INFLUENCE OF DANCE ELEMENTS ON BALANCE BEAM RESULTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.3.2.39-45Keywords:
women artistic gymnastics, juniors, difficulty, execution, code of pointsAbstract
According to the Code of Points (FIG, 2009) the balance beam difficulty value is determined by the sum of maximum 8 most difficult elements (including the dismount), fulfilling 5 composition requirements and by the values that exceed from the connections between the acrobatic elements, turns and acro-rhythmic elements. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of performed dance elements on the balance beam and their influence on: difficulty value, execution value and final score. The sample consisted of 109 women top junior athletes, who participated in qualifications on the European Championships in Birmingham in 2010. The results obtained showed that the gymnasts in average perform 4.28 dance elements in their balance beam routines. The highest frequency was determined to a C difficulty jump ˝switch leap˝ (N=101), to two A difficulty jumps: “wolf hop or jump from cross or side position” (N=83) and to ˝Sissone˝ (leg separation 180°) take off from both legs (N=61); and to A difficulty turn: “1/1 turn (360°) on one leg – free leg optional below horizontal” (N=66). Regression analysis revealed a statistically significant influence of some dance elements on the difficulty value of the exercise (p <0.05) and on the final score. Statistically significant influence of different dance elements on the execution value was not found.
Downloads
References
Technical Commitee of the Womens Artistic Gymnastics. (2009). Code of Points. Geneva: Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique.
Čuk, I. & Forbes, W. (2010). How apparatus difficulty scores effect all around results in men's artistic gymnastics. Science of gymnastics, 2(3): 57-63.
Čuk, I., & Atiković, A. (2009). Are Disciplines in All-around Men's Artistic Gymnastics Equal?. Tuzla : Sport Scientific & Practical Aspects International Journal of Kinesiology, 6(1-2): 8-13.
Johnson, L. (2011). The junior Olympic floor exercise dance passage. Technique, 31(1): 6-12.
Leskošek, B., Čuk, I., Karácsony, I., Pajek, J., & Bučar, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of judging in mens artistic gymnastics at the 2009 University Games. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(1): 25-34.
Minusa, H. (2000). How we must develop the Sport of Gymnastics for the future. USA Gymnastics Online: Technique: Levels of Knowledge, from http://www.usa-gymnastics.org/pages/home/publications/technique/2000/8/developsport.pdf
Sands, B. (2011). Judging in ‘real time’. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2010/11/bills-sands-judging-in-real-time/