Elimination of Gender Equality in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.57-66Keywords:
gender equality, division of labour, gender segregation, oppression, patriarchy, the body, women's rights, Margaret AtwoodAbstract
This paper explores the elimination of equality in The Handmaid’s Tale in four areas, called the “4Ds”: distinction, dependence, division and dominance. Distinction is a biological point of view in which the Handmaids’ fertility becomes the foundation of their victimization. Dependence analyzes turning fertility into their obligation, integrating Foucault’s “socialization of procreative behavior,” leading to dependence on men. Division entails the physical division of Gilead into subgroups – Handmaids, Wives, etc. – along with the mental division created by distrust among people, harnessed to forestall rebellion. The last area, Dominance, connects the previous areas. Judith Butler’s idea that “the body is a variable boundary,” shows that the political power over the Handmaids’ bodies equals dominance over society and the future, too. The article ends with the conclusion that destruction of women’s rights eventually erases the notion of “woman.”
Downloads
References
Atwood, Margaret. (1985) 2017. The Handmaid’s Tale. London: Vintage.
—. 2019. The Testaments. London: Chatto & Windus.
Barker, Chris. 2002. “Identity, Equality and Difference: The Politics of Gender.” In Making Sense of Cultural Studies: Central Problems and Critical Debates, 108–28. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Domanovszky, Endre. 1979. Korok ruhái. Budapest: Corvina.
Firestone, Shulamith. 1979. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (first pub. 1970). London: The Women’s Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. The History of Sexuality – Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by R. Hurley. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane.
Goldblatt, Patricia F. 1999. “Reconstructing Margaret Atwood’s Protagonists.” World Literature Today 73 (2): 275–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/40154691.
Hartmann, Heidi. 1979. “Capitalism, Patriarchy and Job Segregation by Sex.” In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, edited by Zillah Einstein, 206–47. London: Monthly Press.
Hooker, Deborah. 2006. “(Fl)Orality, Gender, and the Environmental Ethos of Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Twentieth-Century Literature 52 (3): 275–305.
Koenig, Anne M. 2018. “Comparing Prescriptive and Descriptive Gender Stereotypes About Children, Adults, and the Elderly.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086.
Lister, Ruth. 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan.
Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity.
Pilcher, Jane, and Imelda Whelehan. 2004. Fifty Key Concepts in Gender Studies. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
Ruddick, Sara. 1997. “Maternal Thinking.” In Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, edited by Diana T. Meyers, 583–603. New York: Routledge.
Sayers, Janet. 1982. Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives. London: Tavistock.
Tong, Rosemarie. 1988. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorising Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Whitford, Margaret. 1991. The Irigaray Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Beatrix Kiss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal ELOPE by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
