The task as the central unit of planning and instruction in the EAP syllabus design

Marijana Birtić Vučić; Anamarija Štulina

doi:10.4312/sm.19.2.56-68

Authors

Marijana Birtić Vučić Centre for Foreign Languages, University of Zadar Author
Anamarija Štulina Centre for Foreign Languages, University of Zadar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/sm.19.2.56-68

Keywords:

task, task-based language teaching (TBLT), English for Academic Purposes (EAP), syllabus design

Abstract

Informed by the knowledge, practical experience and challenges encountered during designing syllabi for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) 1 and 2 courses, this teaching report outlines the design of the syllabi for the continuing EAP 3 and EAP 4 courses. Targeted at second-year undergraduate students in the Humanities and Social Sciences programmes at the University of Zadar, Croatia, these courses necessitate tailored approaches to language instruction that address students' specific academic needs. The needs-based approach to the design process aimed to facilitate students' overall communicative competence, address their reluctance towards oral participation, and foster proficiency in academic language skills relevant to their disciplines. To achieve these objectives, the syllabi integrate the principles of task-based language teaching (TBLT), specifically utilizing tasks as the central unit for planning and instruction. Task selection and design emphasized real-world academic scenarios, ensuring the chosen tasks reflect authentic language use that students will encounter in their studies. By incorporating TBLT principles, this report offers a framework for enhancing language learning in EAP courses. This framework promotes authentic language use and ultimately supports students' academic success within their chosen fields. Pedagogical implications include the utilization of TBLT principles to tailor language instruction for EAP courses, focusing on academic scenarios to enhance students' communicative competence and academic language proficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00024-2

Basturkmen, H. (2016). Dialogic interaction. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, (pp. 152–164). Routledge.

Behar-Horenstein, L.S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554

Bhowmik, S.K., Hilman, B., & Roy, S. (2019). Peer collaborative writing in the EAP classroom: Insights from a Canadian postsecondary context, TESOL Journal,10(2), 1–16.

Birtić Vučić, M., & Štulina, A. (2011). Developing communication skills through in-class debating, Strani jezici: časopis za primijenjenu lingvistiku, 40(3), 237–245.

Birtić Vučić, M., & Štulina, A. (2020). Challenges in syllabus design for ESP courses I / II (for students of humanities and social sciences at the university of Zadar). Zbornik radova Veleučilišta u Šibeniku, 14(1-2), 197–205.

Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp. 1–20). Pearson Education Limited.

Choice Media. (2023, 2 November). Episode 230: Primary source literacy and the impact of digitization [Audio podcast episode]. In The Authority File. Choice360. https://www.choice360.org/podcasts/episode-230/

Cunningham, C. (2014). ‘Keep talking’: Using music during small group discussions in EAP. ELT Journal, 68(2),179–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct097

Davies, M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on critical thinking in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.562145

East, M. (2017). Research into practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 50(3), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481700009X

Ellis, R. (2003a). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003b). Designing a task-based syllabus. RELC Journal, 34(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400105

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 221–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x

Ellis, R. (2013). Task-based language teaching: Responding to the critics. TESOL, 8, 1–27.

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (1st ed.). Routledge.

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Lane, R. (2007). Improving the critical thinking skills of students in geography. The Social Educator, 25(1), 29–38.

Liu, C-Y. (2023). Podcasts as a resource for learning academic English: A lexical perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 71, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.02.003

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.

Majidi, Ab el., Janssen, D., & Graaff, Rick de. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. Systems, 101, 102576, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576

Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.05.002

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2010). A task-based approach to materials development. Advancement in Language and Literacy Studies, 1(2), 135–160. https://doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.1n.2p.135

Prabhu, N. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Rafique R. (2019). Using podcasts to improve listening skills of tertiary level learners: Insights from literature. The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics, 11(21–22), 117–131.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2010). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, B. (2017). Student-produced podcasts in language learning – Exploring student perceptions of podcast activities. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.3.08

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based learning. Applied Linguistics, 17 (1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38

Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14.

Stoller, F. (2001). The curriculum renewal process in English for academic purposes programmes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes (pp.208–224). Cambridge University Press.

Thomson, P. (2023, March 27). AI and all that jazz. Patter. https://patthomson.net/2023/03/27/ai-and-all-that-jazz/

Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based Language Education: From Theory to Practice (pp.1–16). Cambridge University Press.

Vuković-Stamatović, M. (2022). Suitability of science & technology documentaries for EAP and EST listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101137

Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Longman.

Ye, Y. (2021). From abstracts to “60-second science” podcasts: Reformulation of scientific discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101025

Želježić, M. (2017). Debate in the EFL Classroom. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 14(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.14.1.39–54.