Zakaj je pomembno branje na višji ravni
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.68.1.3Ključne besede:
branje na višji ravni, pismenost, bralna pismenost, razvoj pismenosti, razvoj bralne pismenosti, razvoj branja, poučevanje branja, raziskave branjaPovzetek
Družbe se soočajo s korenitimi spremembami, saj digitalne tehnologije spreminjajo načine življenja, komuniciranja, dela, študija in branja. Družbeni in kulturni vpliv procesa digitalizacije na bralne spretnosti in prakse sta še vedno premalo raziskana. Čeprav digitalne tehnologije ponujajo veliko možnosti za nove oblike branja, nedavne empirične raziskave kažejo, da digitalno okolje negativno vpliva na branje, zlasti na dolge oblike branja in bralno razumevanje. Prav tako ostaja nejasno, ali prehod na digitalne medije dejansko izpolnjuje svoje obljube o izboljšanju učnih rezultatov. Nedavne raziskave različnih vrst kažejo na upad ključnih bralnih kompetenc in praks na višji ravni, kot so kritično in zavestno branje, počasno branje, nestrateško branje in dolgo branje. Sedanja izobraževalna politika pa se močno opira na monokulturno standardizirano preverjanje osnovnih bralnih zmožnosti in na vse večjo uporabo digitalnih tehnologij. Poučevanje in ocenjevanje branja, raziskave branja in oblikovanje politik spodbujanja branja bi se morali bolj osredotočiti na bralne prakse na višjih ravneh tako pri odraslih kot otrocih, da bi razumeli razvoj bralnih spretnosti in praks v dobi, ki je vse bolj odvisna od vseprisotne digitalne infrastrukture.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ackerman, R. in Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2015. Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Attridge, D. (2004). The singularity of literature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420447
Atwood, M. (1993). The robber bride. Bloomsbury.
Baron, N. S. (2021). How we read now: Effective strategies for print, screen and audio. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190084097.001.0001
Barzilai, S. and Ka’adan, I. (2017). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition Learning, 12(2), 193–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7
Bastemeijer, L. (2021). Required listening: The effects of using audio- and karaokebooks in fiction education at Dutch vmbo schools. [M.A. thesis]. Leiden University.
Bavishi, A., Slade, M. D. in Levy, B. R. (2016). A chapter a day: Association of book reading with longevity. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.014
Billington, J. (ed). (2019). Reading and mental health. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4
Boulos Walker, M. (2017). Slow philosophy: Reading against the institution. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474279949
Bowker, L. and Buitrago Ciro, J. (2019). Machine translation and global research: Towards improved machine translation literacy in the scholarly community. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787567214
Boyes, M. E., Leitao, S., Claessen, M., Badcock, N. A. and Nayton, M. (2016). Why are reading difficulties associated with mental health problems? Dyslexia, 22(3), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1531
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F. in Durik, A. M. (2017). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682860
Brosch, R. (2018). What we ‘see’ when we read: Visualization and vividness in reading fictional narratives. Cortex, 105, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.020
Buddeberg, K., Dutz, G., Grotlüschen, A., Heilmann, L. in Stammer, C. (2020). Low literacy in Germany: Results from the second German literacy survey. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 11(1), 127–143. https://rela.ep.liu.se/article/view/3869
Castano, E., Martingano, A. J. in Perconti, P. (2020). The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception. PLoS One, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233378
Castles, A., Rastle, K. in Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Clarke Hillyer, G., Beauchemin, M., Garcia, F., Kelsen, M., Brogan, F.L., Schwartz, G.K. in Basch, C.H. (2020). Readability of cancer clinical trials Websites. Cancer Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274819901125
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. in Leu, D. J. (ur.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates / Taylor & Francis Group.
Common Core State Standards Initiative, n. d. Common core standards for English language arts, Appendix A: Research supporting key elements of the standards. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf
Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A. in Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research, 36(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320921496
Crawford, M. B. (2015). The world beyond your head: On becoming an individual in an age of distraction. Viking.
