Attitudes of the Hungarian-American Diaspora to the Officialization of English in the United States

Sandor Czegledi

doi:10.4312/elope.21.1.45-61

Authors

Sandor Czegledi University of Pannonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.21.1.45-61

Keywords:

Hungarian diaspora, United States, language ideologies, Official English

Abstract

The paper examines the attitudes and opinions of the representatives of Hungarian-American communities in the United States regarding the officialization of English at the federal level. The corpora of the analysis have been built with the help of a) the websites of Hungarian-American organizations in the United States; b) the legislative database of the US Federal Congress; and the digitized versions of the printed newspapers and magazines published in Hungarian in the United States. The method of classifying the attitude patterns relies on Terrence G. Wiley’s language policy classification spectrum (1999) and on Richard Ruíz’s classic “orientations in language planning” framework (1984), expanded by Hult and Hornberger (2016). The results indicate that while Hungarian-Americans have mostly been trying to maintain their first language (in the private domain), they have also embraced English and willingly assimilated into American society, resenting the alleged ethnolinguistic separatism of Hispanic Americans and their demands for special minority-language accommodations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“A kétnyelvűséget ellenzi az új kormány.” 1981. Californiai Magyarság, May 1, 1981, 2. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/CaliforniaiMagyarsag_1981/?query=%22k%C3%A9tnyelv%C5%B1+oktat%C3%A1s%22&pg=169&layout=s.

Arcanum Digitheca. 2023. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/.

“Az új emigránsok átalakítják Amerika társadalmát.” 1986. Chicago és Környéke, July 12, 1986, 3. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/ChicagoEsKornyeke_1986/?query=az%20%C3%BAj%20emigr%C3%A1nsok%20%C3%A1talak%C3%ADtj%C3%A1k&pg=330&layout=s.

Baron, Dennis. 2004. “Spanish, English and the New Nativism.” https://debaron.web.illinois.edu/essays/native.htm.

Bayot, Jennifer. 2004. “Stephen Baker, Ad Executive, Dies at 83.” The New York Times, September 24, 2004. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/24/obituaries/stephen-baker-ad-executive-dies-at-83.html.

Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren. 1998. “The role of language in European nationalist ideologies.” In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, edited by Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard and Paul V. Kroskrity, 189–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borbándi, Gyula. 2006. A magyar emigráció életrajza 1945–1985. Hungarian Electronic Library. https://mek.oszk.hu/03400/03472/html/emigr1.htm#.

Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. “The ‘diaspora’ diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000289997.

Crawford, James. 2000. At War with Diversity: US Language Policy in an Age of Anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Cutshall, Sandy. 2004/2005. “Why We Need ‘The Year of Languages.’” Educational Leadership 62 (4): 20–23. http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/200412/cutshall.html

Czeglédi, Sándor. 2008. Language Policy, Language Politics, and Language Ideology in the United States. Veszprém: Pannonian University Press.

—. 2017. “Promotion, tolerance or repression? The treatment of minority, immigrant and foreign languages in the elementary and secondary education acts.” Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics (HJAL) 12 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2017.1.002.

—. 2018. “The U.S. Federal Congress and the officialization of English: Arguments, ideas and ideologies in federal-level legislative proposals. In Az emberi sors és a történelem kereszteződésében: tanulmánykötet Frank Tibor 70. születésnapjára/At the Crossroads of Human Fate and History: Studies in Honour of Tibor Frank on his 70th birthday, edited by János Kenyeres, Miklós Lojkó, Tamás Magyarics, and Éva Eszter Szabó, 83–101. Budapest: School of English and American Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös Loránd University.

Dabas, Rezső. 1994. “Amerikát okolja a német rendőrállam.” Magyarság, February 11, 1994, 1, 6. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/Magyarsag_1994/?query=%22Amerik%C3%A1t%20okolja%20a%20n%C3%A9met%20rend%C5%91r%C3%A1llam%22&pg=8&layout=s

Devecseri, Tamás. 2007. “Magyar fiúnak nehéz az iskolatáska.” Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, October 12, 2007, 8. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszavaSzabadsag_2007_2/?query=Magyar%20fi%C3%BAnak%20neh%C3%A9z%20az%20iskolat%C3%A1ska&pg=359&layout=s

Dickinson, William L. 1991. “The Language of Government Act.” Congressional Record 137, Part 13, July 18, 1991, House of Representatives, 18829–18881. Retrieved from congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/102/crecb/1991/07/18/GPO-CRECB-1991-pt13-5-1.pdf.

Fenyvesi, Anna. 2005. “Hungarian in the United States.” In Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, edited by Anna Fenyvesi, 265–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.20.16fen.

Gazsó, Dániel. 2020. “Otthon és itthon. A magyar diaszpóra és anyaországa.” PhD diss., Pázmány Péter Catholic University. https://doi.org/10.15774/PPKE.BTK.2020.006

Graedler, Anne-Line. 2014. “Attitudes towards English in Norway: A Corpus-based study of attitudinal expressions in newspaper discourse.” Multilingua 33 (3–4): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0014.

