, 1992.
Fyfe, W. H. in Donald Russell, ur. Longinus: On the Sublime. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Gantar, Kajetan, prev. Longin: O vzvišenem. Ljubljana: Modrijan, 2011.
Gantar, Kajetan, prev. Aristotel: Poetika. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba, 1982.
Gantar, Kajetan , prev. Publij Ovidij Naso: Metamorfoze. Izbor. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 1977.
Gerber, Douglas E. »General Introduction«. V: A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets, ur. Douglas E. Gerber, 1–9. Leiden, New York in Köln: Brill, 1997.
Grošelj, Nada, prev. William Butler Yeats: Zbrana poezija 2. Lirika 1919–1928. Ljubljana: Književno društvo Hiša poezije, 2015.
Hellingrath, Norbert von. Pindarübertragungen von Hölderlin. Prolegomena zu einer Erstausgabe. Jena: Eugen Diederichs, 1911.
Hopkinson, Neil, prev. Theocritus – Moschus – Bion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Irigoin, Jean. Histoire du texte de Pindar. Pariz: C. Klincksieck, 1952.
Kampakoglou, Alexandros. Studies in the Reception of Pindar in Ptolemaic Poetry. Berlin in Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2019.
Kocijančič, Gorazd, prev. Platon: Fajdon. V: Zbrana dela, zv. 1, ur. Gorazd Kocijančič, 111–161. Celje: Mohorjeva družba, 2004.
Kugel, James L. The Idea of Biblical Poetry. Parallelism and Its History. Baltimore in London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Nagy, Gregory. »Early Greek Views of Poets and Poetry«. V: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, zv. 1: Classical Criticism, ur. George A. Kennedy, 1–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Rawles, Richard. Callimachus. London itn.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Rudd, Niall, prev. Horace: Odes and Epodes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Russell, D. A. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, 1981.
Russell, D. A., prev. Quintilian: The Orator’s Education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2001. – Matjaž Babič, prev. Kvintilijan: Šola govorništva. Ljubljana: Šola retorike Zupančič&Zupančič, 2015.
Senegačnik, Brane, prev. Pindar: Slavospevi in izbrani fragmenti. Ljubljana: Družina, 2013.
Snell, Bruno, in Herwig Maehler, izd. Pindari carmina cum fragmentis, zv. 1: Epinicia. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1980. Zv. 2: Fragmenta. Indices. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1975.
Sovrè, Anton, prev. Homer: Iliada. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije, 1965.
Theunissen, Michael. Pindar. Menschenlos und Wende der Zeit. München: C. H. Beck, 2000.
Tomc, Kristina. »Pindarum quisquis studet aemulari: interpretacija Horacijeve pesmi 4.2«. Keria 10.2 (2008): 21–42.
Usher, Stephen, prev. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Critical Essays II. On Literary Composition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich von. Textgeschicte der griechischen Lyriker. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1900.
Williams, Frederick. Callimachus: Hymn to Apollo. A Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
Young, David C. »Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A Study in Ancient Criticism«. Classical Antiquity 2.1 (1983): 156–170.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vid Snoj

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.