AESTHETIC RATIOS OF FLIGHT - HOW OBSERVER EXPERTISE AND AESTHETIC PERCEPTION ARE RELATED TO WEBSTER FREERUNNING SKILL FLIGHT KINEMATICS
Keywords:empirical aesthetics, motion perception, Likert-scale, golden ratio, videography
The perception of (motion) aesthetics is related to the circumstances of the object, the observer, and the given context. The central question of this study is whether the perception of motion aesthetics is related to a motor skill’s ratio of flight kinematics and the observer’s sensory-motor experiences. Motor skills, perceived as more aesthetic, are hypothesized to show kinematic flight ratios near the golden ratio. Motor skills, perceived as less aesthetic, are hypothesized to show kinematic flight ratios farther away from the golden ratio. Furthermore, this relationship is hypothesized to be related to the observer’s sensory-motor experience. Therefore, 36 participants (12 freerunning experts, 12 freerunning novices, and 12 laypeople) were asked to indicate their perception of motion aesthetics when watching video sequences of different freerunning performances. The results indicate that kinematic flight ratios and the observer’s sensory-motor experience are related to the aesthetic perception of the freerunning skill. As hypothesized, kinematic ratios of Webster performances perceived as more aesthetic are closer to the golden ratio, and Webster performances perceived as less aesthetic are farther away from the golden ratio; this is significant for expert and novice freerunners, but not for laypeople. Thus, we conclude that the aesthetic perception of complex motor skills is related to kinematic flight ratios and the observer’s sensory-motor expertise. Future work should incorporate such knowledge about kinematic ratios and how to address them during motor skill performances to create and perform aesthetically pleasing complex motor skills.
Bar-Eli, M., Plessner, H., & Raab, M. (2011). Judgement, decision making and success in sport. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119977032
Bronner, S., & Shippen, J. (2015). Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance. Experimental Brain Research, 233(12), 3565–3581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4
Christensen, J. F., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2013). Dance as a subject for empirical aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031827
Daprati, E., Iosa, M., & Haggard, P. (2009). A dance to the music of time: Aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e5023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005023
Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE, 2(11), e1201.
Enoka, R. M. (2015). Neuromechanics of human movement (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492595632
Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG). (2016). 2017-2020 Code of points. Women’s Artistic Gymnastics. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_WAG%20CoP%202017-2020.pdf
Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG). (2019). 2019-2021 Code of points. Parkour. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_PK%20Code%20of%20Points%202019-2021.pdf
Iosa, M., Morone, G., & Paolucci, S. (2018). Phi in physiology, psychology and biomechanics: The golden ratio between myth and science. Biosystems, 165, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.01.001
Iosa, M., De Bartolo, D., Morone, G., Boffi, T., Mammucari, E. Vannozzi, G., Bini, F., Marinozzi, F., Antonucci, G., & Paolucci, S. (2019). Gait phase proportions in different locomotion tasks: The pivot role of golden ratio. Neuroscience Letters, 699, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.052
Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Köhler, M., & Schröger, E. (2004). The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports, 94, 1253-1260. https://doi.org/10.2466%2Fpr0.94.3c.1253-1260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1253-1260
Kirsch, L., Drommelschmidt, K., & Cross, E. (2013). The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521
Kirsch, L. P., Urgesi, C., & Cross, E. S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005
Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
Livio, M. (2003). The golden ratio: The story of phi, the world’s most astonishing number. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
Newlove, J., & Dalby, J. (2004). Laban for all. London, UK: Routledge.
Orgs, G., Calvo-Merino, B., & Cross, E. S. (2018). Knowing dance or knowing how to dance? In B. Bläsing, M. Puttke, & T. Schack (Eds.), The neurocognition of dance (2nd ed., pp. 238-257). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726410-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726410-13
Orlandi, A., Cross, E., & Orgs, G. (2020). Timing is everything: Dance aesthetics depend on the complexity of movement kinematics. Cognition, 205, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104446
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 77-107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21(3), 80-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Tinio, P. T. L., & Leder, H. (2009). Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica, 130(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001
Torrents, C., Castañer, M., Jofre, T., Morey, G., & Reverter, F. (2013). Kinematic parameters that influence the aesthetic perception of beauty in contemporary dance. Perception, 42(4), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/p7117
Torrents, C., Castañer, M., Reverter, F., Morey, G., & Jofre, T. (2015). Dance teachers’ aesthetic perception of kinematic parameters. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 442-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039757
Vinken, P. M., & Heinen, T. (2020). Perceived aesthetic features differentiating between complex artistic dance skills of varying style. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 12(2), 119-134.
Vinken, P. M., Stirling, V., & Heinen, T. (in press). The aesthetics of the experts - On the relationship of observer’s and performer’s expertise when perceiving motion aesthetics in freerunning skills. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2022, 17(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.174.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.174.06
Zamparo, P., Carrara, S., & Cesari, P. (2017). Movement evaluation of front crawl swimming: technical skill versus aesthetic quality. PLoS One, 12(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184171