Habsburg, Ottó. 1984. “Egy világnyelv felé?” Chicago és Környéke, June 23, 1984, 3. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/ChicagoEsKornyeke_1984/?query=Egy%20vil%C3%A1gnyelv%20fel%C3%A9%20Habsburg&pg=290&layout=s

Halász, Péter. 1983. “Sauerkraut és társai.” Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, April 15, 1983, 9. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszava_1983_1/?query=Sauerkraut%20Hal%C3%A1sz%20P%C3%A9ter&pg=348&layout=s.

H.R. 123 EH. 1996. “Bill Emerson English Language Empowerment Act of 1996.” 104th Cong., 2nd Sess. https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr123/BILLS-104hr123eh.pdf.

H.R. 997 IH. 2023. “English Language Unity Act of 2023.” 118th Cong., 1st Sess. https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr997/BILLS-118hr997ih.pdf.

H.R. Report 104–723. 1996. “English Language Empowerment Act of 1996.” 104th Cong., 2nd Sess, July 30, 1996. https://www.congress.gov/104/crpt/hrpt723/CRPT-104hrpt723.pdf.

Hult, Francis M., and Nancy H. Hornberger. 2016. “Revisiting Orientations in Language Planning: Problem, Right, and Resource as an Analytical Heuristic.” The Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe 33 (3): 30–49. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/476.

Istook, Ernest. 1996. “English Language Empowerment Act of 1996.” Congressional Record 142, No. 116. August 1, 1996, House of Representatives, H9738-H9772. Retrieved from congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/104/crec/1996/08/01/142/116/CREC-1996-08-01-pt2-PgH9738-4.pdf

Johnson, David Cassels. 2013. Language Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Macías, Reynaldo F. 2000. “Language politics and the sociolinguistic historiography of Spanish in the United States.” In Language in Action: New Studies of Language in Society: Essays in Honor of Roger W. Shuy, edited by Joy Kreeft Peyton, Peg Griffin, Walt Wolfram and Ralph Fasold, 52–83. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

Márer, György. 1981. “Széljegyzetek: Kétnyelvű analfabéták.” Amerikai Magyar Népszava, February 27, 1981, 10. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszava1981_1/?query=%22k%C3%A9tnyelv%C5%B1+oktat%C3%A1s%22&pg=177&layout=s.

Metzger, Nándor. 1974. “Mi az idegen?” Új Világ, September 29, 1974, 3. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/UjVilag_1974/?query=%22Mi%20az%20idegen%3F%22%20Metzger&pg=446&layout=s.

Mikes, György. 1986. “A jenki és a brit.” Szabadság, July 4, 1986, 12. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/Szabadsag_1986_07/?query=%20Magyar%20l%C3%A1bnyomok%201986&pg=11&layout=s

Mikó Kovács, Zoltán. 1983. “Böngészés.” Californiai Magyarság, April 15, 1983, 3. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/CaliforniaiMagyarsag_1983/?query=%20Californiai%20Magyars%C3%A1g%201983.%20%C3%A1prilis%2015.&pg=142&layout=s.

“Milyen fontos egy szavazat?” 1992. Magyarság, May 4, 1992, 3. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/Magyarsag_1992/?query=%22Milyen%20fontos%20egy%20szavazat%3F%22&pg=34&layout=s.

“Minket nem kényeztettek… .” 1982. Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, January 1, 1982, 2. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszava_1982_1/?query=minket%20nem%20k%C3%A9nyeztettek%201982&pg=1&layout=s.

Nádai, Éva. 1995. “Nyelvháború.” Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, September 29, 1995, 2. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszavaSzabadsag_1995/?query=N%C3%A1dai%20%C3%89va%20nyelvh%C3%A1bor%C3%BA&pg=1&layout=s.

Nánay, Endre. 1981. “Világhelyzet.” Californiai Magyarság, January 9, 1981, 1–2. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/CaliforniaiMagyarsag_1981/?query=t%C3%B6meges%20latin%20%C3%B6z%C3%B6nl%C3%A9s&pg=12&layout=s.

—. 1985. “Világhelyzet.” Californiai Magyarság, March 15, 1985, 1–2. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/CaliforniaiMagyarsag_1985/?query=N%C3%A1nay%20Vil%C3%A1ghelyzet%20&pg=108&layout=s.

“Négyszemközt: Bevándorlás és kétnyelvűség.” 1983. Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, December 23, 1983, 10. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszava_1983_2/?query=Ramon%20Santiago%20bev%C3%A1ndorl%C3%A1s&pg=609&layout=s.

