THE JUDGING OF ARTISTRY COMPONENTS IN FEMALE GYMNASTICS: A CAUSE FOR CONCERN?

Maja Bučar Pajek; Marjeta Kovač; Jernej Pajek; Bojan Leskošek

doi:10.52165/sgj.6.3.5-12

Authors

Maja Bučar Pajek Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Marjeta Kovač Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jernej Pajek University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia
Bojan Leskošek Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.6.3.5-12

Keywords:

Artistic Gymnastics, Evaluation, Panel Judging, Bias

Abstract

Due to its nature and relatively poor definitions in the Code of points, judging of artistry may suffer from serious flaws in reliability and validity. We have used the balance beam artistry evaluation forms given by 5 execution judges at World Championship in Tokyo 2011 to analyze reliability and validity. Data on 194 competitors was gathered. Deductions were received by a highly variable number of competitors from separate judges in the same components of artistry. The variability of average total artistry deduction was relatively large, ranging from 0.18 to 0.39 points. The average correlation coefficient in total artistry deductions between all judge pairs was 0.6±0.06 and average correlation coefficient in total deductions from execution score was 0.73±0.04, p < 0.001. Kendall's coefficient W revealed significant systematic over- or under-rating of judges in the components of artistry of presentation, sureness of performance and variation in rhythm, but also in total artistry deductions (W values ranged from 0.05 to 0.53, p < 0.001 for all W coefficients). We conclude that neither reliability nor validity of artistry judging was satisfactory in this analysis. Further thorough evaluations of judging performance in artistry are needed to guide accommodations and hopefully improvements in this field.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansorge, C. J. & Scheer, J. K. (1988). International bias detected in judging gymnastic competition at the 1984 olympic games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59(2), 103-107.

Ansorge, C.J., Scheer, J.K., Laub, J. & Howard, J. (1978). Bias in judging womens gymnastics induced by expectations of within-team order. Res Q, 49, 399-405.

Aronson, R.M. (1970). The art and science of judging men's gymnastics. Lowell: Lowell Technological Institute.

Boen, F., Van Hoye, K., Vanden Auweele, Y., Feys, J. & Smits, T. (2008). Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 621-628.

Bucar, M., Cuk, I., Pajek, J., Karacsony, I., & Leskosek, B. (2012). Reliability and validity of judging in women's artistic gymnastics at University Games 2009. European Journal of Sport Science, 12(3), 207-215.

Bučar Pajek, M., Forbes, W., Pajek, J., Leskošek, B., & Čuk, I. (2011). Reliability of real time judging system. Science of gymnastics, 3(2), 47-54.

Dallas G. & Kirialanis P.(2010). Judges' evaluation of routines in men's artistic gymnastics. Sci Gymnastics J, 2, 49-58

GymnasticsResultsCom. Gymnastics Results, 2012. Available at: http://www.gymnasticsresults.com; Accessed on 07.01.2012

FIG. (2009). Code of Points for Women Artistic Gymnastics Competitions. Retrieved 19 January 2012, 2012, from http://figdocs.sportcentric.net/external/public.php?folder=661

FIG. (2013). Code of Points for Women Artistic Gymnastics Competitions. Retrieved 12 May 2014, from https://www.fig-gymnastics.com/site/page/view?id=471

Leskošek, B., Čuk, I., Karácsony, I., Pajek, J., & Bučar, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of judging in men’s artistic gymnastics at the 2009 university games. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(1), 25-34.

Majer, N. (2013). Zanesljivost in skladnost sodnic pri sojenju artističnosti na gredi[Reliability and validity of judging artistry at Balance beam]. Bachelor degree. University of Ljubljana: Faculty of sport.

Pajek, M. B., Cuk, I., Pajek, J., Kovac, M., & Leskosek, B. (2013). Is the Quality of Judging in Women Artistic Gymnastics Equivalent at Major Competitions of Different Levels? [Article]. Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 173-181.

Plessner H. (1999). Expectation biases in gymnastics judging. J Sport Exercise Psy, 21, 131-144.

Plessner, H. & Schallies, E. (2005). Judging the cross on rings: A matter of achieving shape constancy. Appl Cognitive Psych, 19, 1145-1156.

Popović, R. (2000). International bias detected in judging rhythmic gymnastics competition at Sydney-2000 Olympic Games. Facta universitatis-series: Phys Educ Sport, 1, 1-13.

Ste-Marie, D. M. (2000). Expertise in women's gymnastic judging: An observational approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(2), 543-546.

Ste-Marie, D.M., Valiquette, S.M. & Taylor G. (2001). Memory-influenced biases in gymnastic judging occur across different prior processing conditions. Res Quarterly Exercise Sport, 72, 420-426.