Scribal Networks and the Language of Urban Administration

Variation and Change in Sixteenth-Century Coventry

Authors

  • Tino Oudesluijs University of Manchester, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.63.1-2.41-62

Keywords:

Early Modern English, urban administration, Standard English, Coventry, legal language

Abstract

This paper considers Early Modern English urban administration in light of the developing supralocal/standard variety. Previously, research scrutinising the language of administration has focused on Middle English rather than on Early Modern English, where studies have thus far mostly focused on private correspondence and printed texts. To shed more light on the language of this under-investigated text type for this period, in this paper I investigate a collection of indentured texts written in Coventry between 1499 and 1600 and explore its language. More specifically, I analyse the use of periphrastic DO, which I subsequently contextualise both in Coventry’s local civic history – focusing on the people involved in creating the documents, e.g. the town clerk and his team of scribes – as well as in the general development of periphrastic DO with regard to the emerging supralocal/standard variety of English. The analysis reveals that periphrastic DO was used to a different extent compared to other text types from the period, most notably that it did not show a decline in the second half of the sixteenth century after what can be described as a ‘slow start’ in the first half. This change in use can be tentatively attributed to a variety of factors in Coventry’s civic history, particularly in the 1570s, but more data from other urban centres is needed to better contextualise this.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALCOLADO CARNICERO, José Miguel (2017) “Bridges of innovation and change: the English language around the networks of the Mercery of London.” In: Esther-Miriam Wagner/Bettina Beinhoff/Ben Outhwaite (eds), Merchants of Innovation. The Languages of Traders. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter, 40–67.

BAKER, J. H. (1999) “The books of the common law.” In: Lotte Hellinga/Joseph Burney Trapp (eds), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. III: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 411–432.

BAKER, J. H. (2015) “Fitzherbert, Sir Anthony (c. 1470–1538).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/9602 [accessed on 14 August 2022].

BERGS, Alexander (2005) Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston letters (1421–1503). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

BEVAN, Kitrina Lindsay (2013) Clerks and scriveners: Legal literacy and access to justice in Late Medieval England. [PhD Thesis.] Exeter: University of Exeter dissertation.

BHATIA, Vijay K. (1987) “Language of the law.” Language Teaching 20/4, 227–234.

BISHOP, Jennifer (2016) “The Clerk’s Tale: Civic Writing in Sixteenth-Century London.” Past & Present 230/1, 112–130.

BRITAIN, David (2010) “Supralocal Regional Dialect Levelling.” In: Carmen Llamas/Dominic Watt (eds), Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 193–204.

CARTER, Thomas James (2011) The Civic Reformation in Coventry, 1530–1580. Oxford: Oxford University doctoral thesis.

CLANCHY, Michael T. (2013 [1979]) From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307 (3rd edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

CUENCA, Esther Liberman (2018) “Town clerks & the authorship of custumals in medieval England.” Urban History 46/2, 180–201.

DAWSONS OF PALL MALL. 1963[1817]. The statutes of the realm printed by command of His Majesty King George the Third in pursuance of an address of the House of Commons of Great Britain, Vol. I.

DENISON, David (1993) English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London/New York: Longman.

DENISON, David (1985) “The Origins of Periphrastic Do: Ellegård and Visser Reconsidered.” In: Roger Eaton/Olga Fischer/ Willem Koopman/Frederike van der Leek (eds), Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 10–13, 1985. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45–60.

DOBSON, Barrie (2000) “General Survey 1300–1540.” In: David M. Palliser (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History, Volume 1: 600–1540. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–290.

ECKERT, Penelope (2006) “Communities of Practice.” In: Edward Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam/London: Elsevier, 683–685.

ECKERT, Penelope/Sally McCONNELL-GINET (1999) “New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research.” Language in Society 28/2, 185–201.

ELLEGÅRD, Alvar (1953) The Auxiliary do. The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

ELSPAß, Stephan (2015) “Private letters as a source for an alternative history of Middle High New German.” In: Anita Auer/Daniel Schreier/Richard Watts (eds), Letter writing and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–52.

