Vloge knjižnic v odprti znanosti

Mednarodni vidiki in primeri

Avtorji

  • dr. David Bawden City, UNiversity of London
  • dr. Lyn Robinson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.68.2-3.4

Ključne besede:

odprta znanost, odprto gibanje, knjižnice, pregled

Povzetek

Namen: Pregled pomena odprte znanosti za knjižnice v kontekstu širšega odprtega gibanja z mednarodnimi vidiki in primeri iz nacionalnih, visokošolskih in splošnih knjižnic.

Metodologija/pristop: Predstavljena je kvalitativna sinteza najnovejše literature in spletnih virov.

Rezultati: Posebna pozornost je namenjena potrebi po odprtih knjižničnih infrastrukturah, podpori občanski znanosti, komuniciranju odprte znanosti in knjižnicam kot demonstratorkam odprtih tehnologij. Avtorji predlagajo, da so knjižnice v dobrem položaju za podporo in spodbujanje gibanja za odprto znanost, vendar je treba upoštevati praktična vprašanja politik in virov ter filozofske vidike odprtosti.

Omejitve raziskave: Pregled literature je selektiven namesto izčrpen, večina gradiva pa prihaja iz Evrope in Severne Amerike.

Izvirnost/uporabnost raziskave: Pregled je namenjen v podporo knjižničarjem pri realističnih razmislekih o priložnostih, ki jih ponuja gibanje za odprto znanost.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Ackerman, R. (2023, August 17). The future of open source is still very much in flux. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/08/17/1077498/future-open-source

Alotaibi, F. A. A., Johnson, F., and Rowley, J. (2021). Google Scholar or university digital libraries: A comparison of student perceptions and intention to use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 889–1168. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09610006221111197

Ames, S., and Havens, L. (2022). Exploring National Library of Scotland datasets with Jupyter Notebooks. IFLA Journal, 48(1), 50–56. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03400352211065484

Arthur, P. L., Hearn, L. Ryan, J. C., Menon, N., and Khumalo, L. (2023). Making open scholarship more equitable and inclusive. Publications, 11, 41. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/41

Ball, J., Stone, G., and Thompson, S. (2021). Opening up the library: Transforming our policies, practices and structures. Liber Quarterly, 31(1), 1–16. https://liberquarterly.eu/article/view/10882

Ballantyne, N., and Dunning, D. (2022, January 3). Skeptics say “Do your own research”. It’s not that simple. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html

BBC. (n.d.). Do something great – Citizen science. British Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/4BZZdHm64S051q2lnZ1Nr7p/citizen-science

Bell, S. J. (2023). We’re all about openness except when it comes to our workspaces. College and Research Libraries News, 84(9). https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/26062

Candela, G., Chambers, S., and Sherratt, T. (2023). An approach to assess the quality of Jupyter projects published by GLAM institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(13), 1550–1564. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.24835

Cassafieres, C. S. (2023). Open science infrastructures: Support from the University of Paris Nanterre (UPN) academic and research libraries. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/2814

Cavalier, D., Nickerson, C., Salthouse, R., and Stanton, D. (2019). The librarian’s guide to citizen science: Understanding, planning, and sustaining ongoing engagement in citizen science at your library. Scistarter and Arizona State University. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/orrery-media/misc/CitSci_Librarians_Guide_03_12.pdf

Chalmers, R. (2012, October 29). Explainer: What is the open movement? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-the-open-movement-10308

Chinn, S., and Hasell, A. (2023). Support for “doing your own research” is associated with COVID-19 misperceptions and scientific mistrust. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 4(3). https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/support-for-doing-your-own-research-is-associated-with-covid-19-misperceptions-and-scientific-mistrust/

Cigarini, A., Bonhure, I., Vicens, J, and Perello, J. (2021). Public libraries embrace citizen science: Strengths and challenges. Library and Information Science Research, 43, 101090. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818821000207

Citizen Science (2023, November 18). In Wikipedia: Free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_science

