Mythologising the Pythia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/keria.12.1.23-42Keywords:
ancient Greece, prophecy, Delphi, Pythia, mythologisingAbstract
Disappointed with the results of the French excavations at Delphi in the late 19th century, many researchers declared that Apollo and Pythia had never said anything. They expressed doubts about Pythia’s exceptional function and denied that her prophetic ability was natural, proclaiming her a fictitious or literary character, invented by philosophers in order to explain prophetic ability. Some went as far as to renounce the ancient sources as uncritical myths, and to label the Pythias as a product of religious manipulation and philosophical mystification. Despite the vast evidence in the primary sources, they mostly failed to understand how Pythia, presumably a completely ignorant local woman, could have uttered versified oracles, full of ambiguity, about the most important questions including politics, reforms, colonisation, war and peace, public health etc.The paper discusses how Plutarch’s Pythian dialogues (The Oracles at Delphi, The Obsolescence of Oracles, The E at Delphi) present a valuable source for the revision of some still generally accepted notions about Delphi and Pythia. The possibilities of a contemporary re-contextualisation of Apollo’s priestess are examined in view of some recent approaches, based on anthropology and gender studies. Besides trying to examine the Pythias’ enthusiasm, as described by Plutarch, from the native perspective of antiquity as well as of gender studies, the paper argues for a re-examination of some widely accepted yet highly questionable notions concerning virginity, the sexualisation of the prophetic seance, and the renowned ambiguity of oracles as a sign of prophetic language rather than institutional duplicity.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
24.07.2010
Issue
Section
Scholarly Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in Keria by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.