Daraz, L., Morrow, A. S., Ponce, O. J., Farah, W., Katabi, A., Majzoub, A., Seisa, M. O., Benkhadra, R., Alsawas, M. in Prokop, L. (2018). Readability of online health information: A meta-narrative systematic review. American Journal of Medical Quality, 33(5), 487–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860617751639
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R. in Salmeróna, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Deniz, F., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., Huth, A. G. in Gallant, J. L. (2019). The representation of semantic information across human cerebral cortex during listening versus reading is invariant to stimulus modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 7.722–7.736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019
Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, European Commission. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the Independent High Level Group on Fake News and Disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2759/739290
Dodell-Feder D. in Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1.713–1.727. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395
Douglas, K., Barnett, T., Poletti, A., Seaboyer, J. in Kennedy, R. (2016). Building reading resilience: Re-thinking reading for the literary studies classroom. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087475
Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E. in Dobai, A. (2015). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134
Elguendouze, S. (2020). Simplification de textes: un eétat de l’art. Actes de la 6e conférence conjointe Journées d’Études sur la Parole. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.jeptalnrecitalrecital.8/
E-READ, n. d. What is E-READ? https://ereadcost.eu/
E-READ. (2018). Stavanger Declaration. https://ereadcost.eu/stavanger-declaration/
European Commission (EC). (2018). Tackling online disinformation: A European approach. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0236&from=DE
European Commission (EC). (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106281
Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S. in McKechnie, L. E. F. (editors). (2005). Theories of information behavior. Information Today.
Freund, L., Kopak, R. in O’Brien, H. (2016). The effects of textual environment on reading comprehension: Implications for searching as learning. Journal of Information Science, 42(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515614472
Gelles-Watnick, R. in Perrin, A. (2021, 21. september). Who doesn’t read books in America? Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/21/who-doesnt-read-books-in-america/
Gerčar, J. in van der Weel, A. (2023). Reading health and the Reading Health Index. Societies, 13(4), 1–8. 10.3390/soc13040086
Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332
Greifeneder, E. (2014). Trends in information behaviour research. Information Research, 19(4). http://informationr.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic13.html
Grotlüschen, A., Buddeberg, K., Dutz, G., Heilmann, L. in Stammer, C. (2019). LEO 2018 — Leben mit geringer Literalität. Pressebroschüre. https://leo.blogs.uni-hamburg.de/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/LEO2018-Presseheft.pdf
Haddock, G., Foad, C., Saul, V., Brown, W. in Thompson, R. (2020). The medium can influence the message: Print-based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12415
Handley, L. (2019, 19. september). Physical books still outsell e-books — and here’s why. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/19/physical-books-still-outsell-e-books-and-heres-why.html
Hartung, F. in Willems, R. M. (2020, 9. junij). Amount of fiction reading correlates with higher connectivity between cortical areas for language and mentalizing. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.139923
Hayles, N. K. (2007). Hyper and deep attention: The generational divide in cognitive modes. Profession, 187–199.
Henry-Huthmacher, C. in Hoffmann, E. (ur.). (2016). Ausbildungsreife & Studierfähigkeit.Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_44796-544-1- 30.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1036
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(186), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
Jerrim, J. in Moss, G. (2019). The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3498
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S. in Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
Kovač, M. in van der Weel, A. (2018). Reading in a post-textual era. First Monday, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i10.9416
Kovač, M., Phillips, A., van der Weel, A. in Wischenbart, R. (2019). What is a book? Publishing Research Quarterly, 35, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09665-5
L. Varao-Sousa, T., Carriere, J. S. A. in Smilek, D. (2013). The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(892). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00892
Lacy, M. (ur.). (2014). The slow book revolution: Creating a new culture of reading on college campuses and beyond. Libraries Unlimited.
Lavie, N., Beck, D. M. in Konstantinou, N. (2014). Blinded by the load: Attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1641), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0205
Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J. in Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Information Paper, 51. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacyskills-2018-en.pdf
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Marston William, J. in Schweickert, R. (ur.). (2011). Theory of mind and literature. Purdue University Press.
Literacy Trust, n. d. Adult literacy. https://literacytrust.org.uk/parents-and-families/adult-literacy/
Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
McClelland, T. (2020). The mental affordance hypothesis. Mind, 129(514), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz036
McLean, C. A. (2020). The shallows? The nature and properties of digital/screen reading. Reading Teacher, 73(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1876
Michael, E. B., Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A. in Just, M. A. (2001). »fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes,« Human Brain Mapping, 13, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1036
Miedema, J. (2009). Slow reading. Litwin Books.
Mikics, D. (2013). Slow reading in a hurried age. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Minguela, M., Solé, I. in Pieschl, S. (2015). Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: Evidence from online and offline measures. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 721–744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9547-2
Mizrachi, D. in Salaz, A. M. (2020). Beyond the surveys: Qualitative analysis from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS). College & Research Libraries, 81(5), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.808
Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S. in Boustany, J. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLoS One, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
Mohrhard, J. J. (2018). Slow Reading: Der neue Lesetrend. Mainzer Institut für Buchwissenschaft.
Mumper, M. L. in Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089
Nahl, D. in Bilal, D. (2007). Information and emotion: The emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory. Information Today.
