Investigating the Semantic Development of Modal Markers: The Role of Context


  • Tomaž Potočnik University College London
  • Matej Hriberšek University of Ljubljana



modality, Latin modality, grammaticalization, deontic, epistemic


The article tackles the problem of studying diachronic semantic changes of modal markers in Latin. It proposes to do so by using context as a proxy for tracing the development of otherwise unchanging forms. In the first part, the main theoretical positions in modality studies are presented, especially the notions of deontic modality, epistemic modality, and pathways of modality. In the second part, Heine’s model for studying the role of context in language change is presented and applied to the modal verb licet. In the case study of licet, an attempt is made to identify the so-called switch context which co-creates the conditions necessary for the semantic change.


Download data is not yet available.


Bolkestein, A. M. “Problems in the Description of Modal Verbs: An Investigation of Latin.” Studies in Greek and Latin Linguistics 1. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1980.

Bybee, Joan. “Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency.” In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 602–23. London: Blackwell, 2003.

Bybee, Joan. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Glare, P.G.W. Oxford Latin Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press / Clarendon Press, 1968.

Haspelmath, Martin. “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics 37.6 (1999): 1043–68.

Haspelmath, Martin. “On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization.” In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, edited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 2004.

Heine, Bernd. “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization.” In New Reflections on Grammaticalization 2, edited by Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.

Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Lyons, John. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

Magni, Elisabetta. “Modality’s Semantic Maps: An Investigation of Some Latin Modal Forms.” In Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the Twelfth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Bologna, 9–14 June 2003); Papers on Grammar 9.1, edited by Gualtiero Calboli, 325–36. Rome: Herder, 2005.

Magni, Elisabetta. “Mood and Modality.” In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 4: Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, edited by Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 193–275. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 2010.

Narrog, Heiko. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

Nuyts, Jan. “The Modal Confusion: On Terminology and the Concepts Behind It.” In Modality: Studies in Form and Function, edited by A. Klinge and H. Hoeg Muller, 5–38. London: Equinox, 2005.

Palmer, Frank. Mood and Modality. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. “Modality’s Semantic Map.” In Linguistic Typology 2 (1998): 79–124.

Wiesthaler, Fran. Latinsko-slovenski slovar. Ljubljana: Kres, 1993–2007.

Ziegeler, Debra. “Redefining Unidirectionality: Is There Life after Modality?” In New Reflections on Grammaticalization 2, edited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003.



20. 12. 2019




How to Cite

“Investigating the Semantic Development of Modal Markers: The Role of Context”. 2019. Clotho 1 (2): 35-53.