INDIVIDUAL APPARATUS RESULTS OF FEMALE ALL AROUND OLYMPIC CHAMPIONS

Authors

  • Maja Pajek University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.10.3.357-368

Keywords:

history, artistic gymnastics, development

Abstract

The changes of Code of Points stimulate the rise in exercise difficulty and a drive towards increased specialization of gymnasts. We inspected the performance of all-around medalists at individual apparatus finals to analyze the trends in their efficiency to reach the podium. Data from Olympic games 1952-2016 was included in this retrospective study. In the period form 1952-1984 there were 5 occasions when all-round winners reached 75 to 100% efficiency in reaching the podium at all individual apparatus finals. However overall, there is a clear trend of diminished efficiency of all-around winners to reach the podium at individual finals in the observed period (1952-2016) from the average of 7.7 medals in the first three observed events to 4.3 medals at the last three observed events. Olympic all-around champion efficiency was calculated from sum of all medals won by all-around champions on apparatuses divided by 4. This efficiency has decreased from 91.7% in the first three events to 41.7% in the last three events. In recent events all-around champions still managed to win at least one medal on single apparatuses as there was only one exception to this rule at 2012. It is very much probable that in the future all-around champions will excel further at single apparatus finals; however a huge predominance of all-around champions at apparatus finals cannot be expected any more.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkaev, L.I., & Suchilin, N.G. (2004). How to Create Champions. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport.

Atiković, A., Delaš Kalinski, S., & Smajlović, S. (2017). Historical analysis of the chronological age trend of the participants of men’s artistic gymnastics who have won medals in the period between 1896 and 2016. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(1), 233-239.

Atiković, A., Delaš Kalinski, S., & Čuk, I. (2017). Age trends in artistic gymnastic across world championships and the olympic games from 2003 to 2016. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9(3), 251-263.

Bučar Pajek, M., Čuk, I., Pajek, J., Kovač, M., & Leskošek, B. (2013). Is the quality of judging in women artistic gymnastics equivalent at major competitions of different levels? Journal of Human Kinetics, 37(1), 173-181.

Bučar Pajek, M., Forbes, W., Pajek, J., Leskošek, B., & Čuk, I. (2011). Reliability of Real Time Judging System (RTJS). Science of Gymnastics Journal, 3(2), 47–54.

Bučar, M. (1998). Primerjalna analiza tekmovalnih pravil v moški in ženski športni gimnastik Comparative analysis of Code of points in men's and women's artistic gymnastics). Bachelor thesis, Ljubljana: Faculty of sport.

Bučar, M., Čuk, I., Pajek, J., Karácsony, I., & Leskošek, B. (2012). Reliability and validity of judging in women’s artistic gymnastics at the University Games 2009. European Journal of Sport Science, 12(3), 207-215.

Čuk, I., & Atiković, A. (2009), Are Disciplines in All-around Men’s Artistic Gymnastics Equal? Sport Scientific & Practical Aspects, 6(1&2), 8-13.

Čuk, I., & Forbes, W. (2010), How apparatus difficulty scores affect all around results in men’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(3), 57-63.

Delaš Kalinski, S., Atiković, A., Jelaska, I., & Milić, M. (2016). Performance analysis of female gymnasts’ vault in elite competitions from 2008-2015. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 8(2), 109-123.

Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

FIG. (2006). Code of Points – Artistic Gymnastics for Women. Lausanne: FIG.

Fink., H. & Hofmann, D. (2015). Age group development and competition program for Men’s Artistic Gymnastics. Federation Internationale de Gymnastique FIG May 2015 http://www.fig-docs.com/website/agegroup/manuals/Agegroup-mag-manual-e.pdf (Accessed 9 May 2017).

Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers- The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Gymnastics results. Retrived from: http://www.gymnasticsresults.com (Accessed 10 October 2017).

GymnasticsResultsCom. Gymnastics Results, 2017. Available atRetrieved 10 October, 2017 from: http://www.gymnasticsresults.com.; Accessed on 07.01.2012

Topends sports (2018). Olympic Games Boycotts and Political Events. Retrieved 29 January, 2018 from: http://www.topendsports.com/events/summer/boycotts.htm.

Wallechinsky, D. & Loucky, J. (2012). The Complete Book of the Olympics. London: Aurum Press.

Wikipedia (2018). List of Olympic Games boycotts. Retrieved 29 January, 2018 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_Games_boycotts .

Zurc, J. (2017). It was worth it– i would do it again!: phenomenological perspectives on life in the elite women’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9(1), 41-59.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pajek, M. (2018). INDIVIDUAL APPARATUS RESULTS OF FEMALE ALL AROUND OLYMPIC CHAMPIONS. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10(3), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.10.3.357-368

Similar Articles

1-10 of 179

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.