Utemeljena teorija v razvojnopsihološkem raziskovanju
Študija primera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20419/2025.34.614Ključne besede:
kvalitativno raziskovanje, utemeljena teorija, študija primera, YouTuberjiPovzetek
V članku predstavljava dognanja večletnega dela z uporabo utemeljene teorije, ene od metod kvalitativnega razvojnopsihološkega raziskovanja. Utemeljena teorija je kot kvalitativna raziskovalna metoda relativno določena in hkrati nedorečena, saj po eni strani vključuje stroga vodila glede zbiranja podatkov, preverjanja njihove nasičenosti, pravil kodiranja in oblikovanja kategorij na različnih ravneh abstraktnosti, po drugi strani pa je zaradi kvalitativne narave podatkov velik del raziskovalnih odločitev prepuščenih raziskovalcu, ki mora svoje odločitve tekom raziskovalnega dela pregledno dokumentirati in o njih ustrezno poročati. Dileme in dognanja uporabe utemeljene teorije kot raziskovalne metode predstavljava na primeru večletnega raziskovanja vprašanja YouTuberjev kot identifikacijskega modela pri otrocih in mladostnikih, v katerem sva podatke zbirala, kodne strukture pa preverjala s pomočjo intervjujev in fokusnih skupin z otroci, mladostniki in starši. Ugotovitve prinašajo vrsto vsebinskih in metodoloških vpogledov v dileme razvojnopsihološkega raziskovanja s pomočjo utemeljene teorije in odpirajo praktična vprašanja njene nadaljnje uporabe, tudi v kontekstu razvoja novih analitičnih pripomočkov in razvoja modelov umetne inteligence.
Prenosi
Literatura
Balleys, C., Millerand, F., Thoër, C. in Duque, N. (2020). Searching for oneself on youtube: Teenage peer socialization and social recognition processes. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120909474
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.
Battaglia, A., Kerr, G. in Tamminen, K. (2022). A grounded theory of the influences affecting youth sport experiences and withdrawal patterns. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2021.1872732
Biggerstaff, D. (2012). Qualitative research methods in psychology. V G. Rossi (ur.), Psychology – selected papers (str. 175 –206). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/38931
Birks, M. in Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2. izd.). Sage.
Boerman, S. C. in Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2020). Disclosing influencer marketing on YouTube to children: The moderating role of para-social relationship. Frontier in Psychology, 10(3042), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03042
Braun, V. in Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. V H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf in K. J. Sher (ur.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (str. 57– 71). American Psychological Association.
Braun, V. in Clarke, V. (2024). How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of Tong et al.’s (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Methods in Psychology, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2024.100155
Brown, W. J. (2015). Examing four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 15, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12053
Bryant, A. (2014). The grounded theory method. V P. Leavy (ur.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (str. 116–136). Oxford University press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.016
Bryant, A. in Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941
Bryant, A. in Charmaz, K. (2010). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01581-5
Ceci, L. (2023). YouTube: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1287137/youtube-global-users-age-gender-distribution/
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2. izd.). Sage.
Chen, C.-P. (2016). Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(1), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514521081
Chen, J.-L. in Dermawan, A. (2020). The influence of YouTube beauty vloggers on Indonesian consumers' purchase intention of local cosmetic products. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(5), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n5p100
Church, S. P., Dunn, M. in Prokopy, L. S. (2019). Benefits to qualitative data quality with multiple coders: Two case studies in multi-coder data analysis. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 34(1), 1–14. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol34/iss1/2
Corbin, J. in Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3. izd.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K. in Day, R. D. (2014). »Media time = Family time«: Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414538316
Creswell, J. W. in Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124– 130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Das, R. in Hodkinson, P. (2019). Affective coding: Strategies of online steganography in fathers’ mental health disclosure. New Media & Society, 22(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869611
Dawson, P. (2014). Our anonymous online research participants are not always anonymous: Is this a problem? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 428– 437. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12144
De Bérail, P., Guillon, M. in Bungener, C. (2019). The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.007
Demuth, C. in Mey, G. (2015). Qualitative methodology in developmental psychology. V J. Wright (ur.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2. izd., str. 668–675). Elsevier Publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23156-5
Dixon, S. (2023). Media usage in an online minute 2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195140/new-user-generated-content-uploaded-by-users-per-minute/
Dogtiev, A. (2019, 7. januar). YouTube revenue and usage statistics (2018). Business of Apps. http://www.businessofapps.com/data/youtube-statistics/
Domoff, S. E., Radesky, J. S., Harrison, K., Riley, H., Lumeng, J. C. in Miller, A. L. (2018). A naturalistic study of child and family screen media and mobile device use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 408–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1275-1
Dülgerler, M. N. in Bilgin, G. G. (2022). The YouTube effect on adolescence: Exploring the influences on YouTubers on adolescents’ identity construction. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 18(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1127880
Dumas, T. M., Ellis, W. E. in Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Identity development as a buffer of adolescent risk behaviors in the context of peer group pressure and control. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.12.012
Esin, C. (2011). Narrative analysis approaches. V N. Frost (ur.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (str. 92–118). Open University Press.
