WOMEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS ROUTINE COMPOSITION AT RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES

A TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF BALANCE BEAM AND FLOOR EXERCISE ROUTINES

Authors

  • Mateus Henrique de Oliveira School of Physical Education, UNICAMP São Paulo/Brazil
  • Leticia Bartholomeu de Queiroz Lima Univerity Center Hermínio Ometto – UNIARARAS; Brasil
  • Andrize Ramires Costa Federal University of Pelotas, UFPel, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.14.1.17-28

Keywords:

Routine composition, Code of Points, Olympic Games

Abstract

Artistic gymnastics is a sport comprising a variety of movements performed on apparatus, connected by the art of movement. The Code of Points is a document that brings together all the rules of this sport; it guides the work of coaches and gymnasts, helping to compose the routines presented in competitions. This study focuses on women's artistic gymnastics and the implementation of its rules, established by the Code of Points 2013-2016. It aims to analyze the elements that composed the gymnasts' routines during the last Olympic Games (Rio 2016) and identify the possible technical relations between the composition of the balance beam and the floor exercises in line with the current Code. For this purpose, we carried out a video analysis of 82 balance beam routines and 82 floor exercise routines, in total 164 routines performed by athletes competing in women's artistic gymnastics at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games qualifying competition. We observed that the Code of Points is still little explored, and gymnasts use only a few of the elements available. In this sense, the International Gymnastics Federation and, more specifically, the Code of Points, which regulates the sport, should devise strategies for better usage of the elements available within the stipulated rules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkaev, L., & Suchilin, N. G. (2004). Gymnastics: how to create champions. Meyer & Meyer Verlag.

Atiković, A., & Kamenjašević, E. (2021). The prediction of All-Around event final score based on D and E score factors in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 13(1), 47-146.

Bortoleto, M. A. C. (2018). Advanced Applied Example of Motor Control 3: The Impact of Elastic Technologies on Artistic Gymnastics - A Special Case Study From Brazil. In: Jemni, M. (Ed.). (2017). The science of gymnastics: advanced concepts. Routledge, 266-277.

Čuk, I. (2016). Do Code of Points in men artistic gymnastics and women artistic gymnastics favor asymmetric elements? Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 30(1), 9-18.

Cuk, I., & Forbes, W. (2010). How apparatus difficulty scores affect all around results in men’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 3(2), 53–67.

Donti, O., Donti, A., & Theodorakou, K. (2014). A review on the changes of the evaluation system affecting artistic gymnasts’ basic preparation: The aspect of choreography preparation. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 6(2), 63-72.

Erceg, T., Delaš Kalinski, S., & Milić, M. (2014). The score differences between elite europen junior and senior women gymnasts. Kinesiology, 46(Supplement 1), 88-94.

Federation Internationale de Gymnastique. (2013). 2013-2016 Code of Points. Updated June 2015.

Federation Internationale de Gymnastique. (2017). 2017-2020 Code of Points. Updated March 2017.

Ferreirinha, J., & Barata, P. (2009) Mudanças necessárias na prática das modalidades de Ginástica de Competição. Revista ENGym, (2),4-5; Available in https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose-Ferreirinha/publication/259183948_Mudancas_necessarias_na_pratica_das_modalidades_de_Ginastica_de_Competicao/links/02e7e52a370a0b223c000000/Mudancas-necessarias-na-pratica-das-modalidades-de-Ginastica-de-Competicao.pdf

Grossfeld, A. (2014). Changes during the 110 years of the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 6(2), 5-27.

Kalinski, S. D., Božanić, A., & Atiković, A. (2011). Influence of dance elements on balance beam results. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 3(2),39-45.

Kalinski, S. D., Kezić, A., & Penjak, A. (2021). Trends in Beam Exercise Structures of Artistic Gymnastics through five Olympic Cycles. In 9th International Scientific Conference of Kinesiology (p. 748).

Kerr, R., & Obel, C. (2015). The disappearance of the perfect 10: Evaluating rule changes in women's artistic gymnastics. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(2), 318-331. DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2014.974031

Kezić, A., Kalinski, S. D., & Penjak, A. Top level floor routines structure at the Olympic Games: The impact of acrobatic and dance elements. In 9th International Scientific Conference of Kinesiology (p. 771).

Nunomura, M., Carrara, P. D. S., & Tsukamoto, M. H. C. (2010). Ginástica artística e especialização precoce: cedo demais para especializar, tarde demais para ser campeão! Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 24(3), 305-314.

Nunomura, M., Kerr, R., Cervin, G., Schubring, A., & Barker-Ruchti, N. (2019). The Code of Points and the career development in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 11(1), 5-14.

Oliveira, M. S., & Bortoleto, M. A. C. (2009). O código de pontuação da ginástica artística masculina ao longo dos tempos. Journal of Physical Education, 20(1), 97-107.

Oliveira, M. S., Pires, F. R., Roble, O., Molinari, C. I. & Nunomura, M. (2017). A compreensão e a avaliação do componente artístico da ginástica artística. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 31(10), 41-50.

Pastor, F. S., Ares, M. X., & García, J. C. (2003). Gimnasia artística: los fundamentos de la técnica. Biblioteca Nueva.

Pajek, M. B., Čuk, I., Pajek, J., Kovač, M., & Leskošek, B. (2013). Is the quality of judging in women artistic gymnastics equivalent at major competitions of different levels?. Journal of human kinetics, 37, 173-181.

Pajek, M. B., Kovač, M., Pajek, J., & Leskošek, B. (2014). The Judging of artistry components in female gymnastics: a cause for concern. Science of gymnastics journal, 6(3), 5-12.

Pajek, M. B. (2015). Judging Artistry on Balance Beam. In 2nd International Scientific Slovenian Gymnastics Federation (p. 87).

Penafria, M. (2009, April). Análise de Filmes-conceitos e metodologia (s). In VI Congresso Sopcom (Vol. 6, pp. 6-7). Available in http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/bocc-penafria-analise.pdf. Acess in: 30 abr. 2020.

Pizzol, V., Oliveira, M. H. & Toledo, E. (2017). On stage the artistic component of athletes from Women's Artistic Gymnastics at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 31(10), 90.

Robin, J. F. & Santos, S. B. (2014) Ginástica: um jogo de regras. In. Schiavon, L. M., Heinen, T., Bortoleto, M. A. C., Nunomura, M., & De Toledo, E. (Eds.). (2014). High performance gymnastics. Arete-Verlag.

Sarsfield, R. (1959). Physical and Artistic Expression in Gymnastics. Physical Educator, 16(1), 1-14.

Seemann-Sinn, A., Brehmer, S., Naundorf, F., & Wolfarth, B. (2021). Development of the routine duration in artistic gymnastics from 1997 to 2019. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 21(2), 250-262.

Sterkowicz-Przybycien, K. (2004). A comparative analysis of the results obtained at the Olympic Games in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics, 1988–2000. Human, 48.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Oliveira, M. H. de, Queiroz Lima, L. B. de, & Costa, A. R. (2022). WOMEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS ROUTINE COMPOSITION AT RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES: A TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF BALANCE BEAM AND FLOOR EXERCISE ROUTINES. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 14(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.14.1.17-28

Issue

Section

Articles