Policijska zaslišanja skozi prizmo znanosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.440Ključne besede:
zasliševanja, policija, osumljenci, prisila, preiskovalni intervjuPovzetek
Za pridobivanje informacij od človeških virov se uporablja več pristopov, ki se med seboj razlikujejo v teoretičnih temeljih, ciljih, izvedbi in etični sprejemljivosti. V članku sta kritično predstavljena in primerjana dva prevladujoča pristopa zasliševanj osumljencev, ki ju uporabljajo v policiji. Starejši in prevladujoč zasliševalski pristop je osredotočen na pridobivanje obremenilnih izjav ali priznanj s strani osumljencev, kar nevarno dviguje verjetnost pridobitve izsiljenega priznanja. Zaradi tega se ta pristop imenuje obtožilni ali prisilni, saj osumljence sili k priznanju. Novejši zasliševalski pristop, imenovan preiskovalni intervju, je osredotočen na pridobivanje točnih informacij, s katerimi policija išče dokaze za izločitev ali obdolžitev osumljenca. Verjetnost za obdolžitev in obsodbo nedolžne osebe je tako manjša, saj so osumljenci manj izpostavljeni psihičnim pritiskom. V primerjavi s prisilnim zasliševalskim pristopom je pristop zbiranja informacij etično bolj sprejemljiv, ima znanstvene temelje, omogoča pridobivanje bolj točnih informacij, pri preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj pa je vsaj toliko učinkovit kot prisilni pristop. V preiskovalno intervjuvanje so vgrajena predvsem spoznanja s področja socialne psihologije. Analiza prisilnih zasliševalskih modelov kaže, da so brez znanstveno-teoretičnih temeljev in so tako zasnovani predvsem na nepreverjenih zdravorazumskih domnevah strokovnih avtoritet. V vsesplošno bolj razvitih državah se prisilni model umika modelu zbiranja informacij, kar je povezano s praktičnim uveljavljanjem visokih standardov varovanja človekovih pravic in z ozaveščenostjo strokovne, akademske ter laične javnosti o tveganjih povezanih s prisilnimi zasliševalskimi metodami.Metrike
Prenosi
Literatura
Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., Waring, S., & Christiansen, P. (2014). Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counter interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 170-175. CrossRef
Areh, I. (2011). Forenzična psihologija: Predstavitev, pričanje in ugotavljanje laži [Forensic psychology: Introduction, eyewitness testimony, and detecting lies]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za varnostne vede. CrossRef
Areh, I., Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2015). Police interrogation practice in Slovenia. Psychology, Crime and Law. Advance online publication. CrossRef
Areh, I., Zgaga, S., & Flander, B. (2016). Police interrogation in Slovenia: Selected legal and psychological aspects. In D. Walsh, G. Oxburgh, A. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Vol. 2. Suspects (pp. 204-214). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70. CrossRef
Bond, C. F. & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 214-234. CrossRef
Bond, R. & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137. CrossRef
Brandon, S. E. (2014). Towards a science of interrogation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 945-946. CrossRef
British Psychological Society. (2004). A review of the current scientific status and fields of application of polygraphic deception detection: Final report from the BPS Working Party. Leicester, United Kingdom: Author.
Bull, R. & Soukara, S. (2010). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 81-95). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Buller, D. B., Borland, R., & Burgoon, M. (1998). Impact of behavioural intention on effectiveness of message features: Evidence from the family sun safety project. Human Communication Research, 24, 433-453. CrossRef
Bushman, B. J. (1988). The effects of apparel on compliance: A field experiment with a female authority figure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 459-467. CrossRef
Bushman, B. J. (1998). Effects of warning and information labels on consumption of full-fat, reduced-fat, and no-fat products. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 97-101. CrossRef
Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Influence: Science and practice. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Clarke, C. & Milne, R. (2001). National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course: Police Research Award Scheme. London, United Kingdom: Home Office.