Cole, N. L., Kormann, E., Klebel, T., Apartis, S., and Ross-Hellauer, T. (2024, February 22). The societal impact of Open Science: A scoping review. SocArXiv preprint. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/tqrwg

CUNY. (2023). Authentic research experience in microbiology. City University of New York. https://arem.cuny.edu/sites

EOSC. (2023). European Open Science Cloud. https://eosc.eu/eosc-about

European Commission. (2024). European Commission proposal for a council recommendation on enhancing research security. https/research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/ec_rtd_council-recommendation-research-security

FAIR data. (2024, March 10). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_data

Farkas, M. G. (2023). Neither open nor equitable: the high cost of open offices. College and Research Libraries News, 84(11). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.11.407

Fay, B. (2023, November 22). Rewarding excellence in open data. MIT EECS. https://www.eecs.mit.edu/rewarding-excellence-in-open-data

Framingham State University. (2023). The OPEN movements. LibGuide, Whitmore Library. https://libguides.framingham.edu/open_movement

Giustini, D., Read, K. B., Deardorff, A., Federer, L., and Rethlefsen, M. L. (2021). Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: A scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4), 50–560. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34858084

Granger, B. E., and Pérez, F. (2021). Jupyter: Thinking and storytelling with code and data. Computing in Science & Engineering, 23(2), 7–14. 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3059263

Hansen, J. S. (Ed.). (2021). Citizen science skilling for library staff, researchers, and the public. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. https://cs4rl.github.io/skills/

Havens, L. (2020, December 23). Exploring collections as data with Jupyter Notebooks. National Library of Scotland. https://data.nls.uk/projects/exploring-collections-as-data-with-jupyter-notebooks

Highfield, R. (2015, March 6). Three centuries of citizen science. Science Museum. https://blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/three-centuries-of-citizen-science

Ignat, T., and Ayris, P. (2020). Built to last! Embedding open science principles and practices into European universities. Insights: The UKSG journal, 33(9–12), 1–19. https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.501

Jarry, J. (2022, April 14). Doing your own research a little bit better. McGill Office of Science and Society Blog. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking/doing-your-own-research-little-bit-better

Kaarsted, T., Blake, O., Nielsen, K. H., Alving, B., Rasmussen, L. T., Overgaard, A. K., and Hansen, S. M. (2023). How European research libraries can support citizen-enhanced open science. Open Information Science, 7(1), 20220146. doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0146

Leonelli, S. (2022). Open science and epistemic diversity: Friends or foes? Philosophy of Science, 89(5), 991–1001. doi:10.1017/psa.2022.45

Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0D049ECF635F3B676C03C6868873E406/9781009416399AR.pdf/philosophy_of_open_science.pdf

Levy, N. (2022). Do your own research! Synthese, 200(356). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03793-w#citeas

LIBER. (2018). LIBER Open Science Roadmap. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/LIBER_OSR_A5-ONLINE-HR-1.pdf

LIBER. (2020). Implementing FAIR data principles: The role of libraries. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/LIBER-FAIR-Data.pdf

LIBER. (2022). A practical guide to FAIR practices in research libraries. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association of European Research Libraries. https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/A-Practical-Guide-to-FAIR-Practices-in-Research-Libraries-2022.pdf

Liu, L., and Liu, W. (2023). The engagement of academic libraries in open science: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49, 102711. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102711.

Marshall, M. B., Pinfield, S., Abbott, P., Cox, A., Alperin, J. P., Barata, G., Chtena, N., Dorsch, I., Fleerackers, A., Oliveira, M., and Peters, I. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: An analysis of expert opinion. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xy874

Martek, A., Mučnjak, D., and Mumelaš, D. (2022). Citizen science in Europe: Challenges in conducting citizen science activities in cooperation of university and public libraries. Publications, 10, 52. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/52

MCLD. (2023). Citizen Science. Maricopa County Library District. https://mcldaz.org/subject/citizen-science

Mićunivic, M., Rako, S., and Feldvari, K. (2023). Open Educational Resources (OERs) at European higher education institutions in the field of library and Information science during COVID-19 pandemic. Publications, 11(3), 38. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/38

