Psihometrične značilnosti slovenske priredbe revidirane verzije generičnega vprašalnika Indeks poklicnega stresa (RG-OSI)

Avtorji

  • Nataša Sedlar
  • Gregor Sočan
  • Lilijana Šprah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.389

Ključne besede:

Vprašalnik Indeks poklicnega stresa, sestava testa, korespondenčna analiza, analiza postavk, zanesljivost

Povzetek

Revidirana verzija generičnega vprašalnika Indeks poklicnega stresa (Occupational Stress Index; RG-OSI) temelji na kognitivno-ergonomskem pristopu, ki poklicni stres analizira z vidika obremenitev na kognitivne procese zaposlenih. Model je strukturiran kot dvodimenzionalna matrika, znotraj katere je vsak element točkovan z vrednostmi od 0 do 2 (včasih z vmesnimi vrednostmi 0,5, 1,5 ali 1,75), ki so določene kot nelinearne kombinacije več kriterijev iz različnih postavk. Ker uporabljen način točkovanja v psihološkem merjenju ni pogost, smo v naši študiji želeli preveriti njegovo ustreznost in zbrati nekaj informacij o veljavnosti slovenske priredbe vprašalnika. Vprašalnik je izpolnilo 349 slovenskih zaposlenih iz različnih poklicnih skupin. Podatke smo analizirali s korespondenčno analizo, klasično analizo zanesljivosti in postavk, ter analizo TOP (teorije odgovora na postavko). Rezultati korespondenčne analize kažejo, da se kategorije odgovorov na posameznih spremenljivkah pogosto ne razvrščajo po velikosti. V nadaljevanju smo na podlagi analize zanesljivosti razvili kratko verzijo vprašalnika in zbrali nekaj podatkov o njeni veljavnosti. Raziskava kaže, da psihometrične značilnosti opisanega načina točkovanja v psihološkem merjenju niso najbolj ustrezne.

Metrike

Nalaganej metrik....

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Belkić, K. (2003). The Occupational Stress Index: An approach derived from cognitive ergonomics and brain research for clinical practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge International Science Publishing.

Belkić, K., Emdad, R. & Theorell, T. (1998). Occupational profile and cardiac risk: Possible mechanisms and implications for professional drivers. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 11, 37-57.

Belkić, K., & Nedić, O. (2007). Workplace stressors and lifestyle-related cancer risk factors among female physicians: Assessment using the occupational stress index. Journal of Occupational Health, 49, 61-71. CrossRef

Belkić, K., & Savić, C. (2008). The occupational stress index: An approach derived from cognitive ergonomics applicable to clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 6, 169-175.

Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL, USA: Scientific Software International.

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249-276. CrossRef

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. CrossRef

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. CrossRef

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Embretson, S., & Yang, X. (2013). A multicomponent latent trait model for diagnosis. Psychometrika, 78(1), 1-14. CrossRef

EU-OSHA - European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2010). European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER): Managing safety and health at work. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/esener1_osh_management

Fine, S. A., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1999). Functional job analysis: A foundation for human resources management. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 549-576. CrossRef

Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall, CRC. CrossRef

Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Burnout in organizational life. Journal of Management, 30, 859-879. CrossRef

Hollnagel, E. (2003). Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossRef

Johnson, J. V., & Hall, E. M. (1988). Job strain, workplace social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1336-1342. CrossRef

Karasek, R. A., Baker, D., Marxer, F., Ahlbom, A., & Theorell, T. (1981). Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. American Journal of Public Health, 71, 694-705. CrossRef

Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707. CrossRef

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326. CrossRef

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Niedhammer, I., Tek, M. Y., Starke, D., & Siegrist, J. (2004). Effort reward imbalance model and self-reported health: Cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1531-1541. CrossRef

Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández Macías, E., Hurley, J., & Vermeylen, G. (2005). Fourth European Working Conditions Survey. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOND). Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2006/98/en/2/ef0698en.pdf (8. 4. 2013)

Parent-Thirion, A., Vermeylen, G., van Houten, G., Lyly-Yrjänäinen, M., Biletta, I., & Cabrita, J. (2010). Fifth European Working Conditions Survey – 2010. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOND). Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2011/82/en/1/EF1182EN.pdf (8. 4. 2013)

Salavecz, G., Chandola, T., Pikhart, H., Dragano, N., Siegrist, J., Jöckel, K. H., Erbel, R., Pajak, A., Malyutina, S., Kubinova, R., Marmot, M., Bobak, M. & Kopp, M. (2010). Work stress and health in Western European and post-communist countries: An East-West comparison study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(1), 57-62. CrossRef

Scott, D., Bishop, J. W., & Chen, X. (2003). An examination of the relationship of employee involvement with job satisfaction, employee cooperation, and intention to quit in U.S. invested enterprise in China. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 3-19. CrossRef

Sedlar, N., Šprah, L., Tement, S., & Sočan, G. (2015). Internal structure of an alternative measure of burnout: Study on the Slovenian adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Burnout Research, 2(1), 1-7. CrossRef

Siegrist, J. (2002). Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. In P. L. Perrewe, D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being: Vol. 2. Historical and Current Perspectives on Stress and Health (pp. 261-291). New York, NY, USA: JAI Elsevier. CrossRef

Soori, H., Rahimi, M., & Mohseni, H. (2008). Occupational stress and work-related unintentional injuries among Iranian car manufacturing workers. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 14(3), 697-703.

Tement, S., Korunka, C., & Pfifer, A. (2010). Toward the assessment of the work-family interface: Validation of the Slovenian versions of work-family conflict and work-family enrichment scales. Psihološka obzorja, 19(3), 53-74.

Van Stolk, L. Staetsky, E., Hassan, E., & Kim, C. V. (2012). Management of psychosocial risks at work: An analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER) . Luxembourg, Luxemourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London, United Kingdom: Methuen.

Prenosi

Objavljeno

24.01.2014

Številka

Rubrika

Znanstveni raziskovalnoempirični članki

Kako citirati

Sedlar, N., Sočan, G., & Šprah, L. (2014). Psihometrične značilnosti slovenske priredbe revidirane verzije generičnega vprašalnika Indeks poklicnega stresa (RG-OSI). Psihološka Obzorja, 22(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.389

Najbolj brani prispevki istega avtorja(jev)

1 2 > >>