Elimination of Gender Equality in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale


  • Beatrix Kiss University of Debrecen




gender equality, division of labour, gender segregation, oppression, patriarchy, the body, women's rights, Margaret Atwood


This paper explores the elimination of equality in The Handmaid’s Tale in four areas, called the “4Ds”: distinction, dependence, division and dominance. Distinction is a biological point of view in which the Handmaids’ fertility becomes the foundation of their victimization. Dependence analyzes turning fertility into their obligation, integrating Foucault’s “socialization of procreative behavior,” leading to dependence on men. Division entails the physical division of Gilead into subgroups – Handmaids, Wives, etc. – along with the mental division created by distrust among people, harnessed to forestall rebellion. The last area, Dominance, connects the previous areas. Judith Butler’s idea that “the body is a variable boundary,” shows that the political power over the Handmaids’ bodies equals dominance over society and the future, too. The article ends with the conclusion that destruction of women’s rights eventually erases the notion of “woman.”


Download data is not yet available.


Atwood, Margaret. (1985) 2017. The Handmaid’s Tale. London: Vintage.

—. 2019. The Testaments. London: Chatto & Windus.

Barker, Chris. 2002. “Identity, Equality and Difference: The Politics of Gender.” In Making Sense of Cultural Studies: Central Problems and Critical Debates, 108–28. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

Domanovszky, Endre. 1979. Korok ruhái. Budapest: Corvina.

Firestone, Shulamith. 1979. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (first pub. 1970). London: The Women’s Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1979. The History of Sexuality – Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by R. Hurley. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane.

Goldblatt, Patricia F. 1999. “Reconstructing Margaret Atwood’s Protagonists.” World Literature Today 73 (2): 275–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/40154691.

Hartmann, Heidi. 1979. “Capitalism, Patriarchy and Job Segregation by Sex.” In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, edited by Zillah Einstein, 206–47. London: Monthly Press.

Hooker, Deborah. 2006. “(Fl)Orality, Gender, and the Environmental Ethos of Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Twentieth-Century Literature 52 (3): 275–305.

Koenig, Anne M. 2018. “Comparing Prescriptive and Descriptive Gender Stereotypes About Children, Adults, and the Elderly.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086.

Lister, Ruth. 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan.

Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity.

Pilcher, Jane, and Imelda Whelehan. 2004. Fifty Key Concepts in Gender Studies. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

Ruddick, Sara. 1997. “Maternal Thinking.” In Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, edited by Diana T. Meyers, 583–603. New York: Routledge.

Sayers, Janet. 1982. Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives. London: Tavistock.

Tong, Rosemarie. 1988. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorising Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Whitford, Margaret. 1991. The Irigaray Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.




How to Cite

Kiss, B. (2020). Elimination of Gender Equality in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 17(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.57-66