Misconceptions about Article Use in English

Authors

  • Frančiška Lipovšek University of Ljubljana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.3.1-2.99-113

Keywords:

article use, (in)definiteness, reference, identification, restrictive function, identifying function, old and new information

Abstract

The paper addresses some major misconceptions about article use in English, proceeding from purely syntactic issues to those relating directly to pragmatics. It is based on authentic, perfectly acceptable examples of article use that many Slovenian students of English would describe as ‘odd’ or ‘not in accordance with the rules’. The students’ explanations as to why the examples in question should be ruled out confirm the hypothesis that misconceptions about article use are largely ascribable to an insufficient understanding of grammatical rules. The rules governing article use are often misunderstood due to inaccurate interpretations of the terms defining/restrictive, definite, identifying, specifying, classifying, etc. The commonest mistake is equating defining with definite, and defining/restrictive with identifying, the consequence being the overuse of the definite article. Another important point made in the paper is that article use is a matter of pragmatics. The choice between the definite and indefinite articles reflects the speaker’s decision to present a piece of information as hearer-old or hearer-new respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

20.06.2006

How to Cite

Lipovšek, F. (2006). Misconceptions about Article Use in English. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 3(1-2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.3.1-2.99-113