Authorship Attribution and the Material Realities of Early Modern Play Texts

Andrej Zavrl

doi:10.4312/elope.21.1.229-245

Authors

Andrej Zavrl

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.21.1.229-245

Keywords:

authorship, Christopher Marlowe, William Shakespeare, textual transmission, material texts, stylometry, GIGO

Abstract

The digitization of texts and the advent of big data analyses have transformed our understanding of authorship and collaboration in early modern drama. However, these advancements ought to be carefully contextualized within the material realities of early modern playwriting. The scarcity of surviving dramatic manuscripts underscores the significant role of agents like compositors, printers and editors, and the loss of the majority of plays from English commercial theatres casts doubt on the reliability of comparisons based on unique or common verbal parallels. The article focuses on drama from the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods, particularly the recently proposed collaboration between Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare on the Henry VI plays. Applying the IT concept of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out), it highlights the impact of textual transmission intricacies on authorship attribution, emphasizing that even the most sophisticated attribution techniques are only as reliable as the (often unreliable) data they utilize.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auerbach, David Benjamin. 2019. “Statistical infelicities in The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 33 (1): 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769X.2018.1559023.

Babbage, Charles. 1864. Passages from the Life of a Philosopher. London: Longman.

Barber, Ros. 2021. “Big data or not enough? Zeta test reliability and the attribution of Henry VI.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36 (3): 542–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa041.

Berger, Thomas L. 2007. “Shakespeare writ small: Early single editions of Shakespeare’s plays.” In A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, edited by Andrew Murphy, 57–70. Malden: Blackwell.

Boguszak, Jakub. 2017. “‘Scarlet Experiment!’”: The New Oxford Shakespeare and the Importance of Authorship.” Shakespeare 13 (4): 309–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406394.

Bruster, Douglas. 2023. Seeing Shakespeare’s Style. New York: Routledge.

Burns, Edward. 2000. “Introduction.” In King Henry VI: Part 1 by William Shakespeare, edited by Edward Burns, 1–103. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Burrows, John, and Hugh Craig. 2017. “The Joker in the pack? Marlowe, Kyd, and the co-authorship of Henry VI, Part 3.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 194–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chernaik, Warren. 2014. “Shakespeare as co-author: The case of 1 Henry VI.” Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England 27: 192–220. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24322642.

Cox, John D., and Eric Rasmussen. 2020. “Introduction.” In King Henry VI: Part 3 by William Shakespeare, edited by John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen, 1–176. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Craig, Hugh. 2021. “Shakespeare and authorship attribution methodologies.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Lukas Erne, 225–43. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Craig, Hugh, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch. 2017. Style, Computers, and Early Modern Drama: Beyond Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Egan, Gabriel. 2014. “What is not collaborative about early modern drama in performance and print?” Shakespeare Survey 67 (2014): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/SSO9781107775572.002.

—. 2017. “A history of Shakespearean authorship attribution.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elliott, Jack, and Brett Greatley-Hirsch. 2017. “Arden of Faversham, Shakespearean authorship, and ‘The Print of Many’.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 139–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Erne, Lukas. 2013. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evert, Stefan, Thomas Proisl, Fotis Jannidis, Isabella Reger, Steffen Pielström, Christof Schöch, and Thorsten Vitt. 2017. “Understanding and explaining delta measures for authorship attribution.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32, suppl. 2: ii4–ii16. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx023.

Freebury-Jones, Darren. 2016. “Exploring co-authorship in 2 Henry VI.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 5 (March): 201–16. https://doi.org/10.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-18089.

—. 2017. “Did Shakespeare really co-write 2 Henry VI with Marlowe?” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 30 (3): 137–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769X.2017.1295360.

—. 2019. “‘When a man hath a familiar style’: An introduction to authorship studies in early modern drama and literature.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 33 (2–3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769X.2019.1677210.

—. 2021. “Introduction: Computational approaches to examining early modern texts.” Early Modern Digital Review 4 (4): 191–95. https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v44i4.38645.

—. 2022. Shakespeare’s Tutor: The Influence of Thomas Kyd. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Giddens, Eugene. 2011. How to Read a Shakespearean Play Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gossett, Suzanne. 2022. Shakespeare and Textual Theory. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Greatley-Hirsch, Brett. 2021. “Computational studies.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Contemporary Shakespeare Criticism, edited by Evelyn Gajowski, 205–21. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Greenblatt, Stephen. 1997. “General introduction.” In The Norton Shakespeare, edited by Stephen Greenblatt, 1–76. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Hadfield, Andrew. 2021. “Marlowe and Nashe.” English Literary Renaissance 51 (2): 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/713483.

