Experiences of university students and their professor with peer teaching: Feedback
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.30.3.98-111Keywords:
pedagogical model, reciprocal style, physical education, sport, qualitative methodologyAbstract
Background: Reciprocal style or reciprocal peer teaching is based on peer-assisted learning and promotes learning with the help of peers and positive interdependence. Learners are paired and swap the roles of doer (i.e. tutee) and helper (i.e. tutor) to maximise each other’s learning. Reciprocal peer teaching has been shown to be an effective instructional model for use in schools. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate university students’ and professor’s experiences of reciprocal peer teaching in athletics, focusing on observation, cooperative skills, and transitions. We were interested in whether prospective teachers and trainers would use this pedagogical model in the future. Methods: 36 university students participated in 45 45-minute lessons in athletics using reciprocal peer teaching. Semi-structured group interviews with randomly selected students took place twice for each study group. During the study, the professor-as-researcher wrote a reflective analysis after each lesson. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and constant comparison. Results: Three themes were identified that described the students’ and professor’s attitudes towards reciprocal peer teaching: (a) ‘Knowledge and observation’, (b) ‘Interpersonal and small-group skills’, and (c) ‘Usefulness and transition’. Discussion and Conclusions: According to the results, we believe that modern teaching approaches should have a place in pedagogically orientated university courses. For future research, we suggest investigating primary and secondary students’ experiences with peer teaching in Physical Education.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Arripe-longueville, F., Fleurance, P., & Winnykamen, F. (1995). Effects of the degree of competence symmetry-asymmetry in the acquisition of a motor skill in a dyad. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 28, 255–273.
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup I., & Sandford R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27.
Casey, A., Dyson, B., & Campbell, A. (2009). Action research in physical education: Focusing beyond myself through cooperative learning. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 407–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093508
Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest, 67(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2014.984733
Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Dyson, B. (2015). Model fidelity and students’ responses to an authenticated unit of cooperative learning. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(4), 642–660. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0227
Dyson, B. (2002). The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.22.1.69
Ensergueix, P., & Lafont, L. (2011). Impact of trained versus spontaneous reciprocal peer tutoring on adolescent students. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 381–397.
Fernández-Rio, J., & Iglesias, D. (2024). What do we know about pedagogical models in physical education so far? An umbrella review. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2039615
Garví-Medrano, P. M., García-López, L. M., & Fernández-Río, J. (2023). Cooperative learning, basic psychological needs and intention to be physically active. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Fisica y del Deporte, 23(89), 243–260. https://doi.org/ 10.15366/rimcafd2022.89.017
Grineski, S. (1996). Cooperative learning in physical education. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. (2013). Aligning learning activities with instructional models. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07303084.2013.767719
Iserbyt, P. & Byra, M. (2013). Task cards: Design and use in the reciprocal style of teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(2), 20–26.
Iserbyt, P., Elen, J., & Behets, D. (2009). Peer evaluation in reciprocal learning with task cards for acquiring basic life support (BLS). Resuscitation, 80(12), 1394–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2009.07.006
Jank, W. in Meyer, H. (2006). Didaktični modeli [Didactical models]. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo.
Jenkinson, K. A., Naughton, G., & Benson, A. C. (2014). Peer-assisted learning in school physical education, Sport and physical activity programmes: A systematic review. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 19(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754004
Jeriček, H. (2004). Posledice konstruktivizma pri delu z ljudmi [Consequences of constructivism in working with people]. In B. Marentič Požarnik (Ed.), Konstruktivizem v šoli in izobraževanje učiteljev [Constructivism in schools and teacher education] (pp. 97–113). Ljubljana: Center za pedagoško izobraževanje Filozofske fakultete.
Lafont, L. (2012). Cooperative learning and tutoring in sports and physical activities. In B. Dyson & A. Casey (Eds.), Cooperative learning in physical education: A researchbased approach (pp. 136–149). UK: Routledge Studies in Physical Education and Youth Sport.
Lafont, L., Rivière, C., Darnis, F., & Legrain, P. (2016). How to structure group work? Conditions of efficacy and methodological considerations in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15626639
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Madou, T., Depaepe, F., Ward, P., & Iserbyt, P. (2023). The effect of specialized content knowledge in reciprocal peer learning in a university content class. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2256746
Madou, T., & Iserbyt, P. (2018). The effect of pairing by ability on performance, physical activity, and time-on-task during reciprocal peer teaching in swimming. The Physical Educator, 75(5):756–773. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2018-V75-I5-8326
Metzler, M. W. (2011). Instructional models for physical education. New York: Routledge.
Metzler, M. W., & Colquitt, G. T. (2021). Instructional models for physical education (4th Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Miletic, D., Miletic, A., & Uzunovic, S. (2023). The effects of reciprocal, self–check, and command teaching styles on dance learning. Physical Education of Students, 27(5), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0506
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching Physical Education. Online Edition.
Navarro-Patón, R., Rodríguez-Fernández, J. E., & Pereira, B. O. (2019). Cooperative games vs competitive games in primary school education: What effects do they have on schoolchildren motivation? Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 14, 1–4.
Nawawi, U., Alnedral, Ihsan, N., Tri Mario, D., & Mardesia, P. (2023). The effect of learning methods and motor skills on the learning outcomes of basic techniques in volleyball. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(9), 2453–2460. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.09282
Novak, B. (2004). Odnos med učenjem in poukom v osnovni šoli z vidika transformacijske paradigme [Relationship between learning and instruction in primary school from the perspective of transformational paradigm]. In B. Marentič Požarnik (Ed.), Konstruktivizem v šoli in izobraževanje učiteljev [Constructivism in schools and teacher education] (pp. 181–194). Center za pedagoško izobraževanje Filozofske fakultete.
Pitsi, A., Digelidis, N., & Papaioannou, A. (2015). The effects of reciprocal and self–check teaching styles in students’ intrinsic– extrinsic motivation, enjoyment and autonomy in teaching traditional Greek dances. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.02053
Polvi, S., & Telama, R. (2000). The use of cooperative learning as a social enhancer in physical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696660
Salih, M. M. M., Hashim, R. S., & Kasim, M. A. (2021). Forecasting achievement sports through cooperative learning in handball training in physical education. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 9(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29252/aassjournal.953.
Silva, R., Farias, C., & Mesqita, I. (2021). Cooperative learning contribution to student social learning and active role in the class. Sustainability, 13, 8644. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13158644.
Ward, P., & Lee, M.-A. (2005). Peer-assisted learning in physical education: A review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 205 – 225. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.24.3.205
Yang, C., Chen, R., Chen, X., & Lu, K.-H. (2021). The efficiency of cooperative learning in physical education on the learning of action skills and learning motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717528
Železnik Mežan, L. (2024). Učinki sodelovalnega učenja na gibalna in psihosocialna vedenja mladih atletov [Doctoral thesis, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport]. https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=182100&lang=slv
Železnik Mežan, L., & Cecić Erpič, S. (in press). Children and Coaches in Athletics Experiencing Cooperative Learning for the First Time: A Qualitative Study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.
Železnik Mežan, L., & Škof, B. (2023). Cooperative learning vs. Direct instruction in youth sport: Effects on children’s motor learning. Kinesiologia Slovenica, 29(2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.29.2.136-156
Železnik Mežan, L., Škof, B., Leskošek, B., & Cecić Erpič, S. (2023). Effects of cooperative learning in youth athletics’ motivational climate, peer relationships and self-concept. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2232814
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lea Železnik Mežan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.