On Non-Native Listeners’ Ability to Identify Prominence and Pitch Accents in English Monologic Speech

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.21.1.63-88

Keywords:

word prominence, pitch accents, L1 prosodic interference, perceptual analysis

Abstract

A comparative perceptual study involving two experimental groups with different native languages (Russian and Czech) shows that phonologically trained non-native speakers of English are good at identifying basic suprasegmental features of the English language, namely prominence (sentence stress) and accent types, which potentially makes it possible to use their prosodic annotations when validating cross-language intonation research. The occasional failure of both experimental groups to identify certain accent types is explained in the study by the annotators’ mother tongue’s prosodic interference: Czech and Russian speakers rely on different acoustic cues when identifying prosodic features in their native languages and transfer this habit to the discrimination of English prosodic characteristics. The study demonstrates that when a prosodic cue is not marked in the speaker’s mother tongue, it will likely be ignored in the foreign language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barry, William, and Bistra Andreeva. 2001. “Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 (1): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001050.

Bishop, Jason, Grace Kuo, and Boram Kim. 2020. “Phonology, phonetics, and signal-extrinsic factors in the perception of prosodic prominence: Evidence from rapid prosody transcription.” Journal of Phonetics 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100977.

Brazil, David, Michael Coulthard, and Christopher Johns. 1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Brown, Adam. 2014. Pronunciation and Phonetics: A Practical Guide for English Language Teachers. London: Routledge.

Cangemi, Francesco, and Mary E. Grice. 2016. “The importance of a distributional approach to categoriality in autosegmental metrical accounts of intonation.” Laboratory Phonology 7 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.28.

Chamonikolasová, Jana. 2007. Intonation in English and Czech Dialogues. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.

Cho, Taehong, and Patricia Keating. 2009. “Effects of initial position versus prominence in English.” Journal of Phonetics 37: 466–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.001.

Cicchetti, Dante. 1994. “Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.” Psychological Assessment 6: 284–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.

Cole, Jennifer, Timothy Mahrt, and Joseph Roy. 2017. “Crowd-sourcing prosodic annotation.” Computer Speech & Language 45: 300–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.02.008.

Cole, Jennifer, Yoonsook Mo, and Mark Hasegawa-Johnson. 2010. “Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence.” Laboratory Phonology 1: 425–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.022.

Cole, Jennifer, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2016. “New methods for prosodic transcription: Capturing variability as a source of information.” Laboratory Phonology 7 (1): [8]. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.29.

Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge.

Eckman, Fred. 1977. “Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis.” Language Learning 27 (2): 315–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x.

Firbas, Jan. 1996. “Mobility of clause constituents and functional sentence perspective.” In Discourse and Meaning: Papers in Honour of Eva Hajičová, edited by Barbara H. Partee and Petr Sgall, 221–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fougeron, Cécile, and Patricia Keating. 1997. “Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (6): 3728–40. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418332.

González-Ferreras, Clara, Carmen Vivaracho-Pascual, Daniel Escudero-Mancebo, and Victoria Cardeñoso-Payo. 2010. “On the automatic ToBI accent type identification from data.” Interspeech 2010: 142–45. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-70.

Grabe, Esther, Francis Nolan, and Kari Farrar. 2000. “Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English.” Journal of Phonetics 28 (2): 161–85. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0111.

Halliday, M. A. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.

Herman, Robert. 2000. “Phonetic markers of global discourse structures in English.” Journal of Phonetics 28: 466–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0127.

Hirschberg, Julia, and Mary Beckman. 1994. “The ToBI annotation conventions.” Retrieved from http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/files/conv.pdf.

Leed, Robert L. 1965. “A contrastive analysis of Russian and English intonation contours.” The Slavic and East European Journal 9 (1): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/304390.

Levis, John M., and Alif O. Silpachai. 2017. “Prominence and information structure in pronunciation teaching materials.” Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Proceedings 9 (1): 216–29.

