MOVEMENT REGULATION IN DISMOUNTS ON THE BALANCE BEAM

Authors

  • Thomas Heinen
  • Jannis Frackmann
  • Alina Müller
  • Vanessa Zöllner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.16.2.169-179

Keywords:

perception-action coupling, environmental constraints, handspring, round-off

Abstract

In artistic gymnastics, the apparatus structure is considered an essential constraint in regulating gymnastic skill performance under an operating coupling between perception and action. The question arises of how such regulation processes generalize within gymnastic skills with a similar movement goal but a different structure. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze how a particular environmental constraint (i.e., space available on the balance beam) regulates gymnasts’ performance in skills with a similar movement goal but a different movement structure. Female gymnasts were asked to perform the round-off and the handspring as dismounts on the balance beam in two conditions (baseline vs. reduced space available). Gymnasts exhibited differences in foot positioning between experimental conditions. For both skills, the most significant part of regulation occurred between the starting point and the first step, and a small part of regulation occurred between the first step and the placement of the hands. While for the round-off, another small part of regulation also occurred between the placement of the second hand and landing on the mat, there was virtually no regulation between the placement of the hands and landing on the mat in the handspring. It is concluded that, for gymnasts, adapting to varying constraints from trial to trial can be seen as an essential skill. Implementing these constraints into practice schedules may help develop a broad range of regulation strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkaev, L. I., & Suchilin, N. G. (2004). Gymnastics. How to create champions. Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.

Bardy, B. G., & Laurent, M. (1998). How is body orientation controlled during somersaulting? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.963

Bradshaw, E. J., & Sparrow, W. A. (2001). Effects of approach velocity and foot-target characteristics on the visual regulation of step length. Human Movement Science, 20(4–5), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00060-4

Bradshaw, E. J. (2004). Target-directed running in gymnastics: a preliminary exploration of vaulting. Sports Biomechanics, 3(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140408522834

Bradshaw, E., Hume, P., Calton, M., & Aisbett, B. (2010). Reliability and variability of day-to-day vault training measures in artistic gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics, 9(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2010.488298

DTB (2023). Arbeitshilfen für Trainer*innen, Übungsleiter*innen, Kampfrichter*innen. Kür modifiziert - LK 1 bis 4 Gerätturnen weiblich [Working aids for coaches, trainers, judges. Modified freestyle – LK 1 to 4 gymnastics female]. https://www.dtb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dtb.de/Sportarten/Gerätturnen/PDFs/2023/01_DTB-Arbeitshilfe_Gtw_KuerMod_2023_V1_01.pdf?v1=2023

Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovic, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.002

Cornus, S., Laurent, M., & Laborie, S. (2009). Perception-movement coupling in the regulation of step lengths when approaching an obstacle. Ecological Psychology, 21(4), 334–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410903320991

Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Glazier, P. (2005). Movement models from sports reveal fundamental insights into coordination processes. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 33(1), 36–42.

Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition. A constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.

Davlin, C. D., Sands, W. A., & Shultz, B. B. (2001). The role of vision in control of orientation in a back tuck somersault. Motor Control, 5, 337–346. https://doi.org/doi:10.1123/mcj.5.4.337

Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40(1), 79–107.

Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique [FIG] (2022a). 2022-2024 Code of points. Women’s artistic gymnastics. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_2022-2024%20WAG%20COP.pdf

Federation Internationale de Gymnastique [FIG] (2022b). FIG apparatus norms. Edition 2022. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_Apparatus%20Norms.pdf

Geiblinger, H., & Dowden, T. (2015). Considerations for controlled competition landings in gymnastics: aggregated opinions of experts. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 7(3), 47–58.

Heinen, T. (2017). Movement regulation of gymnastics skills under varying environmental constraints. European Journal of Human Movement, 39, 96–115.

Heinen, T., Artmann, I., Brinker, A., & Nicolaus, M. (2015). Task dependency of movement regulation in female gymnastic vaulting. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 7(4), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.07.4.06

Heinen, T., Brinker, A., Mack, M., & Hennig, L. (2017). The role of positional environmental cues in movement regulation of Yurchenko vaults in gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9(2), 113–126.

Heinen, T., Jeraj, D., Thoeren, M., & Vinken, P. M. (2011). Target-directed running in gymnastics: the role of the springboard position as an informational source to regulate handsprings on vault. Biology of Sport, 28(4), 215–221.

Hiley, M. J., Zuevsky, V. V., & Yeadon, M. R. (2013). Is skilled technique characterized by high or low variability? An analysis of high bar giant circles. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.007

Hiley, M., Yeadon, M. R. (2015). Optimal technique, variability and control in gymnastics. In K. Kanosue, T. Nagami, & J. Tsuchiya (Eds.), Sports Performance (pp. 293–304). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55315-1_23

Knudson, D. (2009). Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomechanics, 8(1), 96–104. https://doi:10.1080/14763140802629966

Larsen, R. J., Jackson, W. H., & Schmitt, D. (2016). Mechanisms for regulating step length while running towards and over an obstacle. Human Movement Science, 49, 186–195. https://doi:10.1016/j.humov.2016.07.002

Latash, M. L. (2008). Neurophysiological basis of movement (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.

Lee, D. N., Lishman, J. R., & Thomson, J. A. (1982). Regulation of gait in long jumping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(3), 448–459. https://doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.3.448

Mester, J. (2000). Movement control and balance in earthbound movements. In B. M. Nigg, B. R. MacIntosh, & J. Mester (Eds.), Biomechanics and Biology of Movement (pp. 223–239). Human Kinetics.

Montagne, G., Cornus, S., Glize, D., Quaine, F., & Laurent, M. (2000). A perception-action coupling type of control in long jumping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 37–43. https://doi:10.1080/00222890009601358

O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–1031. https://doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000115

O'Regan, J. K. (2022, October 2). A brief summary of the sensorimotor theory of phenomenal consciousness. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xhukf

Potop, V., & Cretu, M. (2015). Biomechanical characteristics of the synchronization of key elements of sport technique of the complex dismounts off beam. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 324–329. https://doi:10.7752/jpes.2015.02049

Potop, V., Cîmpeanu, M., Moga, C., Jurat, V., Manole, C., & Eshtaev, A. (2022). Particularities of the biomechanical characteristics of learning the acrobatic exercises on balance beam in Junior III category (aged 9-10 year). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(8), 1848–1853. https://doi:10.7752/jpes.2022.08232

Raab, M., de Oliveira, R. F., & Heinen, T. (2009). How do people perceive and generate options? In M. Raab, J. G. Johnson, & H. Heekeren (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 174, pp. 49–59). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01305-3

Sands, B., Caine, D. J., & Borms, J. (2003). Scientific aspects of women's gymnastics. Medicine and Sport Science, 45, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000067491

Schöllhorn, W. I., Hegen, P., & Davids, K. (2012). The nonlinear nature of learning. A differential learning approach. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5, 100–112. doi:10.2174/1875399X01205010100

Turoff, F. (1991). Artistic gymnastics. A comprehensive guide to performing and teaching skills for beginners and advanced beginners. C. Brown Publishers.

Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358–389. https://doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358

Withagen, R., & Michaels, C. F. (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1379–1390. https://doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1379

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Heinen, T., Frackmann, J., Müller, A., & Zöllner, V. (2024). MOVEMENT REGULATION IN DISMOUNTS ON THE BALANCE BEAM. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 16(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.16.2.169-179