Evans, C. A., Jordan, A. B. in Horner, J. (2011). Only two hours? A qualitative study of the challenges parents perceive in restricting child television time. Journal of Family Issues, 32(9), 1223–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11400558
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Allen and Unwin.
Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S. in LaGroue, J. (2017). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041
Foley, G. in Timonen, V. (2015). Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Services Research, 50(4), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research in psychology. V N. Frost (ur.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (str. 3–15). Open University Press.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emerge vs. forcing. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. in Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
Glynn Roux, M. D. (2012). Adolescent experience of the effect of watching YouTube videos on sense of self. Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.
GMI Blogger. (2023). YOUTUBE USER STATISTICS 2023. Global Media Insight. https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/#daily
Gomillion, S. C. in Giuliano, T. A. (2011). The influence of media role models on gay, lesbian, and bisexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(3), 330–354. https://doi.org /10.1080/00918369.2011.546729
Harrison, E. in McTavish, M. (2016). »i«Babies: Infants‘ and toddlers‘ emergent language and literacy in a digital culture of iDevices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416653175
Hiniker, A., Sobel, K., Suh, H., Sung, Y. C., Lee, C. P. in Kientz, J. A. (2015). Texting while parenting: How adults use mobile phones while caring for children at the playground. V CHI ‚15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (str. 727–736). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702199
Horton, D. in Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Howitt, D. in Cramer, D. (2011). Introduction to research methods in psychology (3. izd.). Pearson Education Limited.
Hruschka, D. J., Schwarz, D., St. John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R. A. in Carey, J. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16, 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04266540
Khasawneh, A., Madathil, K. C., Dixon, E., Wisniewski, P., Zinzow, H. in Roth, R. (2020). Examining the self-harm and suicide contagion effects of the Blue Whale Challenge on YouTube and Twitter: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mental Health, 7(6), članek e15973. https://doi.org/10.2196/15973
Kobilke, L. in Markiewitz, A. (2021). The Momo Challenge: Measuring the extent to which YouTube portrays harmful and helpful depictions of a suicide game. SN Social Sciences, 1(86), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00065-1
Kunjambu, K. in Muniandy, P. (2013). A content analysis in the studies of YouTube in selected journals. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.301
Ladhari, R., Massa, E. in Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027
Lamiami, G., Borgh, L., Bonazza, F., Rebecchi, D., Lazzari, D. in Vegni, E. (2022). Adjustment processes after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A grounded theory study based on clinical psychologists’ experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, članek 854745. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854745
Lee, R. M. in Fielding, N. G. (2009). Tools for qualitative data analysis. V M. Hardy in A. Bryman (ur.), The handbook of data analysis (str. 529–546). Sage.
Levinson, J. A., Greenfield, P. M. in Signorelli, J. C. (2020). A qualitative analysis of adolescent responses to YouTube videos portraying sexual and gender minority experiences: Belonging, community, and information seeking. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2020.598886
Martinho, M., Pinto, M. in Kuznetsova, Y. (2012). Scholars‘ YouTube channels: Content analysis of aducational videos. Internet Latent Corpus Journal, 2(2), 76–90. http://portal.doc.ua.pt/journals/index.php/ilcj/index
Masaki, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do‘s, don‘ts, and how-to‘s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854
McLachlan, S. (2024). 27 inspiring YouTube stats to know in 2024. https://blog.hootsuite.com/youtube-stats-
marketers/
Morgan, H. E. (2022). How does parenting self-efficacy develop? A grounded theory study of the influences on parents’ feelings and beliefs about themselves in role [Doktorska disertacija, University of Essex]. The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Repository. https://repository.tavistockandportman.ac.uk/2724/1/Morgan%20-%20How.pdf
Neuendorf, K. A. (2019). Content analysis and thematic analysis. V P. Brough (ur.), Research methods for applied psychologists: Design, analysis and reporting (str. 211–223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517971-21
Neumann, M. M. in Herodotou, C. (2020). Young children and YouTube: A global phenomenon. Childhood Education, 96(4), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1796459
Noble, H. in Smith, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A practical example. Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101603
Nolas, S.-M. (2011). Grounded theory approaches. V N. Frost (ur.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches ( str. 1 6–43). O pen University Press.
Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M., Rohrer, J. M., Romero, F., Scheel, A. M., Scherer, L. D., Schönbrodt, F. D. in Vazire, S. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
O‘Connor, C. in Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Dabates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069198992
Parsonage, J., Lund, K. N., Dawes, H., Almoajil, H. in Eklund, M. (2022). An exploration of occupational choices in adolescence: A constructivist grounded theory study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 29(6), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1839965
Patrick, P. M., Reupert, A. E. in McLean, L. A. (2020). Relational trajectories in families with parental mental illness: A grounded theory approach. BMC Psychology, 8(68), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00432-2
Pelchen, L. (2024). Internet usage statistics in 2024. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/home-improvement/internet/internet-statistics/#:~:text=There%20are%205.35%20billion%20internet%20users%20worldwide.&text=Out%20of %20the%20nearly%208,the%20internet%2C%20according%20to%20Statista
Pidgeon, N. in Henwood, K. (2009). Grounded theory. V M. Hardy in A. Bryman (ur.), The handbook of data analysis ( str. 6 25–648). S age. h ttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608184.n28
Plowman, L., Stephen, C., Stevenson, O. in McPake, J. (2012). Preschool children's learning with teachnology at home. Computers & Education, 59(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.014?
Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. V M. Hardy in A. Bryman (ur.), Handbook of data analysis (str. 607–624). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608184.n27
Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyin, M. in Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
Rihl, A. in Weger, C. (2017). YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485651773697
Rush, S. C. (2014). Transana qualitative video and audio analysis software as a tool for teaching intellectual assessment skills to graduate psychology students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 55– 74. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.43.1.e
Ryan, L. in D‘Angelo, A. (2018). Changing times: Migrants’ social network analysis and the challenges of longitudinal research. Social Networks, 53, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.003
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2. izd.). Sage.
Sangeorzan, I., Andriopoulou, P. in Livanou, M. (2019). Exploring the experiences of people vlogging about severe mental illness on YouTube: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.119
Sedmak, A. (2019). YouTuberji kot identifikacijski modeli pri mladostnikih [YouTubers as identification models for adolescents] [Magistrsko delo, Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta]. Repozitorij UL. https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=108682&lang=slv
Sedmak, A. in Svetina, M. (2023). Components of adolescents‘ attraction with YouTubers. Current Psychology, 43, 6167–6179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04784-x
Shinebourne, P. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. V N. Frost (ur.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (str. 44–65). Open University Press.
Smith, B. in Sparkes, A. C. (2020). Qualitative research. V G. Tenenbaum in R. C. Eklund (ur.), Handbook of sport psychology: Vol. II (str. 1001–1019). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch49
Smith, J. A. in Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. V J. A. Smith (ur.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (str. 51–80). Sage.
Software Development. (2021). Transkriptor [aplikacija]. https://transkriptor.com
Sosa-Díaz, M.-J. in Valverde-Berrocoso, J. (2022). Grounded theory as a research methodology in education technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221133228
Soto, C. J. in John, O. (2016). The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Stough, L. M. in Lee, S. (2021). Grounded theory approaches used in educational research journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Strauss, A. in Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Strauss, A. in Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.
Sudarsan, I., Hoare, K., Sheridan, N. in Roberts, J. (2022). Giving voice to children in research: The power of child-centered constructivist grounded theory methodology. Research in Nursing and Health, 45(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22231
Teubner, T., Flath, C. M., Weinhardt, C., van der Aalst, W. in Hinz, O. (2023). Welcome to the era of ChatGPT et al. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 65, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x
Tolbert, A. N. in Drogos, K. L. (2019). Tweens‘ wishful identification and parasocial relationships with YouTubers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02781
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. in Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Vera, J. C., García, A. R., Miranda, G. R. in Martínez, A. R. (2019). Measuring critical reception in kids through consumption of risky challenges videos in YouTube. V C. Stephanidis (ur.), HCI International 2019 – Posters: 21st International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019, Proceedings, Part I (str. 331–338). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23522-2_43
Ward, K., Gott, M. in Hoare, K. (2017). Analysis in grounded theory — How is it done? Examples from a study that explored living with treatment for sleep apnea. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473989245
Westenberg, W. (2016). The influence of YouTubers on teenagers: A descriptive research about the role YouTubers play in the life of their teenage viewers [Master Thesis, University of Twente]. University of Twente student theses. https://essay.utwente.nl/71094/1/Westenberg_MA_BMS.pdf
Whelan, T. J. (2007). Anonymity and confidentiality: Do survey respondents know the difference? [predstavitev na konferenci]. 30th Annual Meeting of the Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists, Durham, NC. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242075924_ A nony m it y _ a nd _Con f ident ialit y _ Do_ Su r vey _ Respondents_Know_the_Difference
Xu, Y., Abeele, M. V., Hou, M. in Antheunis, M. (2022). Do parasocial relationships with micro- and mainstream celebrities differ? An empirical study testing four attributes of the parasocial relationship. Celebrity Studies, 14(3), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2021.2006730
Yu, M. in Smith, S. M. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for a new generation of researchers. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473989245
Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., de Ferrerre, E. in Van Looy, J. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children‘s digital media use at home. Journal of Breadcasting and Electronic Media, 60(1), 1–22. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240
Zimmermann, D., Noll, C., Gräßer, L., Hugger, K.-U., Braun, L. M., Nowak, T. in Kaspar, K. (2020). Influencers on YouTube: A quantitative study on young people’s use and perception of videos about political and societal topics. Current Psychology, 41, 6808–6824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01164-7
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Ana Sedmak, Matija Svetina
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Kako citirati