Hirschfeld, Heather. 2015. “Playwriting in Shakespeare’s time: Authorship, collaboration, and attribution.” In Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Margaret Jane Kidnie and Sonia Massai, 13–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hooks, Adam G. 2016. “The author being dead.” In Shakespeare in Our Time: A Shakespeare Association of America Collection, edited by Dympna Callaghan and Suzanne Gossett, 153–57. London and New York: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.

Hopkins, Lisa. 2005. A Christopher Marlowe Chronology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jackson, MacDonald P. 2017. “Shakespeare, Arden of Faversham, and A Lover’s Complaint: A review of reviews.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 123–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jowett, John. 2007. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 2021. “The early printed texts of Shakespeare.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Lukas Erne, 71–93. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Knowles, Ronald. 2001. “Introduction.” In King Henry VI: Part 2 by William Shakespeare, edited by Ronald Knowles, 1–141. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Love, Harold. 2002. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McInnis, David. 2015. “Marlowe and electronic resources.” In Christopher Marlowe at 450, edited by Sara Munson Deats and Robert A. Logan, 309–26. Farnham: Ashgate.

McInnis, David, and Matthew Steggle. 2014. “Introduction: Nothing will come of nothing? Or, what can we learn from plays that don’t exist?” In Lost Plays in Shakespeare’s England, edited by David McInnis and Matthew Steggle, 1–14. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

—. 2020. “Introduction.” In Tamburlaine: A Critical Reader, edited by David McInnis, 1–18. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

—. 2021. Shakespeare and Lost Plays: Reimagining Drama in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Murphy, Andrew. 2007. “Introduction: What happens in Hamlet?” In A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, edited by Andrew Murphy, 1–14. Malden: Blackwell.

Rudman, Joseph. 2016. “Non-traditional authorship attribution studies of William Shakespeare’s canon: Some caveats.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 5 (March): 307–28. https://doi.org/10.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-18094.

—. 2019. “The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion.” In Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (3): 703–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz044.

Sanders, Norman. 1990. “Shakespeare’s Text.” In Shakespeare: A Bibliographical Guide, New Edition, edited by Stanley Wells, 17–35. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schoenbaum, Samuel. 1966. Internal Evidence and Elizabethan Dramatic Authorship: An Essay in Literary History and Method. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Sharpe, Will. 2014. “Framing Shakespeare’s collaborative authorship.” Shakespeare Survey 67: 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/SSO9781107775572.003.

Shrank, Cathy L., and Paul Werstine. 2021. “The Shakespeare manuscripts.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Lukas Erne, 53–70. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Smith, Emma. 2021. “Shakespeare’s early modern books: Printing, paratext and text.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Textual Studies, edited by Lukas Erne, 94–110. London: The Arden Shakespeare.

Stallybrass, Peter, and Roger Chartier. 2007. “Reading and authorship: The circulation of Shakespeare 1590–1619.” In A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text, edited by Andrew Murphy, 35–56. Malden: Blackwell.

Stern, Tiffany. 2004. Making Shakespeare: The Pressures of Stage and Page. London: Routledge.

—. 2009. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Gary. 1987a. “General introduction.” In The Oxford Shakespeare: A Textual Companion, edited by Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, and William Montgomery, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 1987b. “The canon and chronology of Shakespeare’s plays.” In The Oxford Shakespeare: A Textual Companion, edited by Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, and William Montgomery, 69–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 2016. “Collaboration 2016.” In Shakespeare in Our Time: A Shakespeare Association of America Collection, edited by Dympna Callaghan and Suzanne Gossett, 141–49. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.

—. 2017. “Artiginality: Authorship after postmodernism.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 3–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, Gary, John Jowett, Terri Bourus, and Gabriel Egan. 2017. “General editors’ preface: A complete works.” In New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Tayler and Gabriel Egan, v–vi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, Gary, and Rory Loughnane. 2017. “The canon and chronology of Shakespeare’s works.” In The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan, 417–602. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

“The first page of Shakespeare’s Henry the Sixth, Part I. [1623].” 2015. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First-page-first-folio-1henry6.jpg.

“Title page of the first quarto of Henry VI [1594].” 2011. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Henry_VI_pt_2_quarto.jpg.

“Title page of the play now known as Henry VI, Part 3 [1595].” 2011. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3H6_O_TP_1595.jpg.

Vickers, Brian. 2008. “Thomas Kyd, secret sharer.” Times Literary Supplement, April 13, 2008, 13–15.

Williams, William Proctor. 2018. “Gary Taylor and Gabriel Egan (eds), The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion.” Notes and Queries 65 (1): 131–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjx234.