Mumelaš, D., and Martek, A. (2024). Benefits of citizen science for libraries. Publications, 12(1), 8. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/8

National Library of Sweden. (2024, February 15). The National Library of Sweden makes strategic decision to implement a new Library Service Platform. Library Technology Guides. https://librarytechnology.org/pr/29785/the-national-library-of-sweden-makes-strategic-decision-to-implement-a-new-library-service-platform

Nduta, A. (2023). A brief history of open source. freeCodeCamp. https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/brief-history-of-open-source

NNLM. (2023). Citizen science and crowdsourcing. Network of the National Library of Medicine. https://www.nnlm.gov/initiatives/ccs

Open Data Handbook. (2023). Definition of open movement. https://opendatahandbook.org/glossary/en/terms/open-movement

PathOS. (2024). PathOS: Open science impact pathways. https://pathos-project.eu

Peet, L. (2017, October 26). Arizona State to partner with public libraries on citizen science. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/arizona-state-partner-public-libraries-citizen-science

Peršić, A., and Straza, T. (2023). Open Science for all: Implementing the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science for an equitable and just transition to open science. College and Research Library News, 84(10), 377. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/26114/34046

Pinfield, S. (2024). Achieving global open access: The need for scientific, epistemic and participatory openness. Routledge.

Pryde, J. (2021, November 29). How to actually “do your own research”. Book Riot. https://bookriot.com/how-to-do-your-own-research

Putnings, M. (2023). Open Library Badge: An incentive system for more openness in libraries. https://zenodo.org/records/7689138

Re3data. (2023). About Re3data. https://www.re3data.org/about

Ross [sic]. (2021, November 2). Do your own research? A reference librarian’s recommendations. Denver Public Libraries. https://www.denverlibrary.org/blog/research/ross/do-your-own-research-reference-librarians-recommendations

Scistarter. (2021). Libraries as community hubs for citizen science. https://scistarter.org/library-training

SDU. (2020). Find a lake: Help scientists gather information on water quality. University of Southern Denmark. https://www.sdu.dk/en/findalake

Sense about Science. (2024). Ask for evidence. https://senseaboutscience.org/ask-for-evidence

Siegel, E. (2020, July 30). You must not “do your own research” when it comes to science. Forbes Science Newsletter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/07/30/you-must-not-do-your-own-research-when-it-comes-to-science/

SPIPOLL. (n.d.). SPIPOLL, take pictures of pollinating insects. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. https://www.mnhn.fr/en/spipoll-take-pictures-of-pollinating-insects

Stojanovski, J., and Grabarić Andronovski, I. (2023). Toward a new world in scholarly communication: The 9th PUBMET2022 Conference in the context of open science. Publications, 11(3), 39. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/39

Suggitt, A., and Auffret, A. (2023, November 1). Our new map reveals the effects of 20th century land-use and climate change on Britain’s wild species. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/our-new-map-reveals-the-effects-of-20th-century-land-use-and-climate-change-on-britains-wild-species-215832

Torres L., and Hartley R. (2019). Repositories for academic products/outputs: Latin American and Chilean visions. F1000Res. https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1517

Tzanova, S. (2020). Changes in academic libraries in the era of Open Science. Education for Information, 36(3), 281–299. https://content.iospress.com/articles/education-for-information/efi190259

UCL. (2023). Citizen science projects at UCL. University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library/open-science-research-support/open-science/citizen-science/citizen-science-projects-ucl

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on Open Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-science

Wallis, K. (Ed.). (2023). Library infrastructures and citizen science. LIBER Citizen Science Working Group. https://libereurope.eu/working-group/liber-citizen-science-working-group/citizen-science-guide

Objavljeno

10.10.2024

Kako citirati

Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2024). Vloge knjižnic v odprti znanosti: Mednarodni vidiki in primeri. Knjižnica: Revija Za področje Bibliotekarstva in Informacijske Znanosti, 68(2-3), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.68.2-3.4