Vloge knjižnic v odprti znanosti
Mednarodni vidiki in primeri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.68.2-3.4Ključne besede:
odprta znanost, odprto gibanje, knjižnice, pregledPovzetek
Namen: Pregled pomena odprte znanosti za knjižnice v kontekstu širšega odprtega gibanja z mednarodnimi vidiki in primeri iz nacionalnih, visokošolskih in splošnih knjižnic.
Metodologija/pristop: Predstavljena je kvalitativna sinteza najnovejše literature in spletnih virov.
Rezultati: Posebna pozornost je namenjena potrebi po odprtih knjižničnih infrastrukturah, podpori občanski znanosti, komuniciranju odprte znanosti in knjižnicam kot demonstratorkam odprtih tehnologij. Avtorji predlagajo, da so knjižnice v dobrem položaju za podporo in spodbujanje gibanja za odprto znanost, vendar je treba upoštevati praktična vprašanja politik in virov ter filozofske vidike odprtosti.
Omejitve raziskave: Pregled literature je selektiven namesto izčrpen, večina gradiva pa prihaja iz Evrope in Severne Amerike.
Izvirnost/uporabnost raziskave: Pregled je namenjen v podporo knjižničarjem pri realističnih razmislekih o priložnostih, ki jih ponuja gibanje za odprto znanost.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ackerman, R. (2023, August 17). The future of open source is still very much in flux. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/08/17/1077498/future-open-source
Alotaibi, F. A. A., Johnson, F., and Rowley, J. (2021). Google Scholar or university digital libraries: A comparison of student perceptions and intention to use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 889–1168. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09610006221111197
Ames, S., and Havens, L. (2022). Exploring National Library of Scotland datasets with Jupyter Notebooks. IFLA Journal, 48(1), 50–56. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03400352211065484
Arthur, P. L., Hearn, L. Ryan, J. C., Menon, N., and Khumalo, L. (2023). Making open scholarship more equitable and inclusive. Publications, 11, 41. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/41
Ball, J., Stone, G., and Thompson, S. (2021). Opening up the library: Transforming our policies, practices and structures. Liber Quarterly, 31(1), 1–16. https://liberquarterly.eu/article/view/10882
Ballantyne, N., and Dunning, D. (2022, January 3). Skeptics say “Do your own research”. It’s not that simple. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html
BBC. (n.d.). Do something great – Citizen science. British Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/4BZZdHm64S051q2lnZ1Nr7p/citizen-science
Bell, S. J. (2023). We’re all about openness except when it comes to our workspaces. College and Research Libraries News, 84(9). https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/26062
Candela, G., Chambers, S., and Sherratt, T. (2023). An approach to assess the quality of Jupyter projects published by GLAM institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(13), 1550–1564. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.24835
Cassafieres, C. S. (2023). Open science infrastructures: Support from the University of Paris Nanterre (UPN) academic and research libraries. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/2814
Cavalier, D., Nickerson, C., Salthouse, R., and Stanton, D. (2019). The librarian’s guide to citizen science: Understanding, planning, and sustaining ongoing engagement in citizen science at your library. Scistarter and Arizona State University. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/orrery-media/misc/CitSci_Librarians_Guide_03_12.pdf
Chalmers, R. (2012, October 29). Explainer: What is the open movement? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-the-open-movement-10308
Chinn, S., and Hasell, A. (2023). Support for “doing your own research” is associated with COVID-19 misperceptions and scientific mistrust. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 4(3). https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/support-for-doing-your-own-research-is-associated-with-covid-19-misperceptions-and-scientific-mistrust/
Cigarini, A., Bonhure, I., Vicens, J, and Perello, J. (2021). Public libraries embrace citizen science: Strengths and challenges. Library and Information Science Research, 43, 101090. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818821000207