Luchkina, Tatiana, and Jennifer Cole. 2021. “Perception of word-level prominence in free word order language discourse.” Language and Speech 64 (2): 381–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919884089.

Luchkina, Tatiana, Varun Puri, Pavithra Jyothi, and Jennifer Cole. 2015. “Prosodic and structural correlates of perceived prominence in Russian and Hindi.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/1603/files/2017/01/Luchkina-Jyothi-Sharma-Cole_ICPHS_2015-2n15ibp.pdf.

Mat Daud, Nuraihan, Noor Lide Abu Kassim, and Nor Shidrah Mat Daud. 2011. “Students as assessors.” In Language Studies in the Muslim World, 1–18. IIUM Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2804.4162.

McAndrews, Maura. 2019. “Short periods of instruction improve learners’ phonological categories for L2 suprasegmental features.” System 82: 151–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.007.

McHugh, Mary Louise. 2012. “Interrater reliability: The Kappa statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–82.

O’Connor, Joseph, and Gimson Arnold. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. Bristol: Longman.

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. “The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation.” Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Potapova, Raisa, and Vsevolod Potapov. 2006. Jazyk, Rech, Lichnost. Moscow: Jazyki Slavianskoy Kultury.

Riazantseva, A. 2001. “Second language proficiency and pausing. A study of Russian speakers of English.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23 (4): 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310100403X.

Rietveld, Toni, and Alan Chen. 2006. “How to obtain and process perceptual judgments of intonational meaning.” In Methods in Empirical Prosody Research, edited by Stefan Sudhoff, Denisa Lenertova, Roland Meyer, Sandra Pappert, Petra Augurzky, Ina Mleinek, Nicole Richter and Johannes Schließer, 283–319. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914641.

Sanderman, Ann, and Robert Collier. 1997. “Prosodic phrasing and comprehension.” Language and Speech 40 (4): 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000405.

Skarnitzl, Radek, and Anders Eriksson. 2017. “The acoustics of word stress in Czech as a function of speaking style.” Interspeech 2017: 3221–25. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-417.

Skarnitzl, Radek, and Hana Hledíková. 2022. “Prosodic phrasing of good speakers in English and Czech.” Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857647.

Snow, Rion, Brendan O’Connor, Dan Jurafsky, and Andrew Ng. 2008. “Cheap and fast – but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks.” In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, edited by Mirella Lapata and Hwee Tou Ng, 254–63. Honolulu: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Tench, Paul. 2011. Transcribing the Sound of English: A Phonetics Workbook for Words and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toivanen, Juhani. 2005. “ToBI or not ToBI? Testing two models in teaching English intonation to Finns.” In Proceedings of Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, 2005. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4f7274b4fab041bde8d81f2307b93418737e9ddb.

Trofimovich, Pavel, and William Baker. 2006. “Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013.

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 2005. “Perception of intonation.” In The Handbook of Speech Perception, edited by David Pisoni and Robert Remez, 236–63. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Van Heuven, Vincent J. 2018. “Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues of word and sentence stress.” In The Study of Word Stress and Accent: Theories, Methods, and Data, edited by René Goedemans, John Heinz, and Harry van der Hulst, 15–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verma, Vishesh, and Ritu K. Aggarwal. 2020. “A comparative analysis of similarity measures akin to the Jaccard index in collaborative recommendations: An empirical and theoretical perspective.” Social Network Analysis and Mining 10: 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00660-9.

Volín, Jan, and Radek Skarnitzl. 2007. “Temporal downtrends in Czech read speech.” Interspeech 2007: 442–45. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2007-214.

Weingartová, Lucie, Katarína Poesová, and Jan Volín. 2014. “Prominence contrasts in Czech English as a predictor of learner’s proficiency.” Speech Prosody 7: 236–40. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014 -35.

Wells, John Christopher. 2006. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

22. 08. 2024

How to Cite

Tymbay, A. (2024). On Non-Native Listeners’ Ability to Identify Prominence and Pitch Accents in English Monologic Speech. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 21(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.21.1.63-88