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. in Gallagher, S. (ur.). (2018). Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, n. d. a. PISA 2018 results. Volume I: What students know and can do. ttps://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i-5f07c754-en.htm
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, n. d. b. PIAAC design. https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/piaacdesign/
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Pisa 2018: Reading Literacy Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_5c07e4f1-en
Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A.-L. in González López Ledesma, A. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291
Perin, D. (ur.). (2019). Wiley handbook of adult literacy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Pfost, M., Dörfler, T. in Artelt, C. (2013). Students’ extracurricular reading behaviour and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008
Poletti, A., Seaboyer, J., Kennedy, R., Barnett, T. in Douglas, K. (2016). The affects of not reading: Hating characters, being bored, feeling stupid. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214556898
Rapp, D. N. (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416649347
Rea, A. (2020). How serious is America’s literacy problem? Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/?detailStory=How-Serious-Is-Americas-Literacy-Problem
Reiss, K., Weis, M., Klieme, E. in Köller, O. (ur.). (2019). PISA 2018: Grundbildung im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:18315
Rosa, H. (2005). Beschleunigung: Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Suhrkamp.
Rose, E. (2013). On reflection: An essay on technology, education, and the status of thought in the 21st century. Canadian Scholars Press.
Rosebrock, C. (2020). Netzlektüre und Deep Reading: Entmischungen der Lesekultur. https://www.leseforum.ch/sysModules/obxLeseforum/Artikel/694/2020_2_de_rosebrock.pdf
Salovich, N. A. in Rapp, D. N. (2021). Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000977
Scharrer, L. in Salmerón, L. (2016). Sourcing in the reading process: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1,539–1,548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9676-2
Scharrer, L., Rupieper, Y., Stadtler, M. in Bromme, R. (2017). When science becomes too easy: Science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts. Public Understanding of Science, 26(8), 1003–1,018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516680311
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M. in Bromme, R. (2019). Judging scientific information: Does source evaluation prevent the seductive effect of text easiness? Learning and Instruction, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101215
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
Schüller-Zwierlein, A. (2017). Die Bibliothek als Lesezentrum. o-bib, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H2S14-34
Schüller-Zwierlein, A. (ur.). (2017). Informationskompetenz, Informationsverhalten, Informationsverarbeitung.Universitätsbibliothek. https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.36337
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sikka, P. in Mago, V. (2020). A survey on text simplification. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08612
Simas da Rocha, B., Garcia Moraes, C., Okumura, L. M., da Cruz, F., Sirtori, L. in da Silva Pons, E. (2021). Interventions to reduce problems related to the readability and comprehensibility of drug packages and labels: A systematic review. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(8), e1494–e1506. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000619
Singer, L. M. in Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1.007–1.041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
Singer, P. W. in Brooking, E. T. (2018). LikeWar: The weaponization of social media. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Spante, M., Sofkova Hashemi, S., Lundin, M. in Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Statista. (2022). Anzahl der Personen in Deutschland, die Bücher lesen, nach Häufigkeit von 2017 bis 2021. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/171231/umfrage/haeufigkeit-des-lesens-von-einembuch/
Stewart, C. R. in Yap, S.-F. (2020). Low literacy, policy and consumer vulnerability: Are we really doing enough? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12569
Štajner, S. in Saggion, H. (2018). Data-driven text simplification. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Abstracts, 19–23. https://aclanthology.org/C18-3005.pdf
Tegethoff, D. (2019). Readability of information material in obstetrics. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, 44(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1014-3619
van den Bercken, L., Sips, J. R. in Lofi, C. (2019). Evaluating neural text simplification in the medical domain. WWW ‘19: World Wide Web Conference, 3.286–3.292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313630
van der Weel, A. (2018). Where will the digital turn in reading take us? V: Proot, G., McKit¬terick, D., Nuovo, A. in Gehl, P. F. (ured.). Lux librorum: Essays on books and history for Chris Coppens, 229–236. Flanders Book Historical Society.
Wicht, A., Durda, T., Krejcik, L., Artelt, C., Grotlüschen, A., Rammstedt, B. in Lechner, C. M. (2021). Low literacy is not set in stone: Longitudinal evidence on the development of low literacy during adulthood. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 67(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZPB2101109
Wild, J. in Glondys, M. (2020). Vom Papyrus zum Laptop: Digitale Leseprozesse fördern. Erziehung und Unterricht, 7–8, 641–650.
Wilson, T. D. (2010). Fifty years of information behavior research. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2010.1720360308
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. HarperCollins.
Wolf, M. in Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32–37.
Worth, S. E. (2017). In defense of reading. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Xu, W., Callison-Burch, C. in Napoles, C. (2015). Problems in current text simplification research: New data can help. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 3, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00139
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2024 André Schüller-Zwierlein, Anne Mangen, Miha Kovač, Adriaan van der Weel
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Kako citirati