GORDON, Moragh (2017) The Urban Vernacular of Late Medieval and Renaissance Bristol. Utrecht: LOT.

GORDON, Moragh/Tino OUDESLUIJS/Anita AUER (2020) “Supralocalisation Processes in Early Modern English Urban Vernaculars: New Manuscript Evidence from Bristol, Coventry and York.” International Journal of English Studies 20/2, 47–66.

GOTTI, Maurizio (2012) “Text and genre.” In: Peter M. Tiersma/Lawrence M. Solan (eds), 52–66.

HARRIS, Mary Dormer (1907–1913) The Coventry Leet Book or Mayor’s Register, Parts I–IV (Early English Text Society [Old Series] 134, 135, 138, 146). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., Ltd.

HARTRICH, Eliza (2017) “Charters and inter-urban networks: England, 1439–1449.” English Historical Review 132/555, 219–249.

HILTUNEN, Risto (2012) “The grammar and structure of legal texts.” In: Peter M. Tiersma/Lawrence M. Solan (eds), 39–51.

KLEMOLA, Juhani (1996) Non-standard periphrastic DO: A study in variation and change. Colchester: University of Essex dissertation.

KOCH, Peter/Wulf Oesterreicher (2012) “Language of Immediacy – Language of Distance: Orality and Literacy from the Perspective of Language Theory and Linguistic History.” In: Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber/Göran Wolf (eds), Communicative Spaces. Variation, Contact, and Change – Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 441–473.

KOPACZYK, Joanna (2013) The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs. Standardization and Lexical Bundles 1380–1560. Oxford: Oxford University press.

MATTILA, Heikki E.S. (2006) Comparative legal linguistics. Transl. by Christopher Goddard. Aldershot: Ashgate.

MATTILA, Heikki E. S. (2012) “Legal vocabulary.” In: P. M. Tiersma/L. M. Solan (eds), 27–38.

MCGRORY, David (2003) A History of Coventry. Chichester: Phillimore and Company Limited.

MILROY, James/Lesley MILROY (1985) “Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation.” Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384.

MOESSNER, Lilo (2018) “Old English wills: A genre study.” In: Peter Petré/Hubert Cuyckens/Frauke D’Hoedt (eds), Sociocultural dimensions of lexis and text in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 103–124.

MOSTERT, Marco/Anna ADAMSKA (2014) “Introduction.” In: Marco Mostert/Anna Adamska (eds), Writing and the Administration of Medieval Towns. Medieval Urban Literacy I. Turnhout: Brepols, 1–10.

MUSSON, Anthony (2001) Medieval Law in Context: The Growth of Legal Consciousness from Magna Carta to the Peasants Revolt. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.

NEVALAINEN, Terttu (1991) “Motivated archaism: the use of affirmative periphrastic do in Early Modern English liturgical prose.” In: Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English Syntax. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 303–320.

NEVALAINEN, Terttu (2000) “Mobility, Social Networks and Language Change in Early Modern England.” European Journal of English Studies 4/3, 253–264.

NEVALAINEN, Terttu (2000) “Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the early Modern period.” In: Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero/David Denison/Richard M. Hogg/Chris B. McCully (eds), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies. A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–372.

NEVALAINEN, Terttu/Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2006. “Standardisation.” In: Richard Hogg/David Denison (eds), A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–311.

NEVALAINEN, Terttu/Helena RAUMOLIN-BRUNBERG (2017 [2003]) Historical Sociolinguistics. Language change in Tudor and Stuart England, 2nd edn. London/New York: Routledge.

NURMI, Arja (1999) A Social History of Periphrastic DO. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.

ORME, Nicholas (2006) Medieval schools: From Roman Britain to Renaissance England. Newhaven: Yale University Press.

OUDESLUIJS, Tino (2018) “Scribes as Agents of Change: Copying Practices in Administrative Texts from Fifteenth-century Coventry.” In: Margaret Tudeau-Clayton/Martin Hilpert (eds), The Challenge of Change. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 223–248.