Clarke, C., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision, and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 149-162. CrossRef
Daempfle, P. A. (2014). Good science, bad science, pseudoscience, and just plain bunk: How to tell the difference. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Deslauriers‐Varin, N., Lussier, P., & St‐Yves, M. (2011). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender's decision to confess to the police. Justice Quarterly, 28, 113-145. CrossRef
Dixon, D. (2010). Questioning suspects: A comparative perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 426-440. CrossRef
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 83-88. CrossRef
Fahsing, A. & Rachlew, A. (2012). Investigative interviewing in the Nordic region. In T. Williamson, B. Milne, & S. Savage (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing (pp. 39-65). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Flander, B. (2000). Mednarodni mehanizmi in standardi varstva človekovih pravic: posameznik v mednarodnih sistemih varstva človekovih pravic [International mechanisms and standards of human rights protection: An individual in international systems of human rights protection]. In B. Lobnikar & J. Žurej (Eds.), Raziskovalno delo podiplomskih študentov Slovenije: Družboslovje in humanistika [Reseach work of Slovenian postgraduate students: Social sciences and humanities] (pp. 1-15). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Društvo mladih raziskovalcev Slovenije.
Flander, B. & Meško, G. (2013). Punitivnost in kaznovalni populizem v Sloveniji [Punitivity and penal populism in Slovenia]. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 64, 330-344.
Gallini, B. R. (2010). Police 'Science' in the interrogation room: Seventy years of pseudo-psychological interrogation methods to obtain inadmissible confessions. Hastings Law Journal, 61, 529-580.
Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M. K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 883-897. CrossRef
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook (2nd ed.). Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2009). Interrogations and false confessions among adolescents in seven countries in Europe: What background and psychological factors best discriminate between false confessors and non-false confessors? Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 711-728. CrossRef
Guéguen, N., Pascual, A., & Dagot, L. (2002). Low-ball and compliance to a request: An application in a field setting. Psychological Reports, 91, 81-84. CrossRef
Häkkänen, H., Ask, K., Kebbell, M., Alison, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2009). Police officers' views of effective interview tactics with suspects: The effects of weight of case evidence and discomfort with ambiguity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 468-481. CrossRef
Holmberg, U. & Christianson, S. Å. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 31-45. CrossRef
Holmberg, U. & Madsen, K. (2014). Rapport operationalized as a humanitarian interview in investigative interview settings. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 591-610. CrossRef
Horvath, F., Jayne, B., & Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavior analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793-807. CrossRef
Horvath, F. & Meesig, R. (1996). The criminal investigation process and the role of forensic evidence: A review of empirical findings. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41, 963-969. CrossRef
Huff, R. C. & Killias, M. (2008). Wrongful conviction: Conclusions from an international overview. In R. C. Huff & M. Killias (Eds.), Wrongful conviction: International perspectives on miscarriages of justice (pp. 287-300). Philadelphia, PA, USA: Temple University Press.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2011). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Gaithersberg, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
John E. Reid and Associates, Inc. (n.d.). Company information. Retrieved from http://www.reid.com/r_about.html
Kassin, S. M. (2008a). Confession evidence common-sense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309-1322. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M. (2008b). The psychology of confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 193-217. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M., Appleby, S. C., & Perillo, J. T. (2011). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 39-55. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M. & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M., Kukucka, J., Lawson, V. Z., & DeCarlo, J. (2013). Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 73-83. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A. M., & Fon, D. L. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381-400. CrossRef
Kassin, S. M. & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 67-94). Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage. Retrieved from http://www.williams.edu/Psychology/Faculty/Kassin/files/kassin_wrightsman_1985.pdf
Kebbell, M., Hurren, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2006). An investigation into the effective and ethical interviewing of suspected sex offenders: Final report to the Australian Criminology Research Council.
Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., & Redlich, A. D. (2015). The dynamic nature of interrogation. Law and Human Behavior. Advance online publication. CrossRef
Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 165-178. CrossRef
King, L. & Snook, B. (2009). Peering inside the Canadian interrogation room: An examination of the Reid model of interrogation, influence tactics, and coercive strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 674-694. CrossRef
Leakey, R. & Lewin, R. (1979). People of the Lake: Mankind & its beginnings. Dresden, TN, USA: Avon Books.
Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 266-303. CrossRef
Leo, R. A. (2009). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. Reading, MA, USA: Perseus Books.
