Aias Mastigophoros: Divine Ostentation within a Play
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/clotho.1.2.17-33Keywords:
Greek drama, Sophocles, Aias, theatre theory, play-within-a-play, theatricalityAbstract
The paper analyses a short scene that forms part of the opening of Sophocles’ Aias (66–133): Aias, suffering from the madness that was inflicted upon him by Athena, is displayed by the goddess to Odysseus. In the corpus of extant ancient drama, this inset appears to be unique. Its expressive power is derived from the scene’s specific structure that doubles the integral elements of theatre. The paper suggests the reasons why the scene has often been labeled “a play-within-a-play,” describing and illustrating the elements that can be paralleled with the structural components of theatre. Taking as basis concepts and ideas proposed by modern theatre theoreticians (Anne Ubersfeld, Tadeusz Kowzan, Umberto Eco), the paper argues that the essence of the performative dimension of the scene is to be found in the phenomenon of the “ostentation act” first described by Umberto Eco. Tracing the meaning of the inset within the tragedy as a whole, the paper emphasizes the fact that the “ostentation” in Aias is a divine creation, and examines how Odysseus, a privileged recipient of the spectacle, reacts to the display of Aias’ shameful condition.
Downloads
References
Bourgy, Victor. “About the Inset Spectacle in Shakespeare (Stance, Distance, Substance).” In The Show Within: Dramatic and Other Insets; English Renaissance Drama (1550–1642), Astraea 4, ed. by François Laroque, 1–20. Montpellier: Publications de l’Université Paul Valéry, 1992.
Burian, Peter. “Myth into muthos: The Shaping of Tragic Plot.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. by Patricia E. Easterling, 178–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Easterling, Patricia Elizabeth. “Gods on Stage in Greek Tragedy.” In Religio Graeco-Romana: Festschrift für Walter Pötscher, GB, ed. by J. Dalfen et al., suppl. 5 (1993): 77–86.
Eco, Umberto. “Semiotics of Theatrical Performance.” The Drama Review 21 (1977): 107–17.
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986 (first published in 1974).
Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. and transl. Aristophanes: Frogs; Assemblywomen; Wealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Garvie, Alexander F., ed. Sophocles: Ajax. Warminster: Liverpool University Press, 1998.
Jebb, Richard C., ed. and transl. Sophocles: The Plays and Fragments – Part vii; The Ajax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1896.
Kowzan, Tadeusz. Sémiologie du théâtre. Paris: Nathan Université, 1992.
Langer, Susanne K. Feeling and Form. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1953.
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, ed. and transl. Sophocles: Ajax; Electra; Oedipus Tyrannus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Parker, Robert. “Through a Glass Darkly: Sophocles and the Divine.” In Sophocles Revisited: Essays presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. by J. Griffin, 11–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Poe, Joe Park. Genre and Meaning in Sophocles’ Ajax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1987.
Ringer, Mark. Electra and the Empty Urn: Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1998.
Rosenmeyer, T. G. “‘Metatheater’: An Essay on Overload.” Arion 10.2 (2002): 87–119.
Senegačnik, Brane. “Klasična atiška tragedija.” In Ajshil: Pribežnice, 73–134. Celje: Mohorjeva, 2008.
Taplin, Oliver. Greek Tragedy in Action. London: Methuen, 1978.
Ubersfeld, Anne. Reading Theatre. Translated by F. H. Collins. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999 (French original first published in 1977).
Valakas, Kostas. “The use of the body by actors in tragedy and satyr-play.” In Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession, ed. by Patricia Elizabeth Easterling and Edith Hall, 69–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.