Citizen Science (2023, November 18). In Wikipedia: Free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_science
Cole, N. L., Kormann, E., Klebel, T., Apartis, S., and Ross-Hellauer, T. (2024, February 22). The societal impact of Open Science: A scoping review. SocArXiv preprint. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/tqrwg
CUNY. (2023). Authentic research experience in microbiology. City University of New York. https://arem.cuny.edu/sites
EOSC. (2023). European Open Science Cloud. https://eosc.eu/eosc-about
European Commission. (2024). European Commission proposal for a council recommendation on enhancing research security. https/research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/ec_rtd_council-recommendation-research-security
FAIR data. (2024, March 10). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_data
Farkas, M. G. (2023). Neither open nor equitable: the high cost of open offices. College and Research Libraries News, 84(11). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.11.407
Fay, B. (2023, November 22). Rewarding excellence in open data. MIT EECS. https://www.eecs.mit.edu/rewarding-excellence-in-open-data
Framingham State University. (2023). The OPEN movements. LibGuide, Whitmore Library. https://libguides.framingham.edu/open_movement
Giustini, D., Read, K. B., Deardorff, A., Federer, L., and Rethlefsen, M. L. (2021). Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: A scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4), 50–560. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34858084
Granger, B. E., and Pérez, F. (2021). Jupyter: Thinking and storytelling with code and data. Computing in Science & Engineering, 23(2), 7–14. 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3059263
Hansen, J. S. (Ed.). (2021). Citizen science skilling for library staff, researchers, and the public. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. https://cs4rl.github.io/skills/
Havens, L. (2020, December 23). Exploring collections as data with Jupyter Notebooks. National Library of Scotland. https://data.nls.uk/projects/exploring-collections-as-data-with-jupyter-notebooks
Highfield, R. (2015, March 6). Three centuries of citizen science. Science Museum. https://blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/three-centuries-of-citizen-science
Ignat, T., and Ayris, P. (2020). Built to last! Embedding open science principles and practices into European universities. Insights: The UKSG journal, 33(9–12), 1–19. https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.501
Jarry, J. (2022, April 14). Doing your own research a little bit better. McGill Office of Science and Society Blog. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking/doing-your-own-research-little-bit-better
Kaarsted, T., Blake, O., Nielsen, K. H., Alving, B., Rasmussen, L. T., Overgaard, A. K., and Hansen, S. M. (2023). How European research libraries can support citizen-enhanced open science. Open Information Science, 7(1), 20220146. doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0146
Leonelli, S. (2022). Open science and epistemic diversity: Friends or foes? Philosophy of Science, 89(5), 991–1001. doi:10.1017/psa.2022.45
Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0D049ECF635F3B676C03C6868873E406/9781009416399AR.pdf/philosophy_of_open_science.pdf
Levy, N. (2022). Do your own research! Synthese, 200(356). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03793-w#citeas
LIBER. (2018). LIBER Open Science Roadmap. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/LIBER_OSR_A5-ONLINE-HR-1.pdf
LIBER. (2020). Implementing FAIR data principles: The role of libraries. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/LIBER-FAIR-Data.pdf
LIBER. (2022). A practical guide to FAIR practices in research libraries. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/A-Practical-Guide-to-FAIR-Practices-in-Research-Libraries-2022.pdf
Liu, L., and Liu, W. (2023). The engagement of academic libraries in open science: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49, 102711. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102711.