Martin, D. L. (2002). The police role in wrongful convictions: An international comparative study. In J. A. Humphrey & S. D. Westervelt (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 77‐95). Brunswick, OH, USA: Rutgers University Press.
Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E., & Barba, A. (2011). Is the behaviour analysis interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 593-604. CrossRef
Meissner, C. A., Hartwig, M., & Russano, M. B. (2010). The need for a positive psychological approach and collaborative effort for improving practice in the interrogation room. Law & Human Behavior, 34, 43-45. CrossRef
Meissner, C. A. & Kassin, S. M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480. CrossRef
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on investigative outcomes. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(13), 1-53.
Milgram, S. (2009). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY, USA: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219-240. CrossRef
Milne, R., Poyser, S., Williamson, T., & Savage, S. (2010). Miscarriages of justice: What can we learn? In J. Adler & J. Gray (Eds.), Forensic Psychology: Concepts, Debates and Practice (pp. 17-36). New York, NY, USA: Willan.
Miron, A. M. & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reaktanz theorie - 40 Jahre spater [Reactance theory - 40 years later]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9-18. CrossRef
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220. CrossRef
Ogloff, J. R. P. & Finkelman, D. (1999). Psychology and law: An overview. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 1- 20). New York, NY, USA: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. CrossRef
Ord, B., Shaw, G., & Green, T. (2011). Investigative interviewing explained (3rd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Butterworths.
Oxburgh, G. E., & Dando C. J. (2011). Psychology and interviewing: What direction now in our quest for reliable information? The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13, 135-144. CrossRef
Quick, B. L. & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34, 448-476. CrossRef
Redlich, A. D., Kelly, C. E., & Miller, J. C. (2014). The who, what, and why of human intelligence gathering: Self-reported measures of interrogation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 817-828. CrossRef
Redlich, A. D. & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Techniques and controversies on the interrogation of suspects: The artful practice versus the scientific study. In J. Skeem, K. Douglas & S. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus (pp. 124-148). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Publications.
Shepherd, E. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 277-284. CrossRef
Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 493-506. CrossRef
Stephenson, G. M. & Moston, S. J. (1993). Attitudes and assumptions of police officers when questioning criminal suspects. Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology, 18, 30-36.
Štirn, M. & Podvršič, I. (2003). Zbiranje obvestil od osumljencev [Gathering information from a suspect]. Unpublished manuscript, Ministry of the Interior, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sullivan, T. P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Chicago, IL, USA: Northwestern University School of Law, Center on Wrongful Convictions.
Sullivan, T. P., Vail, A. W., & Anderson, H. W. (2008). The case for recording police interrogation. Litigation, 34(3), 1-8.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285-293. CrossRef
Vanderhallen, M. & Vervaeke, G. (2014). Between investigator and suspect: The role of working alliance in investigative interviewing. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative Interviewing (pp. 63-90). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 110-130. CrossRef
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Walsh, D. & Bull, R. (2012). How do interviewers attempt to overcome suspects' denials? Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 19, 151-168. CrossRef
Walsh, D. & Bull, R. (2013). The investigation and investigative interviewing of benefit fraud suspects in the UK: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In B. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 33-58). New York, NY, USA: Springer. CrossRef
Walsh, D. & Milne, R. (2007). Perceptions of benefit fraud staff in the UK: Giving P.e.a.c.e. a chance? Public Administration, 85, 525-540. CrossRef
Walsh, D., Redlich, A. Oxburgh, G., & Myklebust, T. (2016). Interview and interrogations of suspects: Obtaining the truth, not just confessions. In D. Walsh, G. Oxburgh, A. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Vol. 2. Suspects (pp. 267-270). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Wedekind, C. & Milinski, M. (2000). Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288, 850-852. CrossRef
White, W. S. & Kamisar, Y. (1981). Police interrogation and confessions: Essays in law and policy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129, 994-1005. CrossRef
Williamson, T., Milne, B., & Savage, S. P. (2009). International developments in investigative interviewing. Cullompton, United Kingdom: Willan Publishing.
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY, USA: Random House.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Kako citirati
