PERCEIVED AESTHETIC FEATURES DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN COMPLEX ARTISTIC DANCE SKILLS OF VARYING STYLE

Authors

  • Pia M. Vinken Institute of Sport Science, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  • Thomas Heinen Faculty of Sport Science, Leipzig University, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.12.2.119-133

Keywords:

artistic sports, stick-figure video sequences, two-alternative forced choice task, motion perception, performing arts

Abstract

Research on (empirical) aesthetics investigates properties and features of objects, the resulting response-mechanisms to such objects in the observer, and the interplay between factors of the object and the observer in a given context. This study focuses on object-related factors, such as biological motion. The question is addressed of whether there are perceived aesthetic features differentiating between complex artistic skills ranked most and least aesthetic by experienced observers. Therefore, 18 participants with dance experience were asked to evaluate the perceived aesthetics of stick-figure video sequences of three different complex motor skills, namely dance jumps, poses, and turns. As a result, three specific aesthetic features are pointed out as aesthetic fundamentals in the perception and evaluation of aesthetic sports and performing arts: 1) an outwards direction away from the dancers longitudinal axis and body center, 2) a focus on external rotation of the limbs (turn-out), and 3) a (diagonal) spread of body movements creating the impression of elongating the dancer’s body. In particular, aesthetic features that demand the performer’s ability and challenge physical laws seem to be robust parameters when aiming to create aesthetic motion stimuli. Concluding, a skill-specificity for aesthetic features, as well as the need to differentiate between the interaction of different aesthetic features, is pointed out – aspects which seem especially apparent in biological motion stimuli.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkaev, L., & Suchilin, N. (2009). Gymnastics: how to create champions. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.

Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2018). Aesthetics. Current Biology, 28(16), 859-863.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.004

Burrows, J. (2010). A choreographer’s handbook. Taylor & Francis.

Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E., & Haggard, P. (2008). Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 911-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003

Castañer, M., Torrents, C., Morey, G., & Jofre, T. (2014). Appraising choreographic creativity, aesthetics, and the complexity of motor responses in dance. In O. Camerino, M. Castañer, & M. T. Anguera (Eds.), Mixed methods in the movement sciences (pp. 146-175). London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203132326

Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003

Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21-30). Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.002

Christensen, J. F., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2013). Dance as a subject for empirical aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031827

Christensen, J. F., Nadal, M., Cela-Conde, C. M., & Gomila, A. (2014). A norming study and library of 203 dance movements. Perception, 43, 178-206. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7581

Cross, E. (2015). Beautiful embodiment: the shaping of aesthetic preference by personal experience. In J. P. Huston, M. Nadal, F. Mora, L. F. Agnati, C. Jose Cela Conde (Eds.), Art, aesthetics, and the brain (pp. 189-208). Oxford University Press.

Čuk, I., Fink, H., & Leskošek, B. (2012). Modeling the final score in artistic gymnastics by different weights of difficulty and execution. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 4(1), 73-82.

Daprati, E., Iosa, M., & Haggard, P. (2009). A dance to the music of time: aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS ONE, 4(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005023

FIG (2016). 2017 – 2020 Code of points – women’s artistic gymnastics. Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique. http://www.fig-gymnastics.com/publicdir/rules/files/en_WAG%20CoP%202017-2020.pdf

Findlay, L. C., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2004). A reputation bias in figure skating judging. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 154-166.

https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.1.154

Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences. A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155

Kirsch, L. P., Dawson, K., & Cross, E. S. (2015). Dance experience sculpts aesthetic perception and related brain circuits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12634

Laban, R. (2011). The mastery of movement. Dance Books Ltd.

Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: the aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 443-464.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084

Mack, M., Hennig, L., & Heinen, T. (2018). Movement prototypes in the performance of the handspring on vault. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10(2), 245-257.

Orgs, G., Calvo-Merino, B., & Cross, E. (2018). Knowing dance or knowing how to dance? Sources of expertise in aesthetic appreciation of human movement. In B. Bläsing, M. Puttke, & T. Schack (Eds.). The neurocognition of dance (pp. 238-256). London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726410

Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77-107.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504

Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 265-279.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2009). Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica, 130, 241-250.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001

Torrents, C., Castañer, M., Jofre, T., Morey, G., & Reverter, F. (2013). Kinematic parameters that influence the aesthetic perception of beauty in contemporary dance. Perception, 42, 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7117

Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2, 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.5.2

Watkins, J. (2014). Fundamental biomechanics of sport and exercise. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PERCEIVED AESTHETIC FEATURES DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN COMPLEX ARTISTIC DANCE SKILLS OF VARYING STYLE. (2020). Science of Gymnastics Journal, 12(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.12.2.119-133

Similar Articles

1-10 of 153

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.