Marshall, M. B., Pinfield, S., Abbott, P., Cox, A., Alperin, J. P., Barata, G., Chtena, N., Dorsch, I., Fleerackers, A., Oliveira, M., and Peters, I. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: An analysis of expert opinion. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xy874
Martek, A., Mučnjak, D., and Mumelaš, D. (2022). Citizen science in Europe: Challenges in conducting citizen science activities in cooperation of university and public libraries. Publications, 10, 52. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/52
MCLD. (2023). Citizen Science. Maricopa County Library District. https://mcldaz.org/subject/citizen-science
Mićunivic, M., Rako, S., and Feldvari, K. (2023). Open Educational Resources (OERs) at European higher education institutions in the field of library and Information science during COVID-19 pandemic. Publications, 11(3), 38. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/38
Mumelaš, D., and Martek, A. (2024). Benefits of citizen science for libraries. Publications, 12(1), 8. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/8
National Library of Sweden. (2024, February 15). The National Library of Sweden makes strategic decision to implement a new Library Service Platform. Library Technology Guides. https://librarytechnology.org/pr/29785/the-national-library-of-sweden-makes-strategic-decision-to-implement-a-new-library-service-platform
Nduta, A. (2023). A brief history of open source. freeCodeCamp. https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/brief-history-of-open-source
NNLM. (2023). Citizen science and crowdsourcing. Network of the National Library of Medicine. https://www.nnlm.gov/initiatives/ccs
Open Data Handbook. (2023). Definition of open movement. https://opendatahandbook.org/glossary/en/terms/open-movement
PathOS. (2024). PathOS: Open science impact pathways. https://pathos-project.eu
Peet, L. (2017, October 26). Arizona State to partner with public libraries on citizen science. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/arizona-state-partner-public-libraries-citizen-science
Peršić, A., and Straza, T. (2023). Open Science for all: Implementing the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science for an equitable and just transition to open science. College and Research Library News, 84(10), 377. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/26114/34046
Pinfield, S. (2024). Achieving global open access: The need for scientific, epistemic and participatory openness. Routledge.
Pryde, J. (2021, November 29). How to actually “do your own research”. Book Riot. https://bookriot.com/how-to-do-your-own-research
Putnings, M. (2023). Open Library Badge: An incentive system for more openness in libraries. https://zenodo.org/records/7689138
Re3data. (2023). About Re3data. https://www.re3data.org/about
Ross [sic]. (2021, November 2). Do your own research? A reference librarian’s recommendations. Denver Public Libraries. https://www.denverlibrary.org/blog/research/ross/do-your-own-research-reference-librarians-recommendations
Scistarter. (2021). Libraries as community hubs for citizen science. https://scistarter.org/library-training
SDU. (2020). Find a lake: Help scientists gather information on water quality. University of Southern Denmark. https://www.sdu.dk/en/findalake
Sense about Science. (2024). Ask for evidence. https://senseaboutscience.org/ask-for-evidence
Siegel, E. (2020, July 30). You must not “do your own research” when it comes to science. Forbes Science Newsletter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/07/30/you-must-not-do-your-own-research-when-it-comes-to-science/
SPIPOLL. (n.d.). SPIPOLL, take pictures of pollinating insects. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. https://www.mnhn.fr/en/spipoll-take-pictures-of-pollinating-insects
Stojanovski, J., and Grabarić Andronovski, I. (2023). Toward a new world in scholarly communication: The 9th PUBMET2022 Conference in the context of open science. Publications, 11(3), 39. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/39
Suggitt, A., and Auffret, A. (2023, November 1). Our new map reveals the effects of 20th century land-use and climate change on Britain’s wild species. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/our-new-map-reveals-the-effects-of-20th-century-land-use-and-climate-change-on-britains-wild-species-215832
Torres L., and Hartley R. (2019). Repositories for academic products/outputs: Latin American and Chilean visions. F1000Res. https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1517
Tzanova, S. (2020). Changes in academic libraries in the era of Open Science. Education for Information, 36(3), 281–299. https://content.iospress.com/articles/education-for-information/efi190259
UCL. (2023). Citizen science projects at UCL. University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/open-science-research-support/open-science/citizen-science/citizen-science-projects-ucl
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on Open Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-science
Wallis, K. (Ed.). (2023). Library infrastructures and citizen science. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. https://libereurope.eu/working-group/liber-citizen-science-working-group/citizen-science-guide
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2024 dr. David Bawden, dr. Lyn Robinson
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 mednarodno licenco.