OUDESLUIJS, Tino (2019) Language Variation and Change in Late Medieval and Early Modern Coventry. Unpublished doctoral thesis: University of Lausanne.

OUDESLUIJS, Tino/Moragh GORDON/Anita AUER (2022) “Urbanisation, supralocalisation and the development of periphrastic DO in early modern England.” Journal of Historical Syntax 6/13–18, Special issue: Cross-disciplinary approaches to linguistic variation in Early Modern West Germanic.

REES JONES, Sarah (2014) “Civic Literacy in Later Medieval England.” In: Marco Mostert/Anna Adamska (eds), Writing and the Administration of Medieval Towns. Medieval Urban Literacy I. Turnhout: Brepols, 219–230.

RISSANEN, Matti (1985) “Periphrastic do in affirmative statements in early American English.” Journal of English Linguistics 18, 163–183.

RISSANEN, Matti (1991) “Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis.” In: Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English Syntax. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 321–342.

RISSANEN, Matti (1999a) “Language of law and the development of Standard English.” In: Irma Taavitsainen/Gunnel Melchers/Päivi Pahta (eds), Writing in Non-standard English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–203.

RISSANEN, Matti (1999b) “Syntax.” In: Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–331.

RISSANEN, Matti (2000) “Standardisation and the language of the early statutes.” In: Laura Wright (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800. Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–130.

RISSANEN, Matti/Merja KYTÖ/Leena KAHLAS-TARKKA/Matti KILPIÖ/Saara NEVANLINNA/Irma TAAVITSAINEN/Terttu NEVALAINEN/Helena RAUMOLIN-BRUNBERG (1991) The Helsinki corpus of English texts: diachronic and dialectal. University of Helsinki. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus [accessed on 13 August 2022].

SCHAEFER, Ursula (2012) “Middle English: Standardization” In: Bergs, Alexander/Laurel J. Brinton (eds), English Historical Linguistics. An international handbook. Vol. I. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 519–533.

SÖDERLUND, Anders (2017) “Periphrastic do in English Witness Depositions 1560–1760.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 16/1, 244–277.

STEIN, Dieter (1990) The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of do in English. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

STEIN, Dieter/Ingrid TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE (eds) (1994) Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

STENROOS, Merja (2017) “Like the coins when currencies are combined: contextualizing the written language of fifteenth-century English merchants.” In: Esther-Miriam Wagner/Bettina Beinhoff (eds), Merchants of innovation: the languages of traders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 19–39.

STENROOS, Merja (2020) “Land documents as a source of word geography.” In: Merja Stenroos/Kjetil V. Thengs (eds), Records of Real People. Linguistic Variation in Middle English Local Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 175–202.

STENROOS, Merja/Kjetil V. THENGS (eds) (2020) Records of Real People. Linguistic Variation in Middle English Local Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

STEPHENS, W. B. (ed.) (1969) The Victoria County History of the County of Warwick, Volume VIII. The City of Coventry and Borough of Warwick. London: Oxford University Press.

STREUTKER, Ken (2016) Legal Land Legacies of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: An Introduction to the Early Indentures Held at the University of Victoria. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria MA thesis.

TEMPLEMAN, Geoffrey (1944) The Records of the Guild of the Holy Trinity, St. Mary, St. John the Baptist and St. Katherine of Coventry. Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

THRUSH, Andrew/John P. FERRIS (eds) (2010) The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1604–1629. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

TIERSMA, Peter M./Lawrence M. SOLAN (eds) (2012) The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TITTLER, Robert (1998) The Reformation and the Towns in England: Politics and Political Culture, c. 1540–1640. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

WHITLEY, T. W. (1894) The parliamentary representation of the city of Coventry from the earliest times to present date. Coventry: Curtish & Beamish.

WHITTICK, Christopher (2013) “Shelley, Sir William (1478/9–1549), lawyer.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/25315 [accessed on 14 August 2022].

Downloads

Published

27. 12. 2023

How to Cite

Oudesluijs, T. (2023). Scribal Networks and the Language of Urban Administration: Variation and Change in Sixteenth-Century Coventry. Linguistica, 63(1-2), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.63.1-2.41-62