“Négyszemközt: Bevándorlás és kétnyelvűség 2.” 1983. Amerikai Magyar Népszava – Szabadság, 1983, December 30, 1983, 10. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/AmerikaiMagyarNepszava_1983_2/?query=bev%C3%A1ndorl%C3%A1s%20%C3%A9s%20k%C3%A9tnyelv%C5%B1s%C3%A9g%20hayakawa&pg=637&layout=s.

ProEnglish. 2023. Official English Map. https://proenglish.org/official-english-map-2/.

Pułaczewska, Hanna. 2015. Student’s First Guide to Language Policy and Planning. Revised ed. Regensburg: Sprachlit.

Roth, Toby. 1994. “Amendment offered by Mr. Roth.” Congressional Record 140, Part 4, 1994, House of Representatives, 5567–5801.

Ruíz, Richard. 1984. “Orientations in language planning.” NABE Journal 8 (2): 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464.

S. 1109 IS. 2023. “English Language Unity Act of 2023,” 118th Cong., 1st Sess.

Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2003. “American identity and attitudes toward official-English policies.” Political Psychology 24 (3): 469–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792322.

—. 2005. Press “ONE” for English: Language Policy, Public Opinion, and American Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Schmidt, Ronald, Sr. 2000. Language Policy and Identity Politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

S.J.Res.72. 1981. “A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with respect to proceedings and documents in the English language,” 97th Cong., 1st Session. https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/72?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22SJRes+72+1981%22%5D%7D&s=4&r=3.

Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. 2009. Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. 2021. Rethinking Language Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ternovszky, Dr. Ferenc. 1983. “Új bevándorlási törvény szükséges!” Új Világ, April 22, 1983, 10. Retrieved from Arcanum Digitheca. https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/UjVilag_1983/?query=%22k%C3%A9tnyelv%C5%B1+oktat%C3%A1s%22&pg=45&layout=s.

The American Hungarian Federation. 2023a. “About the American Hungarian Federation.” https://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/about.htm.

—. 2023b. “Intolerance in Slovakia: The Oppressive, Draconian ‘Language Law.’” https://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/news_slovakia_LanguageLaw.htm.

—. 2023c. “The Hungarian American Education and Cultural Fund/Amerikai Magyar Oktatási és Kulturális Alap (AMOKA).” https://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/news_AMOKA.htm.

United States Census Bureau. 2010a. “Language Spoken at Home: Hungarian.” ACS 1-Year Estimates Public Use Microdata Sample, 2010 (LANP) [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/mdat/#/search?ds=ACSPUMS1Y2010&rv=LANP%28682%29&wt=PWGTP.

—. 2010b. “Selected Population Profile in the United States.” ACS 1-year estimates, 2010 (S0201) [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/table?q=Hungarian&t=Language+Spoken+at+Home&tid=ACSSPP1Y2010.S0201.

—. 2021a. “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Language Use.” December 16, 2021. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/language-use/about/faqs.html

—. 2021b. “Historical Language Questions.” December 3, 2021. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/language-use/about/historical.html

—. 2021c. “Language Spoken at Home: Hungarian.” ACS 1-Year Estimates Public Use Microdata Sample, 2021 (LANP). [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/mdat/#/search?ds=ACSPUMS1Y2021&rv=LANP%281582%29&wt=PWGTP

—. 2021d. “Selected Population Profile in the United States.” ACS 1-year estimates, 2021 (S0201). [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/table?q=Hungarian&t=Language+Spoken+at+Home&tid=ACSSPP1Y2021.S0201

—. 2022. “About the American Community Survey.” June 2, 2022. https://www.census.gov/programssurveys/acs/about.html.

—. 2023. “The Importance of the American Community Survey and the Decennial Census.” https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/about/acs-and-census.html.

US English. 2022. “About U.S. English. U.S. English Advisory Board.” https://www.usenglish.org/advisory-board/.

Wikipedia. 2023. “Amerikai Magyar Népszava.” Last modified December 18, 2021. https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerikai_Magyar_N%C3%A9pszava

Wiley, Terrence G. 1999. “Comparative historical analysis of U.S. language policy and language planning: Extending the foundations." In Sociopolitical Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning in the USA, edited by Thom Huebner, Kathryn A. Davis and Joseph LoBianco, 17–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

—. 2000. “Continuity and change in the function of language ideologies in the United States.” In Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English, edited by Thomas Ricento, 67–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Wiley, Terrence G., and Haley de Korne. 2014. “Historical orientations to language policy in the United States.” Language Policy Research Network Brief (March 2014): 1–4. http://www.cal.org/lpren/pdfs/briefs/historical-orientations-to-language-policy-in-the-united-states.pdf.

Woolard, Kathryn A. 1992. “Language ideology: Issues and approaches.” Pragmatics 2 (3): 235–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.01woo.

Zhou, Minglang. 2015. “Using census data and demography in policy analysis.” In Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide, edited by Francis M. Hult, and David C. Johnson, 205–16. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.